QA.tech 1.0 - Stop breaking prod, build & test with a fleet of QA agents
by•
Get a fleet of QA agents that protect your product’s quality. Let AI explore your app for full test coverage, monitor staging to catch issues, and deliver debugging context as soon as you open your PRs. Build at full speed and never break prod again.
Replies
Raycast
Love this approach: a swarm of QA agents that explore the product like real users, not brittle scripts.
The big win is how they surface “felt” issues—flows, selectors, auth hiccups, jitter—and then turn that into clear, builder-ready reports with repro steps, context, and impact, bridging the gap between user pain and issue resolution.
If QA.tech's agents adapt as UI/UX evolves, this will greatly improve continuous regression coverage!
QA.tech
@chrismessina this means a lot coming from you <3
Gilion
Robust tech straight from the Swedish Unicorn factory!
QA.tech
@hlandgren <3 thank you!
Humans in the Loop
@hlandgren exactly. please help us spread the word on LinkedIn! se/acc 🇸🇪
Andsend
This is such an uplift! Congrats. What are you most excited about?
Humans in the Loop
Thank you, Per! I personally really enjoy the AI chat experience.
How about you? Have you played around with the product? Would love to have your feedback on the first-time experience
QA.tech
@per_clingweld how our AI chat goes and tests your new features based just on a pull-request: https://docs.qa.tech/configuration/github-app
I used @QA.tech to evaluate our new website which is still in a POC phase. I did not know what to expect but it gave many usable insights. A couple of reprompts made the results even better!
Upvoted. Wishing you the best for your launch!
QA.tech
@ashok_nayak Amazing, happy that we could provide some value!
This is awesome, now all the vibe coders can vibe break their stuff before going to vibe prod!
Jokes apart, really needed tool! Will test it on our own product soon!
QA.tech
@ivan_sem vibe coders can get a user that actualy visits their website!
QA.tech
@ivan_sem Thanks Ivan! Sign up today to get the extra 500 test runs (just for this product hunt launch)
Humans in the Loop
haha spot on! eager to have your feedback on the first-time experience. get started here: qa.tech
QA.tech
I am Solutions Engineer for QAtech usually focused on our biggest customers, but let's make something special for PH community - just share an URL to your web app/service and I will create you a PERSONAL testing suite, or if you want I can give you (and/or your team) a personal training on our AI agents.
I invite you to not be humble and share your URL even if you're a small startup and just need something simple right now such as:
an AI that regularly checks if all your forms can be submitted and work properly, if all the links work
an AI that walks through your user stories on your website to find what broke after the last update
an AI that check that your website works well on mobiles too
Humans in the Loop
@pridiuksson brilliant. could we run a test for producthunt.com? cc @mikekerzhner
QA.tech
@mikekerzhner @fmerian ideally I'd ask you to create an account for our AI in your dev or staging, but testing the prod is always fun!
Let me see what I can do (or dm me your dev/staging URL and account creds)
QA.tech
@mikekerzhner @fmerian dm me please a link to your dev/staging since your prod is very-very much against AI
We are currently rolling out QA.tech in our midsized organization (500 people about 50 engineers). Currently there is a lot of buzz in the office around this tool for a couple different reasons. It makes our product people able to work even closer with the devs making sure we cover more of the user journey. We can catch more edge cases making sure a change in one market don't have an unforceen impact on another. We as devs can spend our time on building and less on QA.
Also QA.tech is just very helpfull and engaged people to work with
QA.tech
@adam_boderus This is so nice to hear! ❤️ Really believe bringing product and devs closer is the future way to build great products!
Wow, major props to the team for shipping this. It’s one thing to promise AI-driven QA. It’s another to deliver a product people might actually rely on...
That said, I’m curious (and a little skeptical): how confident can teams be that the autogenerated tests will catch the weird edge cases, or adapt when UI or flows change mid-sprint? If the AI gets brittle do we end up more debugging the tests than our actual product ??
Anyway, this is the kind of push QA needs... Congratulations again..
QA.tech
@banu_priya3 I think people just need to try it to trust it - same thing as with most LLM-based tools "how can you trust it to not hallucinate"
This is a super clear value prop. QA has always been the part that lagged behind engineering speed, so the ‘fleet of agents’ idea lands well. Curious — how are you approaching pricing for smaller teams that want strong coverage but can’t commit to enterprise budgets yet?
QA.tech
This looks incredibly powerful! How does QA.tech handle testing dynamic content and components that change frequently, like real-time data displays or frequently updated dashboards? Does the AI need retraining or does it adapt automatically?
QA.tech