SYNAPSE coordinates the work. You define the quality bar.

There is an important boundary I want to make explicit.

How I actually recommend installing SYNAPSE

If you are the kind of user SYNAPSE is primarily designed for, you probably already have several capable coding agents open in multiple terminals.

We also maintain tested operating patterns and best-practice configurations that we have developed through our own use of these systems.

Those extended workflow profiles are part of the premium offering rather than the public Core.

From coordinated work to evidence-bound engineering

Coordination tells us who worked on what.

Verification can tell us whether an output is sufficiently grounded.

Why Astra matters in this launch

Because this launch is part of the GPT-6 Astra Challenge, it is worth explaining exactly what role Astra played in SYNAPSE.

Coordination is not enough: verification and action governance

SYNAPSE answers an important class of questions:

Bring the agents and tools you already use

A coordination layer becomes much less useful if adopting it requires replacing the agents, models and development tools a team already depends on.

From local coordination to a distributed fleet

The previous thread expanded SYNAPSE from one repository to multiple projects and repositories.

From one repository to multiple projects

A single repository is the easiest place to understand SYNAPSE, but it is not the boundary of the coordination model.

Real engineering systems are often larger than one codebase.

How does SYNAPSE coordination actually work?

The previous threads described why a coordination layer is useful and where SYNAPSE fits in the agent stack.

This is the practical part: what happens when agents actually start working together?