PaymentKit is a multi-processor billing platform for SaaS and e-commerce. It routes payments across processors, vaults tokens independently, and keeps subscriptions billing even if a MID gets shut down. No code to launch, full API when you need it.
Hey everyone, Diego here from the PaymentKit team.
Quick story on where this came from, because it explains most of the product.
PaymentKit didn't start as a startup idea. We built it for ourselves. Our parent company runs a portfolio of subscription brands, and for years we kept hitting the same three problems: billing lived in one tool, payments in another, and revenue data in a third. Every processor change meant a migration. Every decline was money we never saw again. And all of it sat on top of a single processor whose risk team could change our business overnight.
We couldn't find anything that solved all three together, so we built it and ran our own volume through it before selling it to anyone.
What it actually does:
Payment orchestration: Connect the processors you already use. Every transaction routes to the one most likely to approve it, and soft declines cascade to the next one automatically instead of turning into lost revenue.
Independent vaulting: The part we care most about. Cards, Apple Pay and Google Pay are all vaulted as network tokens under your control, not your processor's. You can add or drop a processor without asking a single customer to re enter anything, and if a MID gets shut down your subscribers never feel it.
Subscription billing: Flat, tiered, usage based or hybrid pricing. Hosted checkout and self service portals, live without writing code.
Revenue metrics: One dashboard across every processor, so you can compare success rates and fees side by side instead of stitching exports together.
Why I think this community in particular might care: a lot of you are running SaaS or digital products on a single processor, or on a merchant of record that owns your customer data and your tokens. That works right up until it doesn't. We're the layer that makes that decision reversible.
It goes live in under an hour on top of what you already have, and there's a free trial if you want to poke at it.
Would really like to hear from anyone who's been through a processor shutdown, a rolling reserve, or a migration that broke their subscriptions. What did you wish existed at that moment?
Report
Independent vaulting is the claim I'd want spelled out. Network tokens are provisioned against a token requestor, so whether they're portable depends entirely on who the requestor of record is, and Apple Pay and Google Pay DPANs make that messier rather than cleaner. If it's you and not the processor, put that sentence on the page, it's the difference between a real escape hatch and a vault you still can't leave with. Worth naming which processors you've actually moved live volume between too, not which ones you support.
Report
@diego_vidal10 This is a genuinely practical problem to solve. The independent token vault+ multi processor routing is especially interesting processor shutdowns can become a huge operational headache for SaaS businesses. Nice launch.
Report
Interesting idea, but curious how refunds, disputes, and reporting work when everything is spread across multiple processors.
Report
How much control do we get over feedback attempts?
Report
I've dealt with payment migrations before. getting customers to update cards is painful, so this solves a real headache.
Report
The token ownership part is interesting. that's usually the thing that makes switching providers difficult.
PaymentKit
Hey everyone, Diego here from the PaymentKit team.
Quick story on where this came from, because it explains most of the product.
PaymentKit didn't start as a startup idea. We built it for ourselves. Our parent company runs a portfolio of subscription brands, and for years we kept hitting the same three problems: billing lived in one tool, payments in another, and revenue data in a third. Every processor change meant a migration. Every decline was money we never saw again. And all of it sat on top of a single processor whose risk team could change our business overnight.
We couldn't find anything that solved all three together, so we built it and ran our own volume through it before selling it to anyone.
What it actually does:
Payment orchestration: Connect the processors you already use. Every transaction routes to the one most likely to approve it, and soft declines cascade to the next one automatically instead of turning into lost revenue.
Independent vaulting: The part we care most about. Cards, Apple Pay and Google Pay are all vaulted as network tokens under your control, not your processor's. You can add or drop a processor without asking a single customer to re enter anything, and if a MID gets shut down your subscribers never feel it.
Subscription billing: Flat, tiered, usage based or hybrid pricing. Hosted checkout and self service portals, live without writing code.
Revenue metrics: One dashboard across every processor, so you can compare success rates and fees side by side instead of stitching exports together.
Why I think this community in particular might care: a lot of you are running SaaS or digital products on a single processor, or on a merchant of record that owns your customer data and your tokens. That works right up until it doesn't. We're the layer that makes that decision reversible.
It goes live in under an hour on top of what you already have, and there's a free trial if you want to poke at it.
Would really like to hear from anyone who's been through a processor shutdown, a rolling reserve, or a migration that broke their subscriptions. What did you wish existed at that moment?
Independent vaulting is the claim I'd want spelled out. Network tokens are provisioned against a token requestor, so whether they're portable depends entirely on who the requestor of record is, and Apple Pay and Google Pay DPANs make that messier rather than cleaner. If it's you and not the processor, put that sentence on the page, it's the difference between a real escape hatch and a vault you still can't leave with. Worth naming which processors you've actually moved live volume between too, not which ones you support.
@diego_vidal10 This is a genuinely practical problem to solve. The independent token vault+ multi processor routing is especially interesting processor shutdowns can become a huge operational headache for SaaS businesses. Nice launch.
Interesting idea, but curious how refunds, disputes, and reporting work when everything is spread across multiple processors.
How much control do we get over feedback attempts?
I've dealt with payment migrations before. getting customers to update cards is painful, so this solves a real headache.
The token ownership part is interesting. that's usually the thing that makes switching providers difficult.