Reviewers mostly see Cursor as a strong AI coding editor that fits naturally into daily development: the VS Code-based workflow feels familiar, while codebase-aware autocomplete, inline diffs, debugging help, and multi-file editing consistently speed up refactors, boilerplate, and feature work. Founders of Product Hunt, Basedash: AI data analyst, and Locofy.ai also praise its editor integrations and context-aware editing for faster iteration. The main complaints are predictable: high or confusing usage costs, heavy resource use on large repos, occasional stale context or hallucinated edits, and frequent updates or minor stability issues.

+970

Summarized with AI

Pros

seamless integration (20)

code generation (19)

intelligent code suggestions (18)

context aware (17)

AI autocomplete (16)

fast performance (12)

pair programming (11)

error detection (9)

VS Code integration (9)

real-time debugging (7)

Cons

subscription cost (9)

context aware (3)

high memory usage (3)

frequent updates (2)

occasional crashes (2)

VS Code integration (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (901)

Other Reviews (60)

used Cursor to build Product Forums (p/)

instead of Windsurf, opencode, and others

•8 reviews

What's great

context aware (17)AI autocomplete (16)code generation (19)VS Code integration (9)intelligent code suggestions (18)multiple ai models (2)

Cursor is one of the original AI code editors (2023 was a long time ago!) and has stood the test of time. It's a VS Code fork, which was key for me. I lean on @VS Code extensions and custom shortcuts. I was able to keep all of them (there is a migration assistant) when moving over to Cursor.

Cursor is very much an editor for looking at code as opposed to a vibe coding tool like @v0 by Vercel. My typical modes of using cursor are:

Describe a feature or a bug using Agent mode in the right sidebar.
Review diff + use AI autocomplete in editor.

I review every line of code an agent outputs. And I find myself editing code quite a bit. The agent still outputs code that is too verbose and, sometimes, not maintainable.

The price is nice too. $20/month is very reasonable.

What needs improvement

I find 3 issues with the Auto model mode (as opposed to selecting a specific model):

It can be very verbose. This is where @Claude Code is much better.
Fails on complex problems. I end up selecting gpt-5 manually for these.
Kind of slow. @opencode with Grok Code seems at least 10x faster for simple prompts.

Also, I don't love using a dated fork of VS Code. I have been considering switching to VS Code + @Github Copilot extension since then I would be on the latest, vanilla VS Code.

Finally, Cursor also asks to be updated almost every day, which requires a restart. I like being on the latest software. But the restarts are very annoying. I run dev servers in the in-editor terminal. So I end up needing to restart the dev server every time I restart the editor.

vs Alternatives

Windsurf

opencode

Claude Code

I still use Claude Code quite a bit in a Cursor built-in terminal actually. But it's hard to beat all the editor integrations Cursor includes. Claude Code has just option+cmd+k.

I kicked the tires on OpenCode and really liked it. OpenCode is a terminal agent. So I didn't stick with it.

I used Windsurf for a while, and Windsurf felt like a magical upgrade over Cursor. Over time, it felt like Cursor caught up and then passed Windsurf. Honestly though, I haven't tried Windsurf in a while. Maybe it has advantages over Cursor again?

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

1.7K views12mo ago

Bench for Claude Code

•5 reviews