... lower-end devices a bigger blocker than accuracy right now? Should the next priority be broader sign language support (BSL, ISL, etc.) or going deeper on ASL first? Any specific integrations you'd want (e.g. web SDK, mobile bindings, browser extension) that would make signspell more usable in your projects? Genuinely open to being told I'm focusing on the wrong thing what's the gap you'd want filled next? Comment from Brielle Marie(@brielle_marie): I can imaging ...

... felt uneasy. Where do my files go? Who is hosting them? On top of that, most tools lock basic features behind a paywall or force you to sign up just to place one signature. I wanted a simple, secure alternative. So, I built Sign PDF online . Here is the magic: It is 100% browser-based. Your PDFs never touch our servers. Everything runs locally in your browser using WebAssembly. Your files are completely safe because they never leave your device ... ... Drag, resize, and place signatures anywhere on your document. Create a free digital signature certificate: Type your name using elegant cursive fonts, draw your signature, or upload an image. 100% Serverless & Free: Zero account creation. Zero paywalls. Legally Binding

... namespaced identity borrowed from another system. And anonymous, meaning the answer arrived over a credential that carries no identity at all. A push to a device belonging to one of my users mints the link with a second signed binding to that recipient, domain separated from the answer signature so a one-tap approve link cannot be upgraded into a claim of identity. The device class in your scenario, an end user of a partner who has no account with ... ... gets the URL unchanged, because there is nothing to bind

... realistically and deterministically do so given the massively increased speed of AI code generation? The solution? We have to move from opinion-based review to evidence-based verification. This means building guardrails (what I call the claim checker) that bind the original intent to deterministic evidence: ACs (intents) checks, the builds, the tests, the five-axis code review, the scans, the blast radius of the code change, the docs coverage, requirements are complete and don't contradict each other ... ... trying to solve by building Shipmoor.dev To make the shift from "opinion-based review" to "evidence-based verification," I built Shipmoor with the Claim Check tool. It takes the original prompt/ticket, freezes it into atomic obligations, and binds

... picks dates and sees the rate a couple of steps ahead of the contract. So deliverables and kill fee probably belong there, with the signing screen showing them again as confirmation of something already seen. Same fields, seen twice, binding once. I take the point that signing doesn t mean reading. But I don t think that makes it my job to police attention. Think of it as a menu. If it says the salad has onions and you ordered ... ... specifics, they sign, the day is locked. No editing terms at the signing screen. The bet is that the negotiation already happened over email or a call, and what s missing is the part where sounds good becomes something binding

... external server, giving you complete privacy and peace of mind. Features: Draw, type, or upload your signature Sign any PDF or image 100% free, forever no credit card No watermarks on downloads Works on iPhone, Android, and desktop Legally binding under ESIGN Act & eIDAS Free PDF tools: merge, compress, rotate, protect Website: https://mydigitsign.com Topics: PDF, Productivity, Privacy, E-Signature, Free Tools ...

... agent renders a chart from a data pull, and i ask a follow-up like "now show only Q4", does it re-run the whole generation step and re-render a new iframe, or is there some live binding back to the underlying data so it can patch the existing one? asking because if it's regenerate-from-scratch every time, that's a lot of tokens spent for what should be a filter operation ...

... month. An upvote is one click and you never leave the page. Installing means going to the App Store, downloading, sitting through onboarding. Way more friction, so the numbers were never going to match. I'm not sure B2B vs B2C is the real split though. Feels more like whether the people on PH actually have the problem you're solving. Devs obviously have dev tool problems so B2B lands by default. Mine is screen time and devs ... ... limited testers. They gave us the first feedbacks for us to make the app better. After we didn't succeeded with a try on LinkedIn, where the feedback was nearly zero, we are on our way to find good alternatives

... real answer to this in the C2PA spec itself I checked. It's literally called a "Durable Content Credential," and the mechanism you're describing (checkable without pinging a private server) is exactly what C2PA's own "Soft Binding Resolution API" is designed for a standardized way to look up a manifest via fingerprint/watermark that isn't just "trust our API." So the honest answer: that's the correct direction, and we didn't invent it it's the actual ... ... fixed date I'm willing to commit to publicly yet I'd rather tell you honestly this is real, active thinking than promise a quarter and risk not delivering. Comment from Abdullah Javaid(@abdullah_javaid3): @abhineetarora  Soft Binding

... unlabeled bad memory at least competes. A canonical one wins. So the question about your own model: can anything move a memory out of canonical without me deciding to? An expiry, a re-confirm after six months, or binding it to the thing it describes so it dies when that changes? Genuinely asking, I do not have a good answer on my side either. Every version I can think of either nags you constantly or trusts a stale fact forever ...

... breaks. Negative feedback is the most useful kind. Comment from Giulianno Vollmer(@giulianno_v): The per-agent profile and action gate are the right split. The tissue anecdote is also a perfect reminder that asks before purchase needs to bind approval to the exact cart, quantities, shipping address, total, and final action, not merely the intent to buy. Does the approval invalidate if the page changes after review? Comment from tpae(@tpae): @rehan_aslam6  I had it order stuff ...

... Bottleneck: AI has no hands AI agents are brilliant at writing code, but they are "physically disabled" on your local machine. When an agent writes a full-stack app, it stops and tells you: "Please install PostgreSQL, configure Nginx, bind a domain, and set up SSL." Suddenly, the developer becomes the manual "laborer" for the AI. We realized that AI agents need a local runtime foundation to actually deploy, run, and test code autonomously. To solve this, we built ... ... built-in MCP Server that gives agents the "hands" they need. Now, a simple prompt like "build me a blog with MySQL and HTTPS" lets the agent call ServBay's tools directly to set up the DB, bind

... imports volumes back, loads or rebuilds images, restores project files Docker-only folders count - docker-compose.yml without a git repo is now detected as an archivable project Caveats I'll be upfront about: Docker daemon should be running during archive/restore; bind mounts outside the project tree aren't captured as volumes; running containers aren't stopped for you. One-click polyglot restore Light archives strip all regenerable deps (node_modules, .venv, target, .gradle, etc.) but keep lockfiles. On restore, DevCleaner detects ...

