Andras Czeizel

Thoughts on the European Union from the perspective of a young founder

by

As a European citizen, I think we need to look at the current situation clearly.

I’m from Hungary, a country where the previous administration became well known for strongly criticizing the EU. But this post is not about that political debate.

I want to talk about the part I do live every day: technology, startups, and building something from Europe.

Let’s take AI as the most obvious example.

AI is probably the new industrial revolution happening in front of us. The world met ChatGPT, and suddenly everyone understood that this was not just another tech trend. This was a shift.

And Europe’s first instinct felt like: regulate it.

Don’t get me wrong. Regulation matters. Safety matters. Privacy matters. Trust matters. These are European strengths, and we should not throw them away.

But sometimes it feels like Europe tries to administrate the future before it has built enough of it.

That is the problem.

While the US and China are producing many of the companies, models, infrastructure, and platforms that shape the market, Europe is often trying to catch up through rules, committees, and frameworks.

Yes, we have promising companies. Mistral is a real European AI company. There are great founders here. There is talent here. There is capital here.

But the uncomfortable truth is this: Europe is not short on smart people.

Europe is short on startup speed, risk appetite, founder-friendly structures, and the belief that young companies should be treated as partners, not as problems to be managed.

The same pattern appears in consumer tech too.

How many truly global European social media platforms do we use every day?

BeReal was one of the few recent examples worth mentioning. And I genuinely wish good luck to teams like Monnett trying to build in this space.

But most of the platforms we use are American. Most of the tools we build with are American. Most of the AI products we talk about are American. In many SaaS categories, the market leaders are not European either.

Even in the space where I’m building, link-in-bio industry, the biggest player is Linktree from Australia.

This is not an anti-America post.

Actually, it is the opposite.

I love what America has managed to build around startups, ambition, venture capital, universities, networks, and the idea that a young founder with an unreasonable plan might actually be worth backing.

I haven’t had the chance to visit the US yet, but it is definitely one of my goals.

Europe should not copy everything blindly.

But we should be honest enough to learn from what works.

We need more than grants.

We need density.

We need a European Silicon Valley mindset.

We need something with the energy, speed, and network effects of Y Combinator.

We need easier cross-border company building.

We need investor-friendly structures.

We need less fragmentation.

We need leaders who understand that startups are not a side topic of the economy. They are one of the ways the future gets built.

EU Inc. sounds like a step in the right direction. A unified, founder-friendly company structure could genuinely help. But as always in Europe, the question is not only what we announce.

The question is how fast we actually execute.

I don’t believe in a United States of Europe.

But I do believe Europe needs to cooperate much better when it comes to startups, innovation, AI, and technological independence.

Because right now, if a European founder wants to build something truly global, it often feels like the default path is to look outside Europe first.

For capital.

For company structure.

For customers.

For inspiration.

For validation.

That should bother us.

Not because we should hate the US.

But because Europe should not be dependent on others for every major technological layer of the future.

Our leaders need to put ego aside, admit where we are behind, and act with urgency.

The talent is here.

The ambition is here.

The question is whether the system around us is willing to move fast enough.

I’m still optimistic.

But optimism without execution is just a nice speech.

Europe does not need another decade of talking about innovation.

It needs to become one of the best places in the world to actually build.

I’d genuinely love to hear how others see this.

If you live in the EU, does it feel the same from where you are? And if you’re outside Europe, how does the European startup ecosystem look from the outside?

30 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Pranay
I live in gothenburg , sweden an industrial city with volvo , Eriksson , skf and so on but i don’t see any shift or any real tech company here thinking of AI . Maybe i am wrong but it seems like Europe has dropped the ball on this one !
Andras Czeizel
@pranay19 I think you’re right to be worried. Europe has incredible industrial companies and engineering talent, but in AI it often feels like we are moving too slowly and treating it as an “add-on” instead of a strategic shift. The talent is here, but the urgency is not always visible. If Europe wants to stay competitive, AI cannot just be something companies experiment with on the side. It has to become central to how we build, operate, and compete globally.
Pranay
@andrasczeizel I agree I only see CEO’s asking but not guiding how to use it ? No investment from big firms to research and understand how they can include it in there chain ! I can already see if integrated correctly AI can easily create 30 percent efficiency ! But alas no takers here , there are some exceptions like lovable though !
Nika

I think that many European countries, in terms of citizens, lack the entrepreneurial spirit. We used to be led by authorities and mostly under the soviets regime; we were used to sticking to some "5-year plans."

People perceived it as stability. = Comfort.

A social system guaranteed by the government is also some kind of "stability" or "comfort" – it isn't, but people perceive it like that.

And what is entrepreneurship and AI? Risks, instability, etc.

Replacing/reducing labour jobs with AI means people lose their jobs, and new job vacancies will not be created at such a fast pace... what does it mean? Who will take care of jobless families?

The social systems of countries are not prepared for that, and the only way they want to make it sustainable is through regulation.

In the short term, we are slowing down the disaster for EU people; in the long term, we are losing the game with other continents and big players, and we are falling behind.

Andras Czeizel
@busmark_w_nika I agree with a lot of this. Many European societies are culturally more attached to stability and predictability, and AI/entrepreneurship naturally brings risk, uncertainty, and disruption. But I don’t think the answer can simply be to slow everything down through regulation. That may reduce fear in the short term, but in the long term it makes Europe weaker and less able to protect its own citizens. The real challenge is to build a system that does both: supports people through the transition, while still allowing builders, researchers, and companies to move fast enough to compete globally. If Europe only chooses protection without innovation, we will end up with neither security nor competitiveness.
Nika

@andrasczeizel And that's why we are always those who fall asleep, and when we wake up, the world is in a different sphere. :D

Alper Tayfur

I think Europe’s biggest gap is not talent, it’s speed and density. Regulation, privacy, and trust can be real advantages, but only if they don’t come before the building. From the outside, it often feels like European founders have to spend too much energy navigating structure before they can even prove momentum.

Andras Czeizel
@alpertayfurr Exactly. Regulation, privacy, and trust could be real European advantages, but only if they support building instead of coming before it. Founders should not have to spend most of their early energy navigating complexity before they can even prove momentum. Europe needs structure, but it also needs speed and density.
Varun Mishra

I don't think Europe has a talent problem. It has a concentration problem.

Silicon Valley isn't just capital or universities. It's density. Founders, operators, investors, early adopters, and ambitious people constantly colliding with each other.

Europe has all of those ingredients, just spread across dozens of ecosystems that don't compound in the same way.

Andras Czeizel

@varun1jan Exactly. Europe does not lack talent, it lacks density and compounding.

The people, capital, universities, founders, and operators exist, but they are too fragmented across countries, languages, regulations, and ecosystems.

Silicon Valley works because everything reinforces everything else. Europe needs to create that same collision rate, but in a European way.

Sachin Mareedu

Nice product. The landing page makes the first action easy to understand.