Connect with the Product Hunt community

Cubicle, Agent Activity, Singularity and bmux are all, underneath the framing, a place to sit and watch agents do things.

That isn't a category forming, it's a symptom. You only build a cockpit when you don't trust the thing to fly itself. Nobody ever shipped a dashboard for watching their compiler.

Hey all, been a busy week since launch. Here's what's new if you haven't updated in a bit.

Long tooltip

NotchDodo now keeps your clipboard history in the notch

NotchDodo 0.1.24 is out, and the notch now remembers what you copy:

• Your last 20 copies: text, links, images and files

• One click to copy any of them again

• Pinned snippets for the things you paste every day

• Passwords from password managers are never kept

Thank you to everyone who discovered, supported, upvoted and followed Kanverse GPU Borrow during our Product Hunt launch.

We now have our first 13 followers here. That may be a small beginning, but for an experimental technology project, it means a lot to us.

What is Kanverse?

Kanverse is an independent experimental technology lab where we build and test ideas around distributed computing, AI agents, device collaboration, security and new ways for computers and phones to share capabilities.

ShipHQ has 40+ trophies right now: first $100, first 100 paying customers, a 30-day streak... But I picked them from my own small wins, and I know your journey looks different.

What's the milestone you'd actually want hanging on your wall? The weird ones count too: the first refund you survived, the first review from a stranger, the first sale that came in while you were asleep.

I'll build the best ones next

A scan of 1.2 billion URLs found 15.3K validated prompt injections sitting on live pages, and about 70% of them are in HTML you never render. The fix most teams reach for - strip the page to plain text before you send it - is the worst of the four options tested.

Two of the last three things I've written here were about reading the primary document instead of the coverage. This one is about a paper almost nobody covered, which is worse, because it changes a line of code a lot of us shipped this year without thinking about it.

been thinking about this lately. as someone who tests multiple development setups and dashboards every week, setting up environment variables and basic routing always feels more tedious than it should be.

found myself spending an hour just configuring boilerplate files yesterday before even testing the actual core features.

do you use custom scripts to speed this up, or just manually set everything from scratch each time?

Hi, I'm Rikin, maker of dotpals (a small open-source pal that shows what your AI coding agents did). Most people seem to use Jev for lead-gen and booking calls. I'm using it for something different: as a judge for test results. My coding agent says "All tests pass. Done!" far too often. dotpals reads the test runner's own output first, and when the output and the exit code disagree, it sends Jev a short, redacted snippet and asks one question: "did these tests pass?"

It answers in about 0.2 seconds with a probability. In the first day it caught a real false "pass" (a run where the tests never actually ran) at 92% certainty, and it rated our own 148-test suite as passed, 98% sure.

For the last six months, my co-founder and I have been building in public. We post our weekly revenue, our struggles, and our wins on X (Twitter) and LinkedIn. It s been amazing for building a community, getting feedback, and finding our first 50 customers.

But last week, I had a sales call that completely shifted my perspective.

We were pitching a mid-sized client a $99/month plan. They loved the product, the workflow was a perfect fit, and the demo went flawlessly. Then, the prospect said, "I saw your tweet last week that you re only at $300 MRR. You guys are way too small. What happens to my data if you shut down next month?"

I was speechless. The transparency that I thought was our biggest strength had just become our biggest liability. I realized that while the indie hacker community loves seeing the "0 to $10k" journey, actual businesses want to buy from companies that look stable, established, and safe. They don't want to be your beta testers; they want a guarantee that you'll be around in two years.

A pricing update is more than changing one card. Keep plan allowances consistent across cards, comparison tables and FAQs while retaining the useful design.

This guide combines a concise plan brief, scoped AI edits and visual HTML editing for precise finishing work. It also includes a review checklist for repeated values, links and layout.

Read the guide:

https://htmldrag.com/blog/how-to...

If you like the idea of bringing the best design tools, inspiration and people into one place, I'd truly appreciate your support

An upvote helps Designeer reach more builders and designers.
I'll be working really hard to improve and make Designeer big :)
Link : https://www.producthunt.com/prod...

@adamwathan has announced that Tailwind Labs is joining Shopify:

Tailwind is a [very important part] of the stack at Shopify, and they're invested in making sure it's actively maintained and continues to improve and adapt for how the ways we build are changing.

Like most SaaS startups, we offer a free tier. We thought it was a great way to build goodwill, get feedback, and let people test the product before upgrading.

But last month, I finally sat down and looked at our support desk analytics. One single free user had opened 32 support tickets over the course of three weeks.

They weren't reporting bugs. They were asking us to walk them through how to use Excel, asking for custom API endpoints, and requesting that we build a specific feature just for their use case. I spent hours on Zoom calls with them and writing detailed custom scripts for their workflow. When I calculated the time my small team spent helping them against our hourly burn rate, it was roughly $4,000 of pure support cost.

