Write agent logic, and skip the plumbing. Give AI agents reliable access to 2,000+ APIs with retries, idempotency, policy enforcement, and durable state.
Over the last year, we kept seeing the same pattern. Building AI agents was easy. Getting them to reliably execute actions in production was not.
Agents would call APIs with invalid payloads, fail because of auth issues, retry actions that shouldn't be retried, or break when an API changed. Debugging these failures quickly became a bigger problem than building the agent itself.
The agent wasn't the problem. The execution layer had zero protection.
That's why we built Swytchcode CLI.
Swytchcode sits between your AI agent and every API it calls.
Schema validation before every request. Field renames and breaking API changes don't silently break your agent.
Authentication handled. OAuth, API keys, and enterprise SSO without exposing credentials to the agent.
Idempotency guarantees so duplicate executions don't create duplicate outcomes.
Policy enforcement to keep agents operating within defined guardrails.
2000+ APIs out of the box, including Stripe, GitHub, Slack, Resend, HubSpot, Notion, Jira, Twilio, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Binance and many more.
Works with Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Openclaw, Gemini, windsurf , Hermes agents. No rewrites. No new infrastructure.
We believe the next wave of AI products will be defined not by how well agents think, but by how reliably they execute in production.
Try it now:
npx swytchcode
We'd love feedback from AI engineers, agent builders, and anyone experimenting with agentic workflows.
@chaitrali_kakde1 Congrats on the launch guys. may be add direct integration with popular secret vaults eg Doppler or AWS Secrets Manager for enterprise ICPs down the road?
@mohsinproduct This is a great suggestion, Moshin. We are already working on it. Also, would love to catchup and take some feedback, if you are ok. Sending you a LinkedIn connection.
Report
Hi Chaitrali, curious to know how you guys standardize idempotency handling when each external API has wildly different native mechanisms. great to see CLI launch
Idempotency is built into the Swytchcode CLI. We use a manifest file to standardize idempotency, retries, and environment configuration across APIs. We're also adding custom workflow rules soon for even finer control. 🚀
@crystalmei Thanks for your interest. Idempotency is inbuilt with Swytchcode CLI. We have a manifest file to manage idempotency, retries, and environment. Also, really soon we are coming up with custom rules for each workflow
Report
Heyy, I love the Product direction here , breaking api changes silently killing priduction agents is in noght mare scenario beouse the llm just try to hallucinate a workaround if it gets a 400 error. Schema validation at the gate is the right way to handle this, congrats for CLI launch 👏
@ruvik_milkis Thanks a lot! Really appreciate it. If you get a chance to explore Swytchcode, I'd love to hear your feedback. It would mean a lot to us! 🚀
The npx swytchcode approach is super clean. Being able to just spin it up and test it without a massive architectural rewrite is a huge selling point, stoked to see support for Windsurf and Cursor out of the box. Amazing launch 👏
@istiakahmad Thanks for the encouraging words. Do try it out. We also support Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, and many others. I would really love your feedback
Report
Solid niche to own! Curious about the long tail: for the APIs in your 2000 with no native idempotency key, are you synthesizing one off a payload hash and deduping on your side? Overall, congrats on the launch!
@artstavenka1 thanks a lot. We have a manifest file where you can define custom idempotency for your API calls along with retries and environment handling. Please feel free to try out our product. Happy to hear your feedback.
Report
Giving AI agents reliable access to APIs feels like a bigger challenge than generating the code itself. Have you seen teams use Swytchcode primarily with autonomous agents or with human developers in the loop?
@harini_mukesh This is a great question. Swytchcode is meant to be used with both human developers and agents alike. When connecting with agents, our MCP commands and rules come into play. Whereas a developer can use the CLI commands normally to do any integration.
Report
@chilarai That makes a lot of sense. I like that you're supporting both workflows rather than forcing users into an agent-only experience. It feels like most teams are still in that transition phase where humans and AI agents need to work together. Thanks for sharing!
This is exactly the execution layer that's been missing from most agentic stacks. The fact that agents can now get schema validation, idempotency, and policy enforcement out of the box — without rewriting any logic — is a huge deal for anyone shipping AI products to production. The 2,000+ API coverage is impressive too. Congrats on the launch! 🚀
Quick question: how does Swytchcode handle rollback or compensation when a multi-step agent workflow partially fails mid-chain — for example, if step 3 of 5 hits a policy violation after steps 1 and 2 already executed?
Replies
Swytchcode
Hey Product Hunt, Swytchcode CLI is live today! 🚀
Over the last year, we kept seeing the same pattern. Building AI agents was easy. Getting them to reliably execute actions in production was not.
