Insights by Omnia - Step-by-step action plans to improve your AI visibility.
by•
Omnia Insights turns any prompt you track into a prioritized action plan to improve your visibility in AI engines. Each plan includes impact level, why it matters, how to implement, and the citation gaps to close.
Replies
Omnia
@danimirror yeah, the 6h manual citation analysis is the actual cost — running this for a multi-language blog ourselves, the diff between english and non-english citation sets is where the hours go, not the visibility numbers. the thing i can't quite picture from the screenshots is how impact ranking handles citation volatility between weekly runs. cited sources drop in and out faster than the actions targeting them can be shipped, so a "high impact" plan from monday can read stale by friday — would explain how prioritization holds up week to week.
Omnia
@webappski Hey Alex! Good question.
The citations vary a lot, as you said, but some of them gain authority for LLMs and became more and more cited for specific prompts.
For instance: in the first picture we have the citations from a Nike prompt about tennis shoes in the last 7 days. Then second one, is the same prompt's citations in the last 4 weeks. Do you see runrepeat? or Tenisnerd.net? The same domain is cited constantly during this period. So that citation is more important than other that are not being repeated to many times.
We decide based on data like this which of them are more important to your brand.
Last 7 days:
last 4 weeks:
@danimirror the "monitoring → action plan" gap is the right one to close - most GEO tools stop at "you're invisible in ChatGPT" and leave the founder staring at a dashboard. Question on the citation gap analysis: are you pulling live citations per query, or is there a cached layer? Asking because LLM citations drift week-to-week (same prompt, different sources), so an action plan built on Monday's snapshot can be partially stale by Friday. How fresh is the underlying data when Insights generates the plan?
Omnia
Hey @artem_fedorovich ! Thanks for asking.
We pull citations daily in different AI engines to have fresh data always.
@danimirror The "cool dashboard, now what?" gap is real. Most visibility tools stop at the diagnosis and leave you to figure out the prescription, which is where 90% of the value lives.
The citation gap piece is the most interesting part to me. Knowing which sources cite competitors and shape sentiment usually takes a human half a day and a spreadsheet. If Insights does that cleanly, it's a wedge.
One question: how opinionated is the action plan? Does it rank by effort-to-impact, or pure impact? Curious how you handle the "great idea, three months of work" trap.
Love this Guys!! Btw, does it track visibility down by country/market too, or is it focused on global signals for now?
Omnia
Hey@munis_abbas !
Yes, you can track prompts and generate per-country insights. Citations in the UK rarely match the ones in Spain or the US, so with Omnia you monitor and act on the specific market you select.
@danimirror Perfect!!
Omnia
Love this feature!
What a great work from the whole team building it!
Capchase Expense Financing
Let's go! Congrats on the launch 🚀
How long do I need to monitor a prompt before I can get an insight?
Omnia
Hey @gulipad ! Thanks for the comment!
You can generate insights as soon as you start monitoring the prompt, but it's not the best approach. The more monitoring time you have, the more citation data Omnio will have to work with, and the more powerful the insight will be.
Nori
This is cool!! How can I share these actions to other teams?
Omnia
Hey @matiszz ! That's a great one!
Every insight has a shareable button so you can send it to your other marketing teams: Content, SEO, etc.
Omnia
Great work guys!
I’ve tested more than 10 similar services. Everyone focuses on internal website optimization, and very few show which data ChatGPT was trained on, even though external sources are the most important once the site itself is already optimized. Can you show external websites and specific pages on them that were included in the model’s training and where information about us should be added?
Omnia
hello@natalia_iankovych !
It's not only the training data, also the data in the RAG framework.
For instance, I'm attaching here a insight based on a source from a prompt of Nike(citation) from an external website. You can see it here: https://share.useomnia.com/shares/b38b5d07-5ee5-41ac-b125-e6529decccf6.html
@danimirror Yes, I was talking about something slightly different. The texts themselves are fine, but the competition is extremely high. ChatGPT 5.3 used to recommend us constantly, while 5.4 completely stopped, even though we didn’t change anything on the website. We figured out that the issue isn’t the website texts, but the external sources ChatGPT trained on and uses to determine relevance. And that’s exactly where we have a problem...
Strong direction — monitoring without a next action is where teams tend to stall.
One thing I’d look for in the action plan is a clean split between “create or update owned content” and “earn/repair external citations.” They usually have different owners, timelines, and success signals. Are you exposing that split clearly in the plan/export so content, SEO, and partnerships/PR can each pick up their part?
Omnia
Hey @jim_jeffers !
Yes! We "tag" each insight depending on what is the nature of it. Attaching here a few examples of them to show the differences.
@danimirror That’s helpful — the tagging is exactly the piece I was hoping existed.
The next thing I’d watch is whether the insight carries enough “why this owner” context when it gets shared. A content person, SEO lead, and partnerships/PR person may all see the same citation gap, but each needs a different next action and confidence level. If the share/export preserves that owner-specific reasoning, it becomes much easier to hand off instead of just discuss.
That’s helpful — the tagging is exactly the piece I was hoping existed.
The next thing I’d watch is whether the insight carries enough “why this owner” context when it gets shared. A content person, SEO lead, and partnerships/PR person may all see the same citation gap, but each needs a different next action and confidence level. If the share/export preserves that owner-specific reasoning, it becomes much easier to hand off instead of just discuss.
Hey, went through Insights by Omnia and the brand-in-LLM-answers tracking is a smart wedge. one thing I wanted to ask, given LLM outputs vary call to call, how do you measure visibility, are you running sampled prompts on a schedule or do you have something more deterministic under the hood?