We re officially in nominees season for the Orbit Awards: AI Workflow Automation.

Thank you all for the great support on the launch of @CoThou Autonomous Superagent over 100 new users and incredible feedback!

Back to work on clearing some bugs, and as always, if you have any questions, I m almost always online.

To those who had a chance to try it, I d love to hear your thoughts, feedback, and experiences so we can continue refining and improving the product.

With the advent of clawdbots, it's as if we've all lost our inhibitions and "put our lives completely in their hands."

I'm all for delegating work, but not giving them too much personal/sensitive stuff to handle.

Source.

As usual, Y Combinator came up with segments that are worth investing:

1. Cursor for Product Managers
2. AI-Native Hedge Funds
3. AI-Native Agencies
4. Stablecoin Financial Services
5. AI for Government
6. Modern Metal Mills
7. AI Guidance for Physical Work 8. Large Spatial Models 9. Infra for Government Fraud Hunters 10. Make LLMs Easy to Train

Since I haven't been able to meet my work goals very well in the last few quarters, I now plan to approach them more systematically and not push myself too hard on work goals, as that ultimately led to problems that made my plan less sustainable.

So here is my structure and list:

This post is actually inspired by a tweet from @sandradjajic + an update here on PH from @chrismessina.

A few days ago I saw this:

New AI models pop up every week. Some developer tools like @Cursor, @Zed, and @Kilo Code let you choose between different models, while more opinionated products like @Amp and @Tonkotsu default to 1 model.

Curious what the community recommends for coding tasks? Any preferences?

Anthropic announced last week a new round of fundings:

• $30B in Series G funding

• $380B valuation

• $14B run-rate revenue

• 10X growth YoY

For @Claude Code only - launched in May 2025:

After our first launch on Product Hunt, our team spent a little over a month upgrading the product. There were major changes to the UI and several new features added, so the process took time from discussions and redesigning the interface to testing, fixing bugs, and updating AI prompts.

We re also a very small team, so everyone had to push themselves to give 200%. Time and resources are limited, and at the same time, we also had to work on securing funding for the next six months to keep the team running and continue developing the app.

When I interviewed for my current company, I had a conversation with the Founder and PM that lasted more than an hour. Interestingly, only about 30% of the discussion focused on my experience which made sense, since my background wasn t directly related to the role I applied for.

The remaining 70% of the conversation was about how I approach real-world problems, my mindset toward the work I would be doing, and how I envisioned growing in the role. They also asked why I chose this product and company, what it meant to me personally, and how I hoped to contribute moving forward.

Today, I came across an article on TechCrunch: The great computer science exodus (and where students are going instead).

It shows that UC campuses saw a drop in computer science enrollment for the first time since the dot-com crash (6% in 2025, 3% in 2024), but students are shifting to AI-focused programs.

First of all, I want to thank you for voting for us in yesterday's launch - you still can, the week is not over. HERE

Second thing, I summarised some things that I realised, reflected on, and maybe should have known sooner:

Once upon a time, developing for Apple was an exciting, rewarding challenge. But lately, that relationship has soured.

Apple has transformed into a trillion-dollar giant that sees developers not as partners, but as a resource to control, extract from, and when convenient ignore.

Hey PH

We're launching Rover on Feb 25th, but the preview is live right now and we want your honest takes before we go big.

What it is: One script tag on your website your users get an AI agent that takes real actions inside your UI. Clicks buttons, fills forms, runs checkout, guides onboarding. Through conversation.

<script src="https://rover.rtrvr.ai/embed.js"></script>

Hey everyone,

I've built my product around traditional SaaS pricing (monthly tiers), but I m starting to wonder if that model is getting outdated, especially with more AI-powered and compute-heavy tools entering the market.
That shift requires real architectural changes, instrumentation, metering, billing logic, and UI changes, not just pricing tweaks. It s something I m starting to seriously think about for my own product.

In particular, AI usage has real COGs (every prompt costs money), and I m seeing more platforms experimenting with usage-based models, or hybrids like SaaS base + usage + overage.

For those of you building AI or compute-intensive tools:

AI Context Flow just launched its most powerful features
2,200 users. Hundreds of feedback messages. One recurring request:
" , , ?"
We heard you. And we shipped it.
' :
- Cross-platform context (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity) - that stayed
- NEW: AI Sidebar that works on EVERY website you visit
- 30+ model switcher so you can use any AI with your context
- One-click saving from ANYWHERE on the web
You're no longer limited to AI chat platforms. Your memory travels with you across the entire internet.
Full demo:

Today I received a question about proper launch preparation:

Nika, how long should this take us?

And I didn t have a clear answer.

Greetings, Everyone.

We launched a week ago and today we're shipping the 2.0 Beta.

Yesterday Lunair launched on Product Hunt - and we just found out we re officially Product of the Day

This is something I ll find out in just a short while, one week from now (Jan 28), as I m about to re-launch a digital detox app. If you want, follow, maybe you will be on watch of my steps and activities

However, that s not the main point of this post.

We re letting users take over Votap
One thing that s been really cool lately? The emails.
People telling us what they like.
What they d change.
Which politicians we should add next.
I answer as many as I can, but it made me realize something:
If Votap is about public opinion
then the app itself should be shaped by public opinion too.
So in the next update (coming very soon), we re adding a proper feedback space directly inside the app.
You ll be able to:
Suggest features
Request politicians
Comment on ideas
Upvote what you want to see next
Other users can vote on suggestions too so we build what people actually care about.
Votap is a people platform first.
So the product should evolve with the people using it.
We want this live before our next bigger user acquisition push (aiming much higher next time ).
If you want to help shape it, download Votap from the App Store.
More tomorrow.

We've objectively tested Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and Edge to determine which offers the best:

Speed,

Standards Compliance,

Hey there creative ad people. We're working non-stop to make marketfunkers the best as it can be, and feedback is very valuable.
So if you're into performance marketing/paid social/copywriting - give the platform a test and let me know what you think.
- Gligor

Why Records?

Mnexium memories are great for capturing facts, preferences, and context from conversations. But many AI applications also need to manage structured business data events on a calendar, deals in a pipeline, contacts in a CRM, tasks on a board, inventory items, support tickets.

Until now, you had two choices: build a separate database and API layer for your structured data, or try to shoehorn everything into unstructured memories. Neither is ideal.