... about the quality of feedback. Maybe the harder part is creating an environment where people feel okay being honest even if they like or respect the builder. Comment from Kabir Salunkhe(@kabirsalunkhe): Feels like it s not brand vs product but what you re actually building trust in. If people follow you for opinions, they ll show up early but they ll also leave fast if the product doesn t hold up. If they discover you through the product, trust ... ... first approach is IMV mostly just self-promotion with nothing behind it. Shipping something real and useful (probably quite hard nowadays, hahaha) at least gives people a reason to care about the person who built it Comment from Mihail(@sweepbase

... clearly define your target audience: Who are they? What's their knowledge level? What market are they in? What kind of content do they usually consume? What content actually works for them? This is essentially user profiling combined with competitor analysis. Back when we were creating educational content, we'd put a ton of effort into user interviews, benchmarking against others, and even using a PBL (Project-Based Learning) approach to constantly refine our content structure ... ... work, but it really paid off. Let Go of the "Masterpiece" Obsession. We often tend to equate "good content" with some grand, sweeping

... just works insanely well. Comment from Tijs Teulings(@_tijs): Claude code has been available in the default Claude plan for a while now. Limited tokens per day but enough to get shit done. It integrates quite well with both vscode and cursor so I actually use both. When you run the Claude command in a cursor terminal you can easily set it up with the dedicated Claude code command which will add a little Claude button to your editor. Tapping ... ... anyway, it's just making you feel safer while you approve changes you can't actually evaluate Comment from Katrina Rodriguez(@katrinarodriguez): I love Cursor too, but lately it feels like it's slowing down and making wide-sweeping