Google Antigravity

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•15 reviews•

1.1K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.8•15 reviews•

1.1K followers

Visit website

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Google Antigravity Reviews

Name: Google Antigravity
Rating: 4.8 (15 reviews)

The community submitted 15 reviews to tell us what they like about Google Antigravity, what Google Antigravity can do better, and more.

4.8

Based on 15 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviewers describe Google Antigravity as a strong productivity tool that is easy to use, fast, and especially good at explaining code, planning implementations, and helping people explore ideas or handle complex tasks. Users also say it works well for mockups, infrastructure and API work, and broader workflows, though some prefer single-task use over its agent manager. The main complaints are minor UI bugs, rough polish, weaker handling of larger multi-file projects, and occasional limits or model fallback. Founders from Socra and Dropy also praise its parallel agents for feature design and backend work.

+12

Summarized with AI

AppSignalGet the APM insights you need without enterprise price tags.

Promoted

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (10)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (5)

View all

•1 review

What's great

For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.

What needs improvement

Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.

vs Alternatives

I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

88 views4mo ago

•1 review

What's great

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

What needs improvement

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

vs Alternatives

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

13 views2mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Github Copilot

Claude Code

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

87 views5mo ago

•2 reviews

What's great

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

What needs improvement

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

67 views6mo ago

•1 review

What's great

For a non tech BA / PM, Google Antigravity is extremely helpful to draft ideas, interactive mockup. I find it easy to use and the generating time is fast.

vs Alternatives

Good free tier to try out

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

3 views28d ago