Andrew Stewart

The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.

The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.

There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.

The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.

In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.

Extremely. And, the agent "thought process" is very discoverable.

It seemed to grok our moderate Rails monorepo pretty smoothly.

There's a planning mode (default) that I think did a standard job at. I didn't notice any guardrails

It felt very fast until I ran out of credits and decided to just stop working.

It's often much more relaxing to just say what I want to type instead of having to type it. And, it doesn't get in the way when I'm not using it.

The product's basic functionality works so well that I didn't even explore any other features that they have, like snippets.

I found Wispr Flow first. Old habits die hard.

I haven't tried this feature.

easily

I haven't noticed any issues. But it might be that I don't dictate enough for it to be a problem.