... your writing with AI directly where you type no switching apps, no copy-pasting. How it works: You type normally, tap the Clarify button, and AI rewrites/fixes/translates your text inline. Changed words are highlighted so you can tap to revert individual edits you don't like. Comment from Daniil Park(@dan_pak): @farrukh_butt1   Absolutely on point! Comment from Colin Barrett(@colin_barrett): Would love to see if it can learn user preferences to reduce unnecessary edits. Comment from ... ... from Greg Mason(@greg_mason1): i like that changes are highlighted. It gives me confidence that I can still keep my original voice instead of blindly accepting edits Comment from Nitesh Kumar(@nitesh_kumar98): The ability to tap and revert

... seconds is the ultimate vibe. But we ve been running into a massive wall: Git text conflicts. When an agent gets 99% of a huge refactor right, but completely hallucinates one core module, trying to use standard git revert is a nightmare. You hit an unresolvable wall of red and green because the agent shifted formatting everywhere. Git was built for humans typing linearly, not AI generating thousands of lines at once. Are you all just manually fixing the broken ... ... functions, or reverting

... more than $200M, so it must be decent. They just announced the release of a CLI tool, Auggie, to compete with Claude Code. Here's the launch announcement . Does anyone use Augment day to day? Is this a viable alternative to @Claude Code ? I tried it out the other day and couldn't get used to not being able to see the diffs like you can with other tools. Comment from steve beyatte(@steveb): @adi_singh5  The diff view ... ... underlying context and accuracy models. Given that their competing against the actual model provider, I'd be surprised if they can do better than Claude Code. Comment from steve beyatte(@steveb): @rickyguo  nice, are you using it with VS

... fairly loaded topic. Analytics & Building Your Own Admin Tools Easily integrate Google Analytics by simply inputting your measurement ID into Bolt for basic user insights. Remember to ask it to track key events across your application. Alternatively, build your own internal admin-only analytics dashboard for more detailed engagement tracking, such as daily and monthly active users, and specific engagement metrics. Once your app is live, monitor feature that are getting used the most and proactively prune features that ... ... prompt it with: "What s a secure but simple way to implement this? Do not make code changes yet" Bolt often defaults to generating numerous Supabase hooks, which may impact performance negatively. Clearly distinguish when to use backend APIs versus

... apps, like @Central (YC S24) ). I m curious: which did you choose (something else?) and why? Comment from David Justice(@david_justice): I love Neon! Idk why more people don't talk about it. Easily create branches and revert back to a time in history if you accidentally drop tables or needed data. Also have one of the most generous free tiers and ui is very clean. Comment from Tim Su(@iambetaful): We use Neon, but Supabase seems ...

... editor journey has been: 1. Tried out Github copilot in VS Code. Loved it. 2. Then tried out @Cursor after @bernatfortet kept talking about it. Immediately switch to Cursor. 3. Then tried out @Windsurf after @lagap discovered it. Immediately fell in love and switched. Anecdotally, everyone is talking about Cursor. And no one is really talking about Windsurf. On Product Hunt, Cursor has 845 Shoutouts. Windsurf has two? In my experience, Windsurf is the leader at the moment with ... ... cascade/iterative prompting. Comment from Shao(@randomor): @gonzagued  yeah this is a fast race the feature comparisons can become out of date quickly. Since I posted, Cursor did introduce the unified UX and even a revert