... chatting or coding. They re tasks that continue after I close my laptop: checking something periodically, maintaining a server, watching for changes, or taking action only when certain conditions are met. That feels quite different from how I use Codex or Claude. With those tools, I m usually present and actively driving the session. With an always-on agent, I m delegating something and coming back later. I m curious where others have found this distinction actually useful. What have ...

... Hello guys, for the context, in Murmell, we run CLI sessions like Claude code and Codex, and damn this mf is consuming too much RAM around 800mb. For comparaison Codex

... built Codex Desktop Custom Models because experimenting with alternative

... built CodexControl after using multiple Codex accounts and realizing that switch the auth file is not enough for a reliable desktop workflow. The app is local-first and focuses on two jobs: showing live quota state for each account switching the active local Codex

... tokens on the same task and hit several errors along the way, a 5.5x gap for the same deliverable. Separately, other community head-to-heads put Claude Code at roughly 3-4x the token use of Codex on comparable work, so depending which pair you're comparing, the "efficient" tool flips. Zero-shot capability and token frugality don't always come from the same tool. On raw benchmark performance, Claude Opus 4.6 sits around ... ... powering Codex

... still not trust it? Comment from Lucas Pols(@lucasjpols): @stephanie_t0317  Claude cowork is life changing. Comment from Lucas Pols(@lucasjpols): @tarqiya_forgah  Fair! Comment from Chris M. Nzouat(@nzouat): @lucasjpols  Yes, in my opinion, Codex is exceptionally adept at autonomously executing tasks with minimal human intervention . Additionally, Codex

... maintain Agent Only, an open-source MCP memory service for coding agents. The problem I kept hitting was repetitive troubleshooting: a fix discovered in one Codex or Claude session disappeared when the next session started. Agent Only gives agents a small shared workflow to search, reuse, record, and review verified troubleshooting notes. The smallest install is: npx -y agent-only-mcp For Codex

... been using Codex, Claude Code, and OpenClaw for different kinds of work: Codex

... hunters, Termi Protocol is a 3D AI agent workspace for macOS and Windows. Think of it as a desktop GUI for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Copilot CLI and other terminal coding agents. Instead of juggling terminal windows, you watch your agents walk to their desks, read files, run commands and ship real code inside a cozy 3D room. Every agent gets its own desk, terminal, checkpoints and memory. Version 0.1.8 is now live for macOS and Windows. Here is what ... ... click and watch it move to Doing. - Session recap: close the app, come back later, and every agent picks up with a summary of where it left off. This works for non-Claude CLIs too. - Live plan sync: when Codex

... Daily reality: Claude Code in one pane, Codex in another, Cursor in a third, plus a few shells. An agent stops and waits for "yes". By the time I find the right pane, 20 min gone. Just me? What's your setup notifications, layout tricks, or you've accepted the tax? Comment from Kidder(@hellokidder01): @jacob_spencer2  Exactly the bottleneck moved. The model is fast enough now that the friction is on our side: locating the pane, then reloading ... ... Treat them like interns. Start with sandbox + repetitive tasks, then edge cases, then 1% traffic. Comment from Kidder(@hellokidder01): Honestly this is exactly why I built one for myself PokePoke . Menubar app, pings me when any agent (Claude Code / Codex

... past few months I've been juggling three AI coding agents Claude Code for architecture, Codex for implementation, GLM for review. The pain wasn't any single one of them. It was the switching cost. Every time I switched engines I had to re-explain the project: which framework, which conventions, where the old conversation left off. None of them remembered what the others knew. I'd waste 10 15 minutes per switch re-loading context, and half the time ... ... started building a small thing for myself. Local desktop app. Lets me run all three engines from one window, with a shared memory layer underneath. The thing I underestimated: persistent memory is the whole game. Once Claude and Codex

... code. Five years in sales. I've never written a line of anything. But for the past year I've been building actually shipping by talking . Literally talking. Wispr Flow turns my voice into text, Claude Code and Codex do the engineering, and I'm the guy in the middle arguing about architecture in plain English at 2am. And somewhere in there I ran into the most ironic problem in AI: Every morning, every one of my tools had forgotten ... ... logical thing: I used the AIs that kept forgetting me to build the thing that makes them remember. That's Atlaso one memory for every AI you use. Your decisions, preferences, and context follow you across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex

