Code review competes for the same attention as everything else
by•
Meetings.
Incidents.
Messages.
Context switching.
When reviews arrive noisy,
they get rushed.
When they arrive clean,
they get care.
PRFlow is our attempt to improve the starting point of review,
not replace the human part.
If you’re curious, here’s the link : https://www.graphbit.ai/prflow
43 views
Replies
I feel this deeply. Reviews often land when my attention is already fragmented. When a PR is clean, my brain slows down and I can actually think. Improving that starting poiint makes a real difference, not replacing judgment, just respecting it.
GraphBit
@laiba_asghar That’s exactly the point. Clean input creates the space for real thinking. Respecting human judgment starts with respecting attention.
This mirrors my daily experience. Meetings, alerts and messages pull me everywhere. When reviews are noisy, I rush. When they're clear, I engage. I like the idea of improving how reviews begin instead of automating the human thinking.
GraphBit
@karen_stephanie Well put. Speed without clarity just pushes people to rush. Improving how reviews begin preserves the human part instead of trying to automate it away.
I relate to this a lot. My best reviews happen when the PR doesn't fight for attention. A clean entry point sets the tone. Supporting reviewers instead of replacing them feels like the right direction to me.
GraphBit
@delphia_phy I agree. A calm entry point changes the entire review dynamic. When the PR doesn’t compete for attention, reviewers can actually engage with intent and design.
Making reviews calmer instead of faster is an underrated goal.
GraphBit
@navin_kumar_singh Exactly. Calmness is a quality metric we rarely talk about, but it’s often what determines whether good judgment shows up at all.