Mona Truong's profile on Product Hunt

About

Hello, my name is Mona, and I’m a member of a startup called Murror. I found my way here naturally, simply because I’m a typical Gen Z. I’ve always been curious about psychology, mental health, and my own behavioral patterns. After going through my own mental health struggles, I spent time learning and reflecting, which led me to want to help others like myself. That’s how I discovered Murror and met its CEO, Astro Tran. After overcoming depression, he built Murror - an app that helps young people share hard-to-say stories, explore emotions, and build real connections. My goal is simple: to help make Murror successful, so the world can feel a little less lonely 💪✨

Links

Badges

Buddy System

Thought Leader

Tastemaker

Tastemaker 10

View all badges

Maker History

MurrorAI that helps you understand your emotions & connect deeper
Dec 2025

🎉

Joined Product HuntJuly 7th, 2025

Forums

p/murror

•

2d ago

AI raised commits 240% and releases 30%. The gap is the only number that should change your Q4 plan.

A new NBER paper tracks 500,000+ GitHub developers against their actual AI telemetry. The task-level gains are enormous and they mostly don't survive the trip to a shipped release. Across four app marketplaces: a sharp rise in new apps, no rise in total usage.

Most of the AI-productivity argument you've read this year is two camps shouting single numbers at each other. There's a paper out that makes both camps right and is more useful than either, and the revised version went up this month, so it's worth twenty minutes before you write your Q4 plan.

p/murror

•

4d ago

One App Store Connect checkbox can force your app to 13+. As of this month you can't skip it.

From September 2026 you can't submit an update without saying whether your app has social media capabilities. Say yes and Apple applies a minimum 13+ rating and drops you into a Time Allowance parents can cap. The definition is broader than having a feed, and your secondary category is load-bearing too.

If you've shipped an update in the last few days you've already met this question. If you haven't, you will on your next one, and I'd rather you met it here than at 11pm with a release branch open.

p/murror

•

6d ago

Before you put a GEO line in the Q4 budget: Google's own docs say there is nothing to optimise.

Search Central states plainly that AI Overviews need no special markup, no AI text files, no schema. The one independent study of what users actually do is 18 months old and says a citation is worth a 1% click. Everything fresher is measured by the people selling the service.

It's Q4 planning season, which means a lot of small teams are about to write GEO on a budget line. Before you do, I'd spend twenty minutes on two documents, because they disagree with the pitch in a specific way.

The first is Google's own page on AI features and your website, in Search Central. It says there are no additional requirements to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode, and no special optimisations necessary. Further down it's blunter: you don't need to create new machine-readable files, AI text files, or markup, and there's no special schema.org structured data to add. The whole page is a restatement of ordinary SEO fundamentals - be crawlable, be indexable, be useful, have your important content in text.

That's the platform saying, in its own documentation, that the product being sold to you does not exist as a distinct technical practice. You can decide Google is being coy. I'd just note that this is the one party in the conversation with nothing to sell you, and that it's the version I'd have to defend if I were wrong.