And at the end of it all? They refused to upgrade to our $29/month paid plan because "the free version does everything I need now."

Tanay and I had actually decided to postpone our Product Hunt relaunch indefinitely.

There was just one problem.

We forgot to unscheduled it.

So at 12:30 PM today, while both of us were out of town, Bracket launched itself

Localization infrastructure is now in one place.

Infrastructure is where you configure localization engines, models, context, pipelines, and everything else that controls how your content gets translated.

Here's what you'll find there:

Localization engines. Create separate localization engines for different kinds of content. Your product UI, help center, and legal content can each have their own setup, models, context, and localization pipeline.

This is a current hot topic on Twitter.

A particular guy was complaining about too generous employee care system in Netherlands.
(I am not Dutch, so I do not know the exact rules, but as for me, no system is completely fair to anybody.)
I know that without written rules, either employees or employers can exploit it.

We route across 30+ models and for a while the picker just swapped silently. Someone asks for a video, we choose what we think is right, they get a result. Clean, and wrong.

A user can't tell the difference between a deliberate routing decision and a model having a bad day. The output changes, the price changes, and nothing on screen explains either one, so the conclusion they reach is that the product got worse.

So the picker now names what it chose and why before it runs, in one line. It makes the thing look less magic, and I think that's the right trade. Silent routing is the same bet as a silent retry or a silent price change. It holds while the output is good, and the first time it isn't, you've taught someone to distrust the whole product instead of one model.

If you auto route anything, agent, model or tool, do you show the user what got picked, or does it happen behind the curtain?

Thank you for the #5 of the day three weeks ago. Since then we shipped four releases (1.4.8 to 1.5.1). The biggest changes:

- Bring your plan, not just your keys. Sign in with your Claude or ChatGPT account and the agents run on the subscription you already pay for. API keys, OpenRouter, NVIDIA and Ollama still work, with zero markup.

- Ollama installs itself. Pick a local model and Airuncode sets up and manages the server for you.

- Pull requests inside the app. CI status, checks, reviews and diffs, then checkout or merge.

The Digital Omnibus pushed high-risk obligations out to December 2027. Article 50 transparency was not pushed anywhere - it applies now. And if your generative feature shipped before 2 August, your marking deadline is 2 December, twelve weeks out.

Every summary I read of the Digital Omnibus said some version of "Brussels blinks, AI Act delayed." That's accurate about the part of the Act most small teams will never touch, and misleading about the part most of us are already inside. I went and read the Commission's own pages this week rather than the coverage, and the gap between the two is wide enough to be worth twenty minutes of your time.

Every product has that one auth decision that made complete sense at the time, but became a pain to change later.

Maybe you set sessions to 30 days because users hated logging in again.

Since version 1.2, Local Music Organizer has received several substantial updates.

The biggest addition is a built in audio player for local music files. It includes a live spectrum analyzer, waveform display, album artwork, playback queue, Previous and Next controls, Play, Pause, Stop, seeking, volume control and automatic playback of the next track.

The player can work with the current playlist context and includes direct navigation through the Music.app playlist hierarchy. There is also a compact Mini Player and a Classic interface inspired by traditional hi fi hardware.

Playlist Compare has been improved significantly. Changes made manually in Music.app are now synchronized more reliably. The app can detect when a track is replaced in a playlist even if the total number of tracks stays the same. Metadata changes are refreshed automatically, stale comparison results are removed after Refresh Music Changes, and a comparison is cleared if one of the selected playlists is deleted.

@Mastra recently launched their open-source, configurable software factory.

If you gave it a spin and created your account, you might have received this email from their CEO @calcsam.

Meta question, but it's been on my mind since I had a post rejected and, rereading it, agreed with the rejection.

The difference I've landed on: content is written to be agreed with. An insight is written to be argued with. Content says "here are five lessons." An insight says "here's the one thing I believe that you might not, and here's why."

The test I now run before posting: could someone reasonably disagree with this? If not, it's content. If yes, and I can defend it, it's worth posting.

I'm curious whether other people have their own test, especially people who post here regularly and don't get rejected. What's the thing you check before hitting submit?

Hi, I have added .wsz skins support for GhostDeck, so you can use any old skin that you remember from days back, or even create your own. Does someone want to test it via TestFlight before it's release in the coming week?

Apple's App Review Guidelines say you must disclose where personal data goes to third-party AI and get explicit permission first. A privacy policy paragraph doesn't do that.

Most of us read Apple's November 2025 guideline update, saw "AI" in it, and filed it under things for the big players. I did too, until I reread it as someone who sends people's journal entries to a language model.