Claude Code

Name: Claude Code
Rating: 5.0 (148 reviews)

Anthropic’s deep-context AI coder

5.0•148 reviews•

1.8K followers

Anthropic’s deep-context AI coder

5.0•148 reviews•

1.8K followers

•

•

•

Anthropic’s AI coding assistant, designed for deep context understanding and capable of handling complex software tasks with a massive context window (up to 200K tokens).

Have a question about Claude Code? Ask it here and get a real answer.

Auth0 — Start building with Auth0 for AI Agents, now generally available.

Start building with Auth0 for AI Agents, now generally available.

Promoted

Claude Code Launches

Claude Memory Bringing memory to teams at work

Launched on September 12th, 2025

Do you use Claude Code?

Forum Threads

p/claude-code

•

4mo ago

[Proposal] Bridge Memory: Safely “borrow” context across projects

TL;DR

Bridge Memory is a feature idea for Claude (Anthropic s AI assistant) that lets devs temporarily pull in read-only context ( Memory Chips ) from other projects for a single thread so you can reuse standards, snippets, and runbooks without leaking data or polluting memories.

What it is

* Memory Chips (ephemeral): Add chips like Project A Auth Patterns or Project X Incident Runbook while composing.

p/claude-code

•

6mo ago

Agents in Claude Code

Could anyone provide insights into the new version of Claude code that separates Back End, Front End, and Dev Ops? I would appreciate any encountered challenges or potential pitfalls.

View all

Newsletter Apps About FAQ Terms Privacy & Cookies Privacy Choices Advertise llms.txtContact us: hello@producthunt.com

5.0

Based on 148 reviews

Review Claude Code?

Reviews praise Claude Code for strong reasoning, long-context handling, and clean, style-aware patches that speed up refactors, tests, and frontend work. Makers of

Pipedream

KushoAI

, and

Conductor

credit it with faster iteration, day-to-day development, and even powering core systems. Other makers highlight reliable pair-programming, context across files, and reduced manual work. Users echo intuitive UX and reliable output, though a minority expected more agentic autonomy. Overall, sentiment centers on productivity, coherence on large codebases, and dependable, senior-like guidance.

+148

Summarized with AI

Pros

code generation (10)

complex software tasks (8)

massive context window (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•6 reviews

What's great

code generation (10)massive context window (2)complex software tasks (8)

Claude Code is an exceptional AI coding agent that excels across the full spectrum—from rapid startup SaaS builds to enterprise-grade, multi-layered, complex applications. When provided with proper context and guided by fundamental software architecture, engineering principles, and security standards, it consistently delivers high-quality results. Used with common sense and real development experience, there is currently no better AI coding agent in my opinion.

What needs improvement

Claude Code CLI is already seamless and consistently delivers high-quality results. The main area for improvement would be deeper scalability toward a full agentic development environment (ADE), similar to what tools like Warp are evolving toward—bringing more autonomous workflows, richer context management, and tighter developer-environment integration.

vs Alternatives

Warp

Codex by OpenAI

Grok Code Fast 1

I evaluated Warp, OpenAI Codex, and Grok Code Fast1, but Claude Code stood out for its balance of control, context awareness, and consistent output quality. It scales equally well from rapid prototyping to complex, enterprise-grade systems, while remaining predictable and effective when guided by solid engineering and security practices—making it the most reliable choice overall.

Can it run tests and surface failures with clear diffs?

Yes

How controllable are shell commands and file writes?

Safety and control are highly configurable and depend largely on how the user sets rules, permissions, and execution boundaries. The level of control ultimately reflects the user’s proficiency and discipline in configuring and operating the tool, making this a largely subjective assessment rather than a fixed limitation of Cloud Code itself.

Does it handle long reasoning without timing out?

