QA.tech 1.0 - Stop breaking prod, build & test with a fleet of QA agents
by•
Get a fleet of QA agents that protect your product’s quality. Let AI explore your app for full test coverage, monitor staging to catch issues, and deliver debugging context as soon as you open your PRs. Build at full speed and never break prod again.
Replies
QA.tech
I’ve spent two decades in engineering leadership, and one thing always stood out: every part of building software has become easier, faster, and more modern.
Except QA. Testing has been standing still.
And while the whole world has accepted “move fast and break things” as the status quo, I want to move fast and not break things.
That’s why we built QA.tech. We want developers to move fast, get feedback quickly, and ship with confidence, without QA being a bottleneck.
AI-assisted development tools are accelerating the pace of shipping for developer teams. On top of that, new builders emerge in this era of vibe coding. They will create numerous applications, all of which will require rigorous testing. I believe that product quality will be the key differentiator in a competitive market.
I believe the best builders are hands-on in every part of the product. That’s also why Product Hunt feels like the right place to launch. We want feedback directly from people who live and breathe building.
To make sure you get to play with QA.tech enough, we’re giving 2x test credits on the week of PH launch.
Excited to hear what you think!
Check the link below for full overview of the 1.0 changes and the backstory of WHY and HOW we built QA.tech
https://www.qa.tech/blog/qa-tech-1-0--a-new-way-of-ai-testing-for-developers
ScaryStories Live
@daniel_mauno_pettersson Congrats, Patrick! this resonates. After two decades, I feel that QA gap too. How will QA.tech’s agents keep tests stable as UIs evolve—auth flows, flaky selectors, network jitter—and can teams enforce org‑wide guardrails so auto‑generated tests never bypass RBAC or prod data isolation?
QA.tech
@tonyabracadabra We use agent for every step so it always considers new changes to arrive at the goal. So it doesn't just keep flaky when selectors change but also if you change how to fulfill the goal (for example moving place on two steps in an onboarding).
This is also powerful with different network issues as the agent will see loaders and continue to wait when those are missing - however if you miss a loader the agent will get confused just as users and might fail the test.
We recommend always running towards a staging environment or an isolated account to make sure RBAC and prod data is not shared with the agent. For now we don't have a focus on security testing (simple role testing is possible) but it's for sure something we wish to add in the future.
Thanks for checking us out!
@daniel_mauno_pettersson Congrats on the launch! 🚀
Quick question: How does QA.tech handle edge cases that are hard to anticipate? Curious how the AI learns what to test beyond the obvious flows.
Upvoted and excited to try this!
UXPin Merge
Totally see how this could make life easier for smaller teams. Love the idea!
QA.tech
Thanks, @natlas ! You have great perspective as someone who moved from QA role to Product Manager. Thank you for your support! 🖤
@natlas Thank you, Nat! Please help us spread the word on LinkedIn
I tried QA.tech a few weeks ago for the first time. It's great to see the project featured on Product Hunt now!
At Luden.io, we develop video games (including web platforms) and have been searching for LLM-based QA solutions since GPT-3.5. As a studio of only 15 developers, we're always looking to automate as much as possible. Surprisingly, QA.tech is the first tool that has figured out how to test our video games by using WASD movement and performing in-game actions.
Highly recommended—give it a try!
QA.tech
@oleg_chumakov was happy to support your onboarding and thanks for the feedback
@pridiuksson always happy to try new things from your amazing team, keep going!
amazing, Oleg! please help us spread the word on LinkedIn
@fmerian Reposted with pleasure https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7381790621688094720/
QA.tech
@jaredbutler Thanks for checking us out
1) Yes, for the product hunt launch you can run 1000 free tests. Pricing then starts from $499 per month with 1000 test runs included.
2) We recommend testing against staging environments but if you wish to test against live we block all common tracking tags. If you have backend tracking you can check for the headers of our agent and disable tracking.
QA.tech
Fun fact: We almost called it 2.0, but honestly this is the version we meant to build from day one. Now almost 2 years since we started building (and fighting finicky early LLMs) it's ready. And it's super powerful!
We’ve been using it internally for weeks and it has already found many bugs and UX issues we would have missed. All without no extra work from us.
Disclaimer: Not for slow teams!
@patricklef dogfooding ftw
nibi
Well done guys! This tool looks very promising, especially when we know how time consuming and complex are the tests cases scenarios of our products. I will definitely give it a try. Are you also planning to make it available for mobile Apps at some point?
QA.tech
@yavin yes, in the backglog
QA.tech
@yavin Thanks! ❤️ We do have plans for this actually but you cant test apps today in the platform unless you have a web interface. Stay tuned for the next release! 😄
@yavin @while spoiler alert: upcoming launch on @Product Hunt? cc @whtmnk
Conferize
Wow! Congrats to the entire team! It's impressive to see these results (320h saved, 390hours saved, customer after customer), lots of vaporware solutions out there in this space but reading through all these customer cases and testimonials you can see that a lot of thought and work went into this.
ps: Is there something in the water in Stockholm? what is going on?? :))
@gidea thanks for your kind words, Vlad. please help us spread the word on LinkedIn!
QA.tech
@gidea hey, I didn't find your account in our system, but if you sign up (and get all these tokens today) - I promise to jump on a call with you to help you set up regression testing suite for Conferize
had a blast working on this launch. there are rare talents on this team with high-quality standards and attention to detail.
the result? a polished product with a stellar developer experience.
oh and @whtmnk and I will be live on X later today at 4 PM CET / 10 AM EST to discuss the behind-the-scenes of this launch. tune in!
Gave this a whirl and first impression is sweet, very smooth onboarding and chat guided test setup.
As a solo builder this sort of tool could be a game changer for testing 🙌
QA.tech
@davidculemann as our AI chat what it thinks are the most important things to get tested on your website regularly - could get interesting ideas
@davidculemann strong +1. absolute fan of the first-time experience.
UI Bakery
Curious, can you use it for scraping-like tasks?
QA.tech
@vladimir_lugovsky Probably better tools out there for scraping.. But I guess technically you could!
QA.tech
@vladimir_lugovsky it builds a knowledge graph and it uses it internally to interact with your website: https://docs.qa.tech/core-concepts/knowledge-graph
QA.tech
@vladimir_lugovsky in theory you can - but it is not very cost-efficient due to all the complex processing we do to make it reliable and smart enough to do the QA tasks
UI Bakery
@daniel_mauno_pettersson understood, thank you for getting back!