What’s Your Vibe Coding Stack in 2025?
by•
AI dev tools are evolving crazy fast , every few weeks there’s a new “must-try” for vibe coders.
Some people are building full products with @ChatGPT by OpenAI and @Replit , others swear by @Cursor and @Claude by Anthropic , and a few are mixing @Lovable + @v0 by Vercel + @bolt.new to ship apps in record time.
I’ve been refining my own vibe stack lately, trying to find that sweet spot between speed, control, and creativity.
It made me wonder ,what does your setup look like right now?
Share your current “Vibe Stack”:
Your go-to AI tools
How you connect them together
What kind of projects you’re shipping
Let’s crowd-source the best combos for 2025 . Who knows, maybe we’ll spot the next trend before it blows up.
2.2K views
Replies
The "vibe stack" shuffle is the new cardio for builders, and the speed is getting slightly addictive! My core is Cursor paired with Claude for heavy lifting, using v0 and Figma for instant UI polish. I bridge them by feeding component logic directly into Cursor’s composer to skip the manual styling tax. It’s the ultimate shortcut for shipping polished MVPs while the "vibe" is still fresh and strong.
What’s the one tool in your current stack that you absolutely refuse to swap out right now?
Great thread — here's my current stack:
Claude for architecture decisions and complex logic (the reasoning on edge cases is hard to beat), Cursor for day-to-day coding with full repo context, and v0 for spinning up UI components fast when I don't want to think about Tailwind.
What I've noticed: the real unlock isn't any single tool, it's knowing when to switch. Claude to think, Cursor to build, v0 to prototype visually.
I'm shipping a B2B API monitoring tool (apiais.site) — solo founder, so the stack needs to let me move fast without accumulating debt I can't pay back later. The combo above gives me that balance.
Curious if anyone's found a good way to handle state management and multi-file refactors with vibe coding — that's still where I feel friction.
The “vibe stack” is basically becoming a personal OS for builders now.
Right now I’m leaning on ChatGPT for ideation + debugging, Cursor for rapid coding, and Vercel for instant shipping.
For quick UI + MVPs, mixing v0 with lightweight tools has been a game changer.
Mostly building micro-tools and SEO-driven web apps — speed + iteration is everything right now.
The Claude Code + Replit combo has made my life easier by bringing my app ideas to fruition in 2026. I built apps related to NASA Artemis projects, F1 racing cars, an LLM wiki, etc. But my best work was AuthentaLink - a professional networking app built on Replit and refactored by Claude Code into an enterprise-grade platform. We utilized some vibe coding approach to generate ideas and enhancing the UI using react.js and typescripts.
claude code and a few skills
supabase and vercel are by default.
how has your vibe coding stack, changed in these past 6 months?
For me, as long as it's comfortable to use and suits my needs, that's enough. I'm always trying out tools that suit me, and currently, Claude Chat + Claude Code + Deepseek API works well for me. My tech stack is Vue3 + Nuxtjs + Cloudflare, and I focus on providing web tools and app products with pure front-end or minimal back-end services. I currently have a pipeline website for batch image processing, and I'll also try out some fun little tools in the future.
Claude Code and Claude Design are both my main workhorses. Jump into another LLM of choice if I need a double check or want a different perspective. Not sure if Claude Design gets the love it deserves, I think it is very good!
memi
My stack depends on the job: Claude/Codex for deeper implementation, v0 or similar tools for fast UI starts, Cursor for codebase-aware edits, and GitHub/Linear to keep the work grounded. The real unlock is not one tool, it’s moving cleanly from idea to diff to test.
Loomal
Current stack for building dev/agent infra:
Claude Code — primary coding agent, handles the heavy lifting across sessions. The long-context + tool-use combo is what makes it different from autocomplete.
Cursor — when I want to pair-program rather than fully delegate.
Supabase — backend/DB. The RLS + pg functions combo is underrated for moving fast.
Vercel — deployment, though I've hit its edge function limits more than once.
n8n — orchestrating multi-step agent workflows without writing custom glue code.
The gap I keep hitting that no vibe stack really addresses: when agents go from interactive to autonomous, they need identity infrastructure that none of these tools provide — a real email address for callbacks, somewhere secure to store credentials across runs, 2FA handling. I've been building that as a separate layer underneath everything else.
What are you shipping with your stack — internal tooling or external-facing products?
My biggest issue with juggling multiple AI agents has been the lack of shared memory — constant context loss between tools. Simple agent/memory config files help a bit but don't really solve it.
Ended up building my own local-first memory layer for this (Levh), it's been an interesting problem to work on for the past few months. Curious what others are doing to handle context/memory across their stack.