Yes

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

63 views30d ago

•1 review

What's great

code generation (10)

Thanks to the Claude Code team for building such a great product — it really makes a software engineer’s life easier. It is impressive. Once you clearly define the problem, it often delivers an almost perfect solution — sometimes even better — especially if you already have a few unit or integration tests in place. In most cases, with just a bit of debugging and some error context, it gets about an 85% approval rate from senior engineers.

What needs improvement

It still struggles a bit with frontend web code, but that’s mostly because frontend details are harder to describe precisely and harder to verify automatically.

vs Alternatives

Gemini

Cursor

almost perfect if you're clear about the solution. almost hand free once you describe the requirement clear. comparing to other , approve rate is much higher than others.

What guardrails prevent destructive commands or data loss?

should be prompt or popup for some commands, might also need not allow command set in rules.

How well does it maintain coding style and lint rules?

good if with claude.json rulesset

How transparent is cost when using extended reasoning budgets?

reasonable. and transparent

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

62 views3mo ago

used this to build

Termdock

(125 points)

•3 reviews

Claude Code is an excellent AI assistant for development. For Termdock, it delivers stable performance in long‑context understanding, structured refactoring, and controllable command generation—well suited to our terminal‑driven, multi‑workspace workflow. In practice, we use it to write and review scripts, generate test cases, summarize multi‑project changes into reviewable patches, and provide safe change suggestions for Git‑isolation scenarios. We evaluated Cursor, Windsurf, and Copilot / Copilot Chat. They offer strong inline completion and great in‑IDE experiences, but we prioritize long‑context reasoning, controllable command responses, and stability in terminal workflows. Therefore, we mainly chose Claude Code to align with Termdock’s approach: terminal‑centric with workspaces as logical boundaries to ensure stability and speed when running multiple projects in parallel.

Report

44 views3mo ago

•6 reviews

What's great

code generation (10)massive context window (2)complex software tasks (8)

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Warp

Codex by OpenAI

Grok Code Fast 1

Can it run tests and surface failures with clear diffs?

Yes

How controllable are shell commands and file writes?

Does it handle long reasoning without timing out?

Yes

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

63 views30d ago

•1 review

What's great

code generation (10)

What needs improvement

It still struggles a bit with frontend web code, but that’s mostly because frontend details are harder to describe precisely and harder to verify automatically.

vs Alternatives

Gemini

Cursor

almost perfect if you're clear about the solution. almost hand free once you describe the requirement clear. comparing to other , approve rate is much higher than others.

What guardrails prevent destructive commands or data loss?

should be prompt or popup for some commands, might also need not allow command set in rules.

How well does it maintain coding style and lint rules?

good if with claude.json rulesset

How transparent is cost when using extended reasoning budgets?

reasonable. and transparent

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

62 views3mo ago

used this to build

Termdock

(125 points)

•3 reviews

Report

44 views3mo ago

Claude Code

Anthropic’s deep-context AI coder

Anthropic’s deep-context AI coder

Have a question about Claude Code? Ask it here and get a real answer.

Claude Code Launches

Do you use Claude Code?

Forum Threads

[Proposal] Bridge Memory: Safely “borrow” context across projects

Agents in Claude Code

Trending categories

Top reviewed

Trending products

Top forum threads

Trending categories

Top reviewed

Trending products

Top forum threads

Have a question about Claude Code? Ask it here and get a real answer.

Claude Code Launches

Do you use Claude Code?

Forum Threads

[Proposal] Bridge Memory: Safely “borrow” context across projects

Agents in Claude Code

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Can it run tests and surface failures with clear diffs?

How controllable are shell commands and file writes?

Does it handle long reasoning without timing out?

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What guardrails prevent destructive commands or data loss?

How well does it maintain coding style and lint rules?

How transparent is cost when using extended reasoning budgets?

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Can it run tests and surface failures with clear diffs?

How controllable are shell commands and file writes?

Does it handle long reasoning without timing out?

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

What guardrails prevent destructive commands or data loss?

How well does it maintain coding style and lint rules?

How transparent is cost when using extended reasoning budgets?