... gave both models the same 5 UI design prompts - a SaaS landing page, an analytics dashboard, a settings page, a sign-up screen, and a pricing page. TL,DR: Yes. Opus 4.7 produced more polished UIs. Its outputs feel closer to a real product. GPT-5.5's outputs work and look okay, they still feel more like Tailwind UI starter templates than custom designs. Key takeaways Neither output would be ready to ship at first shot. Both would require more ... ... details, refine spacing, and polish components. Claude Opus 4.7 shows better understanding of typography, color, spacing, and UI details. The per-token pricing suggests GPT-5.5 is the most expensive model ($30 per 1M output tokens vs

... marketing problem. They think: "Let the SEO team handle it." Here's why that's wrong: Your product is being evaluated by AI every single day. When potential users ask: "What's the best tool for [your category]?" "Alternatives to [competitor

... they have an optimized website, and if they are showing up in AI search results like ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity. Each business gets a Need Score (0-100) so you instantly see who's desperate for help vs. who's already handled. No more guessing. But I didn't want a data tool; I wanted a closing tool. So I built four workflows directly into the platform: 1. Decision-Maker Contact Reveal: This was the feature I wish ... ... maker's name, email, phone number, and LinkedIn profile right inside the app. No more emailing info@ and hoping it reaches someone who can sign a check; you go straight to the owner. 2. Intel Pages (this is the closer

... hurt early-stage founders. When you are in the early stage, you already doubt yourself enough. You are building, fixing, testing, trying to get users, trying to stay alive. Then you open LinkedIn, X, or founder communities and see competitors posting MRR screenshots, traffic spikes, and growth wins nonstop. And if you do not have built-in credibility, it hits even harder. You are not ex-Google. You are not YC-backed. You do not already have a huge audience ... ... sometimes the answer is no. Sometimes your product is actually better. Sometimes your users are happier. Sometimes your direction is stronger. But the other company is just better at turning random things into a growth story. We saw a competitor

... Road to 1,000,000 #Votap users Day 48 | Current: 1231 The last few percent are the hardest. We re getting users. Investor meetings are getting closer than ever. Things are moving. And funny enough the closer

... Road to 1,000,000 #Votap users Day 48 | Current: 1231 The last few percent are the hardest. We re getting users. Investor meetings are getting closer than ever. Things are moving. And funny enough the closer

... Vibe Coding always felt counter-intuitive to me. As a developer, I think in code, not paragraphs. So I built Shadow Code, a VSCode extension that allows me to convert the pseudocode in my head to clean, accurate, high-quality code. Compared to Vibe Coding, Shadow Coding can: Produce higher-quality code, That is closer

... more than $200M, so it must be decent. They just announced the release of a CLI tool, Auggie, to compete with Claude Code. Here's the launch announcement . Does anyone use Augment day to day? Is this a viable alternative to @Claude Code ? I tried it out the other day and couldn't get used to not being able to see the diffs like you can with other tools. Comment from Adi Singh(@adi_singh5): I've taken a closer

... fully complete, instead of the git flow that favours working on long-lived branches until features are 100% complete. TBD or GitFlow: What's your current developer workflow? Comment from Alex Gap(@lagap): At @Product Hunt , we're closer to the trunk-based development approach, focusing on smaller PRs and making heavy use of feature flagging. This allows us to iterate quickly and gather feedback early. By shipping parts of a feature incrementally, we can get input from team members ... ... there needs to be more team communication with TBD? Comment from fmerian(@fmerian): @lagap fully agree! ooc what tool do you use for feature flagging at Product Hunt ? Comment from Ron Cohen(@roncohen): At Bucket, we do something closer

... wasn t on your whitelist. Not anymore! Now you can add or remove senders from the whitelist as you wish, and filters will always remain up to date with your changes. 3. As a last thing, I m getting closer to removing the biggest barrier of entry to Sentrya. Sentrya was still in testing mode, which meant that it wasn t verified by Google, which used to put people off. I get it though. I wouldn t trust ... ... company that hasn t been verified, either. But that s all about to change. I got Sentrya ready to be sent to Google for a closer

... your website makes, the slower it will load. Minimize HTTP requests by reducing the number of resources on your web pages. 4.Use a Content Delivery Network (CDN): A CDN can improve website speed by caching content on servers located closer to the user. 5. Minimize Redirects: Redirects can slow down website loading times. Minimize redirects by removing unnecessary redirects. 6. Enable Browser Caching: Browser caching can improve website speed by storing frequently accessed resources on the user s device ... ... your website s database can improve website speed by reducing the time it takes to retrieve data. 13. Use a Content Delivery Network (CDN) for Images: A CDN for images can improve website speed by delivering images from a closer