Reviewers mostly see Cursor as a fast, context-aware coding tool that fits directly into everyday development, helping them write, refactor, debug, and ship faster with less context switching. Users repeatedly praise its codebase understanding, smooth workflow, and strong multi-file edits, often preferring it to Copilot or other AI editors. Makers of Product Hunt and Vozo AI — Video localization also say it works well for rapid prototyping. The main complaints are cost and pricing confusion, occasional slowness or instability, token burn, and output that can be overly verbose or still needs careful review.

+843

Summarized with AI

Pros

seamless integration (18)

intelligent code suggestions (14)

code generation (13)

context aware (13)

AI autocomplete (12)

fast performance (9)

pair programming (8)

VS Code integration (7)

error detection (6)

real-time debugging (5)

Cons

subscription cost (6)

high memory usage (2)

occasional crashes (2)

Pros

Cons

AppSignalGet the APM insights you need without enterprise price tags.

Productivity•Analytics•Developer Tools

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (783)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (53)

View all

used Cursor to build Product Forums (p/)

instead of Windsurf, opencode, and others

•8 reviews

What's great

context aware (13)AI autocomplete (12)code generation (13)VS Code integration (7)intelligent code suggestions (14)multiple ai models (2)

Cursor is one of the original AI code editors (2023 was a long time ago!) and has stood the test of time. It's a VS Code fork, which was key for me. I lean on @VS Code extensions and custom shortcuts. I was able to keep all of them (there is a migration assistant) when moving over to Cursor.

Cursor is very much an editor for looking at code as opposed to a vibe coding tool like @v0 by Vercel. My typical modes of using cursor are:

Describe a feature or a bug using Agent mode in the right sidebar.
Review diff + use AI autocomplete in editor.

I review every line of code an agent outputs. And I find myself editing code quite a bit. The agent still outputs code that is too verbose and, sometimes, not maintainable.

The price is nice too. $20/month is very reasonable.

What needs improvement

I find 3 issues with the Auto model mode (as opposed to selecting a specific model):

It can be very verbose. This is where @Claude Code is much better.
Fails on complex problems. I end up selecting gpt-5 manually for these.
Kind of slow. @opencode with Grok Code seems at least 10x faster for simple prompts.

Also, I don't love using a dated fork of VS Code. I have been considering switching to VS Code + @Github Copilot extension since then I would be on the latest, vanilla VS Code.

Finally, Cursor also asks to be updated almost every day, which requires a restart. I like being on the latest software. But the restarts are very annoying. I run dev servers in the in-editor terminal. So I end up needing to restart the dev server every time I restart the editor.

vs Alternatives

Windsurf

opencode

Claude Code

I still use Claude Code quite a bit in a Cursor built-in terminal actually. But it's hard to beat all the editor integrations Cursor includes. Claude Code has just option+cmd+k.

I kicked the tires on OpenCode and really liked it. OpenCode is a terminal agent. So I didn't stick with it.

I used Windsurf for a while, and Windsurf felt like a magical upgrade over Cursor. Over time, it felt like Cursor caught up and then passed Windsurf. Honestly though, I haven't tried Windsurf in a while. Maybe it has advantages over Cursor again?

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

782 views7mo ago

Bench for Claude Code

•5 reviews