... quality issues can come from many places: the source, the engine, the glossary, the reviewer, or a human edit. Knowing who changed what and when makes the system much easier to trust. Comment from Scarlett Massey(@scarlett_massey): @pappu_bind  Great addition. For me, audit logs aren't just about security they're also about learning from past actions and improving process Comment from Ghost Kitty(@ghost-kitty-9899795): Comment Deleted ...

... developers are shipping AI-generated projects with credentials sitting in plain sight. Hopefully this helps prevent a few future disasters. How are you currently managing API keys and secrets across projects? Comment from Arda Can K rko (@ardacankrko): @pappu_bind  That s been my experience too. AI has dramatically reduced the time it takes me to start a project. The number of API keys, certificates, and credentials I have to keep track of has grown just as fast. Comment from ... ... Ghost Kitty(@ghost-kitty-9899795): Comment Deleted Comment from Scarlett Massey(@scarlett_massey): @pappu_bind

... galdayan): our setup ended up being a Slack webhook per agent session, posted to a channel only that agent writes to. sounds basic but the key part was making the notification say WHY it's waiting (needs approval vs finished vs

... planning to expose things like: open ports per host, port state, devices online / by kind, alert counts by type, and Mac throughput (up/down). It'll be off by default, with a configurable port, and the option to bind it to the LAN (so a Prometheus running on another host can scrape it) Two quick questions to prioritize: 1. Does your Prometheus run on the same Mac, or on another machine on your network? 2. Which metrics matter most ...

... token service stub has been tested using fake sample data only. The token storage approval gate is working as a non-persistent review flow. The OAuth exchange dry-run receipt room is installed. The OAuth exchange approval and state-binding stub is installed. The OAuth state nonce generator preview is installed. The OAuth state vault design room is installed. The latest migration approval gate is now installed for the future Shopify OAuth state vault. Where we are now: Blaze ... ... preview the future Shopify OAuth state lifecycle without storing anything yet. That includes: issuing a future state receipt binding

... token service stub has been tested using fake sample data only. The token storage approval gate is working as a non-persistent review flow. The OAuth exchange dry-run receipt room is installed. The OAuth exchange approval and state-binding stub is installed. The OAuth state nonce generator preview is installed. The OAuth state vault design room is installed. The latest migration approval gate is now installed for the future Shopify OAuth state vault. Where we are now: Blaze ... ... preview the future Shopify OAuth state lifecycle without storing anything yet. That includes: issuing a future state receipt binding

... think it should stay open  - what governance rules would you want locked in from day one? What would make you still trust the TLD in 5 years? If this resonates, the non-binding endorsement is here (30 seconds). The one-pager has the deeper version. Either way, would love to hear what you think. Especially the pushback. Comment from Balazs(@nembal): @umairnadeem  honest answer. not yet, because there aren't tru agent to agent communication happening ...

... zero-knowledge, which means you hold the key. The customers who choose us choose us partly because of that constraint, not despite it. The worry never fully goes away, but I try to reframe it because what's the alternative? Being able to recover data because we hold the keys that seems worse in terms of failure for the people who actually need privacy. In your case, I would think failure is even higher-risk than a service like Metamorphic ... ... required. Version-tagged ciphertext We introduced a v1/v2 format so legacy-encrypted data continues to workseamlessly while all keys are progressively upgraded to quantum-resistant wrapping SHA3-256 key combiner The two shared secrets are combined with full transcript binding

... something at least! I saw a couple of interesting tools during the last few weeks, but I didn't even try them because I see stuff like this on their legal pages: "These Terms & Conditions form a binding agreement between you and NAMEOFTHETOOL." "Welcome to NAMEOFTHETOOL ( we, our, or us )." "NAMEOFTHETOOL ("we", "our", or "us") operates the website at http-NAMEOFTHETOOL-com." These don't mean anything! It's circular at best... "We are us, and "us" is this ...

... just launched Signbee an e-signature API that lets developers (and AI agents) send legally-binding documents for signature with a single API call. Why I built it: I was building an autonomous sales pipeline the agent could find prospects, send outreach, and book meetings. But when it came to closing with a signed contract? Every e-signature tool needed a human clicking through a GUI. So I built one that doesn't. How it works: POST /api/v1/send { "signerEmail": " jane@acme.com ... ... webhook when it's done. No SDK, no OAuth maze, no 200-page docs. What makes it different: Agent-first Built for API consumers, not GUI users One call No session tokens, no multi-step flows Legally binding

... request, not a 47-step OAuth dance with a legacy enterprise SDK. What I built: One API call. Document signed. That's it. Signbee gives developers (and their agents) a clean REST API to create, send, and track legally-binding e-signatures. The bigger picture: We're watching the agentic infrastructure stack form in real time: Cal.com scheduling AgentMail email Signbee e-signatures Stripe MPP payments An AI agent can now research a prospect, send outreach, book a meeting, sign ...

... product and what they truly value. Investors usually want to see traction with users, not just paying customers yet, so founders might intentionally delay strict paywalls to gather data and feedback. Later, the question becomes more about cost vs. user value. If a feature is core to understanding the product, putting it behind a paywall too early can backfire people might never experience the aha moment. In those cases, it often makes sense to make it free for a limited ... ... paid tier. Out of curiosity do you usually prefer a free tier, or a short trial that unlocks the full product? Comment from Takahito Yoneda(@y_taka): Your general versus