What's great
Cursor has become one of the most reliable tools in my development workflow. It fits naturally into the way I already write and manage code, and the integration feels smooth from the moment you start using it.
The code suggestions are accurate, context-aware, and genuinely helpful. It works well whether I am writing new features, cleaning up older code, or testing. The speed is consistent, and the editor responds quickly, which makes the entire experience feel efficient.
The autocomplete and code generation features save a noticeable amount of time. It almost works like a quiet assistant in the bac
k
ground, offering improvements without interrupting my flow. Real-time debugging and error detection are strong additions and help resolve issues much faster.
I have attached a few screenshots of Cursor in use to show how it fits into a normal coding environment.
vs Alternatives
I tested a few other AI-assisted coding tools, but Cursor stood out because of how well it integrates into the actual development workflow. It doesn’t feel like a separate layer added on top of the editor. The editing experience, speed, and context awareness are noticeably better than the alternatives I tried.
Cursor also handles full-file and multi-file changes more reliably, which makes it practical for real projects rather than just small tasks. The balance between automation and control is what convinced me to choose it. It speeds up the work without taking away the flexibility of writing code the way I prefer.
Do multi-location edits work reliably on large codebases?
In my experience, multi-location edits work well even in larger projects. Cursor handles related changes across multiple files without losing context, and most edits remain consistent. There are rare moments where it misses one or two references, but overall the feature is reliable and saves a lot of manual effort.
Is privacy mode sufficient for sensitive or proprietary code?
Privacy mode is designed well for handling sensitive code, and it does provide a level of comfort when working with private or client projects. It keeps data local and avoids uploading anything externally. For most use cases, this is sufficient, though developers working with highly confidential material may still want to review their own internal policies.
Are inline diagnostics accurate and actionable?
The inline diagnostics are generally accurate and helpful. Cursor highlights issues with clear explanations, and the suggestions are usually on point. It identifies common mistakes quickly and provides fixes that make sense in the context of the code. It’s not perfect in every case, but the accuracy is strong enough to trust during daily work.