... immediately jump into our roadmap and build whatever feature they asked for. But after reading through dozens of exit surveys, we realized a hard truth: lack of features almost never drives people away. They churn because we made onboarding too complex and didn't help them build a daily habit around our tool. They didn't lose interest in the problem; they just gave up on our setup process. Do users leave because your app lacks power, or because ...

... high completion rates, but 30-day retention remained weak. Once we stripped the tour down to just one core setup action, retention jumped. Showing off everything upfront just overwhelmed users before they got actual value. Did simplifying your onboarding boost retention or increase confusion? Comment from Maali Baali(@maali_baali): The retention jump is interesting. Did you also see users reaching the first aha moment faster after simplifying the tour ...

... Spend three weeks on creating a sleek 90-second video onboarding, professional audio, custom animation and all the bells and whistles. Pitted it against onboarding

... creating an account A ready-made plan should be available immediately The product shows too many features before demonstrating its core value For founders who have dealt with a similar problem: How did you separate poor targeting from poor onboarding? Which event did you use as your activation metric? Did delaying registration improve activation? What qualitative or quantitative data would you collect before changing the onboarding

... account. Three things I'd love your take on: Is it clear within a few seconds what the product is for? Does separating facts from assumptions feel useful, or like extra work? Where would you drop off in the onboarding? It's live here if you want to try it: https://www.producthunt.com/prod... It's an early beta, so blunt feedback is the most useful kind ...

... version of this you've run into. Drop it here, no need to be nice about it: Name the product What went wrong What you wish they'd done instead Feels like free UX research for anyone building an onboarding flow right now, so might as well make ...

... that no tweaks to the subject line have managed to change. I used to equate open rate with interest level. Now I realize that all it means is that our subject lines were good and that we sucked at onboarding. Anyone who has ever had to deal with a problem like this, was the solution something to do with the email, the timing, or something about the product itself that emails couldn't solve ...

... facing an onboarding challenge with an invite-based B2B platform Our customers invite external partners who need to accept an invitation, create a profile and configure their account before they can begin collaborating Today, this often requires a demo involving both companies That works when a customer has a few partners, but becomes difficult when they need to onboard

... Watch the full onboarding video here: This is the first thing every new Votap user goes through after downloading the app, and it s about to become one of my biggest focuses. Over the next few weeks, I ll be working on making this flow faster, smoother and better at turning a download into someone who actually sticks around and uses Votap. I d love some outside eyes on it. How are the visuals? Does the flow ...

... them a simple starting task let them explore everything themselves use videos/tutorials hide most features until they need them or something completely different? Especially interested in products that are not immediately obvious in the first minute . How do you onboard users into something complex? Comment from Adana Marukhyan(@adana): @iggy_love  Oh wow! I m definitely interested! =) Please share your experience and resources. Comment from Linoy Bar-Gal(@linoy_bar_gal): We went the other way and made onboarding

... building Expertise, a platform where GTM experts publish their playbooks as skills that businesses run on their AI agents, and there's a debate that comes up with every expert we onboard: should a skill be open or locked? Before building, we looked at why prompt marketplaces and open skill catalogs kept dying. A playbook written as text is just a string, and a string gets copied the moment it's worth copying. And there's a newer twist ...

... first 200 users were door to door. I called my school friends, my ex-colleagues, my university mates, people I met on networking events. Anyone that (kinda) fit my ICP and would respond to my message. 2/ Manual onboarding on calls My co-founders and I manually onboarded

... everyone! Coming off our launch last week, we spent some time digging into our analytics for SoundGate and one metric really stood out: our onboarding drop-off rate is sitting at less than 1%. When we originally sat down to design that first user interaction, we spent a massive amount of time debating and refining the experience. It is incredibly tempting to use onboarding

... assumed people would understand our onboarding because it seemed obvious to us. They didn't. Almost everyone paused on the same screen because we were asking them to make a decision before explaining why it mattered. Changing the order of two steps made the whole flow feel much simpler. It reminded me that founders already know their product. New users don't. Have you found any usability issues that only became obvious after watching someone use your product? Comment from ...

