... nobody covered, which is worse, because it changes a line of code a lot of us shipped this year without thinking about it. If your product has a "paste a URL" box, a link unfurler, an enrichment step, a competitor-monitoring job, or anything that fetches a page and hands it to a model, this is about you. What was actually measured. The paper is "Indirect Prompt Injection in the Wild" by Khodayari, Zhang, Acharya and Pellegrino, out of CISPA ... ... rather than standing alone. And the CISPA paper is an arXiv preprint, v1, not peer reviewed. The measurement is the part I'd trust most, and the 5,200-trial effectiveness study is the part I'd most want replicated

... right and is more useful than either, and the revised version went up this month, so it's worth twenty minutes before you write your Q4 plan. It's NBER working paper 35275, Demirer, Musolff and Yang - "Writing Code vs. Shipping Code." More than 500,000 GitHub developers, matched against their actual AI usage telemetry rather than a survey, in a matched event study design. The headline numbers are large and I have no interest in arguing with them. Cumulative ... ... cost of building the wrong thing dropped and so did the friction that used to stop us. Two caveats. It's a working paper, revised this month, and the marketplace analysis is the part I'd most want replicated

... about the quality of feedback. Maybe the harder part is creating an environment where people feel okay being honest even if they like or respect the builder. Comment from Kabir Salunkhe(@kabirsalunkhe): Feels like it s not brand vs product but what you re actually building trust in. If people follow you for opinions, they ll show up early but they ll also leave fast if the product doesn t hold up. If they discover you through the product, trust ... ... something forgettable enough that you can grow into a real name later. Comment from Mustafa Arian(@thenameisarian): we did both. shipped the v1 with 22 real humans then started building the brand around the thesis. building TAM Network. an alternative

... even a controversial case in China where a scientist was sued after attempting to create gene-edited babies in 2018 . But now we are talking about something different " mental cloning ." Not just genetically creating the body, but potentially replicating the consciousness of an existing entity . In theory, we could exist twice and continue experiencing the future in parallel. With intensive research, I think we might even reach something like this around 2050 . But can you imagine what could go wrong ... ... consciousness, and maybe we should not try to simulate brains of larger animals until then. Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @mahmoud_kamal  One from horror movie series came to my mind... when Homer bought a Hamak and replicated

... Today, I read a TechCrunch article about what investors are no longer looking for in SaaS, or rather, what to avoid if you don't want to lose their interest. The red flags were: Too easy to replicate light AI wrappers, generic horizontal tools, basic CRM clones, generic productivity or project management tools. No real depth products where differentiation is mostly UI and automation, anything without proprietary data, surface-level analytics. Becoming obsolete workflow automation tools that coordinate human work ... ... native team can rebuild your product quickly, investors won't bet on it. So, given all of that, how are you differentiating your SaaS product in the age of AI? Because let's be honest: almost everything can be replicated

... walk through how we approach these questions step by step , using Citable as the working tool among others: 1) Research Identify real prompt demand (not keyword volume) Cluster prompts by intent, persona, and buying stage Establish a clean baseline (replicated runs, frozen personas, citation normalization) 2) Diagnosis Where you re invisible vs

... this is only a bubble. Because of two reasons: He argues that attempts by companies like Tesla and Figure to teach robots dexterity through video-based training are unrealistic, since human touch is vastly more complex than robots can replicate. Safety Large humanoid robots are unstable and potentially dangerous. (Just imagine how we thought that in 2000, we would have flying cars. ) Do you think that Humanoids have potential, or is it just a boom (bubble) that is doomed ... ... believe humanoids for living purposes are quite real. I was listening to a podcast with a programmer who owns a humanoid and trains it. The benefit is that as you teach one humanoid something, this knowledge can be replicated

... expect both could help speed up my development workflow. However, actually switching to them seems to be a huge lift. I've downloaded and explored the two apps, but the thought of figuring out which current habits can be replicatedvs. which ones I should completely relearn with the new app's tools is quite daunting. As a result, I haven't re-opened them... I think the ProductHunt community would lean on the side of more experimental and motivated ...

... world that you will be paid for? (Skill) Will you change your online career to offline? What will it be? Last but not least: Does it make sense to start a business when, with AI, your product can be replicated and you may end up with a copycat solution, or a big giant will surpass you with its resources? Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @ambika_vaish  Sounds familiar to me  my grandparents did gardening. The thing ... ... headlines like these... it s hard not to feel like I showed up late to a party where the rules have already changed. I don t have a flashy answer to what I can offer that AI can t replicate