1. First, it's essential to thoroughly analyze user feedback and uncover the underlying needs. Oftentimes, users are not pointing out a specific problem but expressing dissatisfaction with a particular scenario, which might already be part of your long-term roadmap. 2. If there is indeed a significant conflict between user feedback and the product vision, I suggest being transparent rather than hiding the truth. It's even better to communicate openly with users-perhaps even recommending a product that might better suit their needs. In conclusion, I believe that the long-term value of a product will always shine through, and maintaining a good relationship with users is undoubtedly a critical factor.
I recently read Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, and it offered a profound perspective on life. It reminded me that, regardless of our circumstances whether rich or poor, successful or struggling we must stay grounded and practice gratitude daily. Life is fleeting, and the most meaningful way to honor it is by living with purpose, focusing on what we can control, and appreciating the present moment.
Lately, I ve been thinking about how different it feels to build and connect on smaller community platforms compared to the massive social networks. Smaller spaces often feel more personal, supportive, and genuine, but of course, they come with a smaller reach.
So I m curious: Do you prefer the vibe of smaller, niche platforms, or do you still focus on growing on the big ones? What makes a smaller community worth your time? Would you switch to a newer platform if it offered more meaningful engagement, even with fewer users?
We re building an AI memory layer that acts like a second brain, something that helps you recall the right file, note, or detail when you need it, without digging.
But here s the big question:
Do you want your AI to remember your insurance policy? That link from 2021? A contract you forgot about?
Where would you personally draw the line between helpful memory and too much ?