... want help right there, in the moment. That insight led us to build NINA , an AI assistant that lives inside the product and guides users step by step using the live interface. I'm curious how other builders approach onboarding: What's been the biggest challenge for your users? Have documentation and videos been enough? If you could redesign your onboarding

... Sunday is 39.7%, on Tuesday 8.6%. But product of the week is won on weekdays, so depends what you are after. On hunters, since @rhea_diamante asked. Launches with a hunter who has 10+ hunts average 235 upvotes vs 131 without. Almost double. Part of it is selection, good products find good hunters, but the gap is there. On team. Solo makers average 123, 2-3 makers 188, 4+ makers 288. So your last point about small engaged base ... ... should keep building, change the positioning, or move on. Of course, this is different for a funded company. If the launch is strategically important and failure would hurt the brand, I d polish every detail: product, assets, positioning, onboarding

... week ago I posted here about onboarding the first 30 FounderFlow members personally instead of opening a public signup. The part that actually surprised me was not the onboarding

... Polished onboarding can still be confusing if each step feels like a surprise. After the first action, ask a new user what they think will happen next. Their prediction exposes whether the product's mental model is clear before completion rates do. If five people finish but all five expected a different result, the funnel is technically working and the product is still teaching the wrong thing. Where in your onboarding

... been there for six years. The new employee has no context, no guidelines, no standards, no business awareness... AI is no different. Before expecting strong results, we should give it the relevant context, guidelines and examples. How do you onboard AI? Do you write instructions and examples with every task, or use another approach? And has this improved your results ...

... When we first launched Murror, our onboarding looked like every other app. Five screens. Set your goals. Pick your interests. Create a profile. Upload a photo. 14% of users made it through. The rest disappeared before they ever journaled a single thought. We assumed the problem was friction -- too many steps, too many taps. So we cut it down to three screens. Completion went up to 22%. Better, but still terrible. Then we talked to users who dropped off. What ... ... Users could write one word or three paragraphs. They could be specific or vague. The app responded with: "Got it. Let's start there." Completion hit 67%. But here's what surprised us more: the people who completed this onboarding

... Agencies and service businesses still onboard clients with email, Drive, and can you send that again? I built Synerdeck to fix that: reusable templates, branded magic-link portals (no client account), progress tracking, documents, and reminders focused on onboarding

... Thanks for the welcome on launch day! Appreciate the warm reception an insightful questions. A few clarifications on the most common asks + some onboarding updates: Pricing : https://scritty.dev/#pricing - self serve individual and team pilot licenses are now live! Personal Pilot ( direct ): https://buy.stripe.com/00weV56jD... Team Pilot ( direct ): https://buy.stripe.com/4gM00b4bv... Enterprise ( k8s/managed deployments) isn't self serve as it needs a bit of setup on our side, so please reach out directly and we'll get you going Personal ... ... that or point you at the docs. Enterprise is our hybrid and fully air gapped options; this has variable setup time, driven mostly by your security posture, networking, and existing infrastructure. Assuming right internal resources are engaged with our onboarding

... Product Hunt, some updates on Banger Mail after the PH's launch. We started to receive great feedback and I'm personally onboarding a small batch of Mac-based teams that want to use Banger Mail on real shared inbox work. This is not a subscription push. I want to see how your team handles support, sales, hello@, founders@, and other shared email workflows so we can make Banger better for the teams using it. Right now this onboarding

... aurali-design.vercel.app/ AI Onboarding Generator & App Store Screenshots(Coming Soon) I m currently validating a SaaS concept called Aurali ( https://aurali-design.vercel.app/ ). It's an AI tool that generates custom mobile onboarding

... founders to sign up for Causo after launch. Nice number. Felt good for about 12 seconds. Then we looked at the funnel properly and got humbled pretty fast. 253 created a company profile. 92 completed onboarding. 90 got matched with investors. 38 actually launched outreach. 18 became paying customers. So yeah, top of funnel looked pretty decent. But the real lesson was not how do we get people to sign up? It was: how do we get founders to trust ... ... fundraising outreach without manually building lists, writing everything from scratch, or duct-taping 5 tools together. Rough numbers so far from the fundraising product: 272 founders signed up in the fundraising flow 253 created a company profile 92 completed onboarding