Reviewers describe Google Antigravity as a strong productivity tool that is easy to use, fast, and especially good at explaining code, planning implementations, and helping people explore ideas or handle complex tasks. Users also say it works well for mockups, infrastructure and API work, and broader workflows, though some prefer single-task use over its agent manager. The main complaints are minor UI bugs, rough polish, weaker handling of larger multi-file projects, and occasional limits or model fallback. Founders from Socra and Dropy also praise its parallel agents for feature design and backend work.
For a very long time I had all these ideas that I couldn't act on. Antigravity has allowed me to just explore and create again, which is a wonderful feeling. The recent addition of skills has exploded my workflow productivity, it literally handles my inbox and calendar for me now. I've been a Google fanboy for a long time and I love what they're doing here.
What needs improvement
Still has some minor UI quirks and small bugs as expected with a new tool, but nothing that stops the workflow. I’m excited to see more built-in skills added.
vs Alternatives
I’ve used Cursor and Claude Code extensively, but they always felt like advanced autocomplete. I chose Antigravity because it bridges the gap between "writing code" and "getting things done." The autonomous skills, handling my real-world emails, calendar, and project setup, along with the deep planning it applies to project architecture, make it the only tool that actually feels like a teammate instead of just a text editor.
The agent workflow seemed like a meaningful improvement over Cursor. It was easy to follow the agent's code exploration and "though process". The review workflow made it feel very natural to iterate on the agent's proposed solution.
What needs improvement
The onboarding/trial felt weak somehow. I ran out of free-usage fairly quickly, and it fell over onto weaker models. I wasn't prompted to upgrade. For a new product, I'd expect to be able to trial it fully-featured, and then decide whether to upgrade.
There were some UI bugs, but nothing I couldn't live with for a new product.
The most important thing is going to be model accuracy. It's worth giving up on UX for better code generation.
In that sense, I actually stalled. Antigravity had momentum, but then stalled and failed over to weaker models. I had to get back to work, so I switched back to Cursor + Claude Code.
It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.
I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it
What needs improvement
Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help
vs Alternatives
I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.
Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear
I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).
Ratings
Ease of use
Reliability
Value for money
Customization
Report
12 views
Framer — Launch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.
Launch websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds.
Promoted
Been using it for a few days and I love it. Very generous with AI limits and context windows too. The kicker is that Claude is better than Gemini in this platform but that’s another story!
Wondering why they rushed this out without finishing pricing, better product images... really looks rushed as hell
Report
Wow. This is really cool. I love playing around with it and I quickly ran out of tokens. So much fun!
Report
At launch Anti-Gravity still feels a bit clunky and buggy for what it is, I see the potential in it with a few tweaks just to make it feel more smooth however and good enough for first day launch
Safe to say: Antigravity is taking the lead among AI IDEs right now. Very well done to unexpectedly impress the whole world!
But surely, I wait for response from Cursor and Antropic. his competition is going to make our lives so much better :)
Report
Incredible so far. I felt tempted to throw feature request after feature request at it to see when it lost the plot. It did, but later than Claude code has in the past. Gemini 3 rocks!
Report
Its amazing, the only problem is the rate limit, too less tokens, but still its a game changer in the long run as currently many people are trying it out so they gotta keep strict rate limits.
RiteKit Company Logo API
Wondering why they rushed this out without finishing pricing, better product images... really looks rushed as hell
At launch Anti-Gravity still feels a bit clunky and buggy for what it is, I see the potential in it with a few tweaks just to make it feel more smooth however and good enough for first day launch
MultiDrive
Safe to say: Antigravity is taking the lead among AI IDEs right now. Very well done to unexpectedly impress the whole world!
But surely, I wait for response from Cursor and Antropic. his competition is going to make our lives so much better :)
Its amazing, the only problem is the rate limit, too less tokens, but still its a game changer in the long run as currently many people are trying it out so they gotta keep strict rate limits.