... worker. For UI testing, a remote headed browser is not just a convenience. It changes the debugging loop. Instead of asking "what did the script think happened?", you can ask "what did the user actually see?" ### Harness Code vs Local Agent Harness Another important decision is where the agent capability should come from. One option is to build the entire reasoning layer yourself: call an LLM API directly, manage prompts, retries, tool calls, screenshots, JSON parsing, and safety rules. That ... ... gives maximum control, but it also means the test harness becomes an AI platform project. The alternative

... work domain now has a decent tool. Harvey and Legora for legal. Rogo for finance. All decent and all narrow and not accessible to everyone. Coding has something the rest of knowledge work doesn't: harnesses. Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Codex, Claude Code general-purpose agents that turn a model into a real force multiplier. So where's the equivalent for everyone else? Why is there no publicly available harness that's a genuine upgrade over Claude Code or Codex

... just shipped plugins, MCP, and skills for ToughTongue AI. What this means: Your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) can now create practice scenarios, refine them from real session data, and analyze team performance - without leaving the terminal. Setup (one command): Claude Code: claude plugin install toughtongue@toughtongue-skills Codex

... Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex most of the day, and I keep flip-flopping between two setups that both feel wrong. Setup 1, babysit: I watch every command and approve everything myself. Nothing slips past me, but I'm stuck at the terminal and the whole point of running an agent is gone. I might as well be typing it myself. Setup 2, let it rip: auto-approve, skip permissions, go do other work. Faster in theory. Except I come ... ... Same queue, totally different urgency. Telling those two apart automatically is the piece I don't have clean yet. In your setup, how are you deciding which of the 20 percent is allowed to wait for a window versus

... Codex Content Ops turns one product update into platform-specific drafts, publishing checks, local status tracking, metric snapshots, and lead-routing copy. This note was produced by the workflow itself. This is an early dogfooding workflow, not a full Product Hunt launch yet. Public write-up: https://www.cnblogs.com/aimalou/... ...

... Pasting a screenshot into a terminal agent is messier than it should be. On macOS Codex wants Ctrl+V, not Cmd+V. Claude Code on Windows wants Alt+V. Some terminals just eat the image. So people end up saving the shot to disk and referencing the path by hand, which kills the flow. What's your real workflow, drag and drop, the --image flag, save-and-reference, something better? Trying to map how people actually do this. Comment from ...

... pretty actively recently, and v0.7.7 is one of the bigger workflow updates so far. VibeAround is an all-in-one hub for AI coding agents. The goal is to keep the agents you already use, such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Claude Desktop, and Codex

... bridge debugging. When bridge mode is enabled, you can open a live recorder from the connection popup and inspect the original request body, bridge request body, upstream response body, and bridge response body. Improved local bridge proxy bypass for Codex launches, including local NO_PROXY coverage and Codex

... everyone ! Just shipped a big update to IdleDev and wanted to share it here first. Quick recap if you haven't seen it: IdleDev fills the dead time in your AI coding sessions. While Claude, Codex, Gemini (etc.) are thinking or running tools, a clean sponsor sidebar runs right beside your agent in the terminal. Developers get paid for that idle screen time, advertisers get a direct line to devs. No tracking pixels, no popups. What changed in v2: Live ... ... sidebar ads. Headlines, and link, sitting next to your agent instead of a cramped status bar Way more agents supported. Claude Code, Codex

... this release: - Test configured web search sources directly from the desktop Settings flow. - Inspect search requests and source-separated results in the Bridge recorder. - Better profile connection coverage around bridge launches and provider test flows. - Fixes for Codex Desktop API bridge model routing, including fake model IDs such as `GPT-5.5` with DeepSeek. - Compatibility with older Codex

... daily driver and does the heavy lifting on almost everything I ship. Codex has some immense raw power though, so I keep it around as the second pair of hands for bigger implementation passes. But if I could only keep one, it's Claude Code every time. Also pro tip, i connected codex

... power user who lives in AI tools daily. $339 if you have a team and want shared context across everyone. "Does it work with [tool X]?" If it supports MCP, yes. ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, all confirmed. More being added. "How is it different from Custom Instructions or Projects?" Custom instructions are a workaround, not a solution. They're capped at a few hundred words and static across all your projects. Both projects and custom instructions and locked ... ... tool. If you switch to Claude Code from Codex

... keep the feedback quality high, is there any incentive for people to give thoughtful ratings vs just quick swipes? Comment from Shreyans Bhansali(@shreyans_assistiv): Love this thread. Jumping in. Building AskCodi one agent, Codi, that sits on top of your coding tools. It routes each task to the right model and the right agent (Claude Code, Codex