... analyzed the top domains cited across all LLMs in Rankfender . The results change how you should think about AI visibility. The data (Rankfender, Juin 2026): Reddit: 11.29% LinkedIn: 11.03% Wikipedia: 9.53% YouTube: 8.77% Medium: 5.83% Facebook: 5.55% Mapbox: 4.76% OpenStreetMap: 4.59% NIH: 4.58% Instagram: 3.70% Forbes: 3.43% Google: 3.18% Quora: 2.82% What this tells you: User generated content dominates. Reddit, LinkedIn, and Wikipedia

... Mode, Gemini, and Claude found that every major AI engine has a persistent source preference . Not just a trend. A consistent editorial identity that holds month after month. The breakdown of editorial identities : ChatGPT Search is encyclopedic. It favors Wikipedia for Education, Recommendations, Comparison, and Purchase queries. If your content reads like a reference section, it surfaces here. Perplexity is video-anchored. It leads with YouTube for Education and Recommendations. Written content alone leaves citations on the table. Google ... ... other engines produced . Gemini is YouTube-anchored across every single intent in the dataset. It is the most consistent YouTube-first engine. Claude bypasses the social and encyclopedic layers entirely. In early 2026 data, it never surfaced YouTube, Wikipedia

... Most AI visibility tools show you a dashboard. They tell you where you're invisible. They show you competitors winning. Then what? You stare at the screen, knowing there's a gap, but no idea how to close it. RAIVE 2.2 (Rankfender AI Visibility Engine) fixes that. It's not just a tracking engine. It's a prescription engine. It analyzes where competitors

... distribution varied dramatically by model. Source Type ChatGPT Perplexity Gemini Claude Llama Comparison pages 28% 24% 12% 8% 6% FAQs 22% 19% 14% 11% 9% News/press 8% 12% 31% 14% 11% Forums (Reddit, etc.) 6% 9% 5% 34% 19% Wikipedia 12% 14% 21% 9% 7% Blogs 14% 11% 9% 13% 28% E commerce/reviews 6% 7% 4% 6% 12% Other 4% 4% 4% 5% 8% ChatGPT and Perplexity favored structured content (comparisons, FAQs). Gemini favored press and Wikipedia

... visibility content) 5. Platforms Outside Your Website Drive 1 in 3 Citations We tracked where AI systems found the information they cited. Source Type % of Citations Your own website 64% Third-party platforms 36% The top third-party sources: Wikipedia (22x citation frequency across AI responses) G2 / Capterra (3x) LinkedIn professional content (6x) YouTube tutorials (14x for category queries) Medium cross-published content Implication: If your brand is not present on these platforms, you are missing more than a third ... ... With This Data We built Rankfender to help companies measure exactly how they appear in AI answers across the exact queries buyers are actually using. We track 7 AI systems daily We measure Share of Voice against competitors

... box . ' . ( _ ) ______________________________ . Imagine: You're deep into a technical doc. Three browser tabs open. A Wikipedia article on one, an API reference on another, a blog post explaining a workaround on the third. You find exactly what you need. Now you switch to ChatGPT or Claude to actually use that information and convert it into code based on your specific architecture. And then it hits you: you have ... ... myself: why does AI forget me the moment I leave the chat window? And that's what we just fixed. AI Context Flow now gives you an AI sidebar on EVERY website. Not just ChatGPT. Not just Claude. Everywhere. Wikipedia

... while ago, I stumbled upon a massively viral Reddit post (~3k upvotes). A guy had built a way to browse Wikipedia on a canvas: every link opened as a new node on a Miro-like board, so you could visually track your entire rabbit hole - from ping-pong balls to thermonuclear reactors. Under that post, there were hundreds of comments asking the same thing: "This is amazing. Please make it work for all websites, not just Wikipedia

... Elon Musk was extremely frustrated that Wikipedia couldn t be manipulated, and he even offered $1 billion if they renamed it to d*ckipedia. Since that didn t work out, he s now trying to build his own platform for gathering information claiming that Wikipedia

... curious about how their recommendations are actually pulled from the web. I'm not an expert, listen to the podcast, but I am actively tackling it so have some tactical learnings. I mainly came across AEO by looking at competitors and researching. I was always surprised that I d search and end up on the home page of a product, not another more credible source - just because they d written a smart blog post about it. See this for "best ... ... within days ChatGPT was quoting it. Again, see image below. Reddit + Quora replies matter . Jumping into the right forums and conversations gets picked up so you need to produce content AND reply to open topics in your domain area. Wikipedia

... first time founder. After spending 15+ years in fintech in the bay, going from PayPal to SimpleLegal (YC S13) to Stripe, I'm solo founding a B2C fintech. Most of my previous launches have been open-source libraries ( these ) and Wikipedia-oriented work (e.g., L2W ) on HN and Reddit. PH sure has changed a lot since I first gave it a look! Was originally thinking an HN launch in a couple weeks, but honestly PH has come so far since ...

... Free Document Maker is now officially listed on Wikipedia : We ve built a browser-first platform offering 30+ free AI tools to help users create, convert, and compress documents with no sign-up, no ads, and no tracking. What you can do with Free Document Maker: Generate invoices, certificates, CVs, contracts Convert PDFs, compress images, resize WebP/JPG Use tools instantly mobile & desktop friendly Download files as PDF, PNG, TXT, DOC and more Website: Free Document Maker Built with: Laravel ...