PaymentKit is a multi-processor billing platform for SaaS and e-commerce. It routes payments across processors, vaults tokens independently, and keeps subscriptions billing even if a MID gets shut down. No code to launch, full API when you need it.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for PaymentKit
The dashboard could be surprisingly valuable too. seening approval rates and fees across processors might reveal problems you simply cant see with one provider.
@charles_eric3 Yesss! The first time people see approval rates side by side, they usually find one processor quietly underperforming on a specific card brand or country. Impossible to see when there's only one line on the chart
Report
Keeping payment tokens independent feels like an important detail that could make future processor changes much easier.
@lucy_rolff@diego_vidal10 We're also one of the only payment orchestrators that can seamlessly migrate Apple Pay and Google Pay subscriptions between processors
Report
This feels less like a payment feature and more like business continuity infrastructure especially for subscription heavy SaaS.
@jackson_reed90 That's how we think about it internally too. Nobody wakes up wanting payment orchestration. They don't want to have a day where revenue stops
Report
Love the resilience angle here. Keeping subscriptions running during disruptions is huge.
@ryankeller Agreed, and the risk is invisible right up until it isn't. Nobody prices in a processor decision they've never had to reverse
Report
Payment reliability does not get enough attention until billing suddenly stops working. Building resilience into the payment layer from the beginning seems like a much better approach than reacting after a shutdown.
@jason_scott8 Well put. Setting it up beforehand takes an afternoon. Reacting after a shutdown costs you a chunk of your subscriber base, and you don't get those back
The dashboard could be surprisingly valuable too. seening approval rates and fees across processors might reveal problems you simply cant see with one provider.
PaymentKit
@charles_eric3 Yesss! The first time people see approval rates side by side, they usually find one processor quietly underperforming on a specific card brand or country. Impossible to see when there's only one line on the chart
Keeping payment tokens independent feels like an important detail that could make future processor changes much easier.
PaymentKit
@lucy_rolff It's the detail everything else depends on. Routing, failover, migrations, none of it works if someone else holds the tokens
PaymentKit
@lucy_rolff @diego_vidal10 We're also one of the only payment orchestrators that can seamlessly migrate Apple Pay and Google Pay subscriptions between processors
This feels less like a payment feature and more like business continuity infrastructure especially for subscription heavy SaaS.
PaymentKit
@jackson_reed90 That's how we think about it internally too. Nobody wakes up wanting payment orchestration. They don't want to have a day where revenue stops
Love the resilience angle here. Keeping subscriptions running during disruptions is huge.
PaymentKit
@noahanderson Appreciate your comment Noah!
Smart approach to reducing processor dependency. This could save teams a lot of headaches.
PaymentKit
@new_user___209202627e87af67bf41b28 That's exactly the point! Thanks Rohit
Really interesting approach to making billing more resilient. Processor dependency is a bigger risk than many teams realize.
PaymentKit
@ryankeller Agreed, and the risk is invisible right up until it isn't. Nobody prices in a processor decision they've never had to reverse
Payment reliability does not get enough attention until billing suddenly stops working. Building resilience into the payment layer from the beginning seems like a much better approach than reacting after a shutdown.
PaymentKit
@jason_scott8 Well put. Setting it up beforehand takes an afternoon. Reacting after a shutdown costs you a chunk of your subscriber base, and you don't get those back