Agents would call APIs with invalid payloads, fail because of auth issues, retry actions that shouldn't be retried, or break when an API changed. Debugging these failures quickly became a bigger problem than building the agent itself.
The agent wasn't the problem. The execution layer had zero protection.
That's why we built Swytchcode CLI.
Swytchcode sits between your AI agent and every API it calls.
Schema validation before every request. Field renames and breaking API changes don't silently break your agent.
Authentication handled. OAuth, API keys, and enterprise SSO without exposing credentials to the agent.
Idempotency guarantees so duplicate executions don't create duplicate outcomes.
Policy enforcement to keep agents operating within defined guardrails.
2000+ APIs out of the box, including Stripe, GitHub, Slack, Resend, HubSpot, Notion, Jira, Twilio, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Binance and many more.
Works with Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Openclaw, Gemini, windsurf , Hermes agents. No rewrites. No new infrastructure.
We believe the next wave of AI products will be defined not by how well agents think, but by how reliably they execute in production.
Try it now:
We'd love feedback from AI engineers, agent builders, and anyone experimenting with agentic workflows.
Join our Discord community : https://discord.com/invite/zuSXSv5GWs
Explore the docs and get started : https://docs.swytchcode.com
Explore usecase examples: https://github.com/swytchcodehq
PicWish
@chaitrali_kakde1 Congrats on the launch guys. may be add direct integration with popular secret vaults eg Doppler or AWS Secrets Manager for enterprise ICPs down the road?
Swytchcode
@mohsinproduct This is a great suggestion, Moshin. We are already working on it.
Also, would love to catchup and take some feedback, if you are ok. Sending you a LinkedIn connection.
Hi Chaitrali, curious to know how you guys standardize idempotency handling when each external API has wildly different native mechanisms. great to see CLI launch
Swytchcode
@vikramp7470 Great question, Vikram!
Idempotency is built into the Swytchcode CLI. We use a manifest file to standardize idempotency, retries, and environment configuration across APIs. We're also adding custom workflow rules soon for even finer control. 🚀
Congrats! Curious how does Swytchcode standardize idempotency handling when each API has wildly different native mechanisms or none at all?
Swytchcode
@crystalmei Thanks for your interest. Idempotency is inbuilt with Swytchcode CLI. We have a manifest file to manage idempotency, retries, and environment. Also, really soon we are coming up with custom rules for each workflow
Heyy, I love the Product direction here , breaking api changes silently killing priduction agents is in noght mare scenario beouse the llm just try to hallucinate a workaround if it gets a 400 error. Schema validation at the gate is the right way to handle this, congrats for CLI launch 👏
Swytchcode
@priya_kushwaha1 Thanks a lot, Priya. Please do try the CLI and give us feedback.
Swytchcode
@ruvik_milkis Thanks a lot! Really appreciate it. If you get a chance to explore Swytchcode, I'd love to hear your feedback. It would mean a lot to us! 🚀
Lancepilot
Swytchcode
@istiakahmad Thanks for the encouraging words. Do try it out.
We also support Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, and many others. I would really love your feedback
Solid niche to own! Curious about the long tail: for the APIs in your 2000 with no native idempotency key, are you synthesizing one off a payload hash and deduping on your side? Overall, congrats on the launch!
Swytchcode
@artstavenka1 thanks a lot. We have a manifest file where you can define custom idempotency for your API calls along with retries and environment handling. Please feel free to try out our product. Happy to hear your feedback.
Swytchcode
@harini_mukesh This is a great question. Swytchcode is meant to be used with both human developers and agents alike. When connecting with agents, our MCP commands and rules come into play. Whereas a developer can use the CLI commands normally to do any integration.
@chilarai That makes a lot of sense. I like that you're supporting both workflows rather than forcing users into an agent-only experience. It feels like most teams are still in that transition phase where humans and AI agents need to work together. Thanks for sharing!
interesting product!
Swytchcode
@madalina_barbu thanks Madalina
This is exactly the execution layer that's been missing from most agentic stacks. The fact that agents can now get schema validation, idempotency, and policy enforcement out of the box — without rewriting any logic — is a huge deal for anyone shipping AI products to production. The 2,000+ API coverage is impressive too. Congrats on the launch! 🚀
Quick question: how does Swytchcode handle rollback or compensation when a multi-step agent workflow partially fails mid-chain — for example, if step 3 of 5 hits a policy violation after steps 1 and 2 already executed?
Swytchcode
@doganakbulut this is a brilliant idea. Today we don't have rollback feature. Will see how we will implement this.
Would love to connect and discuss. Will ping you on Linkedin