Fundraisly - AI fundraising agent that finds investors and books meetings
Fundraisly: ultimate AI agent for fundraising. It analyzes 300K+ investors and millions of deals, identifies the relevant ones actively investing in your space, maps warm paths to them from your own network, then covers the rest with targeted cold outreach. The result: 20-40 qualified investor meetings. Built by founders who raised over $1B.


Replies
Remy AI
Hey team, happy launch. What CRM do you set up? Can it plug into an existing stack?
Fundraisly
@artyom_zhuravlev We set up a CRM system as part of the full-service plan that contains your entire investor funnel, organized by stage, status, and engagement. It's designed specifically for fundraising workflows, not generic sales.
Remy AI
@annmast got it, thanks — makes sense.
Fundraisly
@artyom_zhuravlev We have the CRM in the system, that is fundraising-specific and contains info about investors and leads for the outreach. If you already have a workflow, we use that context during onboarding so existing conversations don't get duplicated.
Remy AI
@alena_medvedevaa thanks, the duplicate outreach point is exactly what I was wondering about.
Fundraisly
@artyom_zhuravlev Appreciate the support!
Remy AI
@yauheni_savushkin Happy to support!
Good luck with the product ⭐️
Can I use Fundraisly only for the investor research part?
Fundraisly
@smetanka Yes, the lighter network analysis plan is built for that. It maps your existing connections to relevant investors and gives you a more focused funnel without running the full outreach campaign.
Fundraisly
@smetanka Research-only is supported. The lighter plan exists for exactly that: mapping the network and seeing where the funnel sits before deciding how aggressive to get.
Fundraisly
@smetanka Appreciate the support!
Fundraisly
@smetanka thanks for the support Alex!
Fundraisly
@smetanka thank you so much for your support!
Hey there
Are you in any way incentivized in a successful fundraising by your customers?
I mean, is your business model is “pay for our service” or rather “pay for your result”?
Fundraisly
@shishkinii Great question - and yes, we're deeply incentivized in every raise we work on.
Every campaign directly impacts our reputation, which means we only take on founders we genuinely believe in and go all-in when we do.
On the commercial side: right now our model is service-based (you pay for the platform and campaign execution). We're actively working toward a success fee structure, which is the natural evolution, but that requires us to obtain a brokerage license first. We're in that process.
Fundraisly
@shishkinii Ivan, good question :) Feels like we managed to get to the heart of it.
Fundraisly
@shishkinii Hey Ivan! Commercially, we currently operate on a service-based model (platform access and campaign execution), and we’re moving toward adding a success fee structure once we complete the required brokerage licensing process.
Good luck with the launch. Is this US-only, or do you cover Europe and Asia too?
Fundraisly
@alena_b Global: US, Europe, Israel, Southeast Asia, MENA, LATAM. If you're raising from European VCs or want a mix, we build your funnel accordingly. AI matches by geography.
Fundraisly
@alena_b Appreciate the support!
Fundraisly
@alena_b Thank you for your support Alena! We cover the worldwide fundraising market.
Fundraisly
@alena_b thank you for your support!
Emma Intelligence
Fundraisly
@xanderiang You should have your deck ready. We focus on getting it in front of the right investors, not on creating the pitch itself. That said, because our team has reviewed thousands of decks, we often give feedback on positioning and messaging during onboarding. But our core value is the distribution machine, not deck design.
Emma Intelligence
@annmast appreciate your answer 👋
Fundraisly
@xanderiang Thanks for the ask! A working deck has to be in place before outreach starts. We can flag obvious conversion issues in positioning or the ask, but we're not trying to replace a deck design or strategy process.
Emma Intelligence
What happens if the AI says my best investor targets aren't the names I expected?
Fundraisly
@okhlopkov That comes up regularly. We show the reasoning behind the list, then founders can approve, remove, or challenge targets before outreach starts. You can also add your investor list to the outreach campaign.
Fundraisly
@okhlopkov We provide the rationale behind each investor match, and founders can review, edit, or remove targets before anything is sent—plus you can always add your own investor list into the campaign.
Agentplace
Amazing product. Good luck!
Fundraisly
@systerr Appreciate the support!
Fundraisly
@systerr Really appreciate it!
Fundraisly
@systerr Thanks, means a lot!
Softr
good luck :)
Fundraisly
@boris_adamyan Thanks so much!
Fundraisly
@boris_adamyan Thank you Boris!
Fundraisly
@boris_adamyan Appreciate you taking the time to support us, Boris!
Fundraisly
@james_effarah1 Thank you, James! Fundraisly will soon be open to everyone, while still giving founders the option to work with our fundraising experts, including former VCs, throughout their fundraising journey.
Fundraisly
@james_effarah1 Thank you, James! Fundraisly will soon be open to all founders, with optional support from our team of fundraising experts and former VCs.
Tencent EdgeOne
Love how sharp the positioning is — "not a CRM, not a database" is the line most fundraising tools fail to draw clearly.
Curious about one thing: how do you handle the signal decay problem? A fund that was "actively investing in fintech" 6 months ago might have just closed their pocket, and the public signals (portfolio adds, partner tweets, LP letters) lag reality by a quarter or two. Is the agent re-scoring investor activity continuously, or is it more of a snapshot at outreach time?
Fundraisly
@maple_shaw Really sharp question - signal decay is probably the most underrated problem in investor intelligence, and you're right that most tools just ignore it.
Honest answer: public signals do lag. A partner tweet about "excited to back fintech" is often a post-facto announcement, not a leading indicator. We can't fully escape that.
What we do: the agent runs continuous monitoring rather than a point-in-time snapshot - it's re-scoring investor activity on an ongoing basis as new signals surface (portfolio page changes, co-investment patterns, public statements, job postings at portfolio companies, etc.). So by the time you're ready to reach out, you're working off the freshest available read, not a 6-month-old crawl.
Fundraisly
@maple_shaw Thanks for the question! Public investor signals often lag real activity, so a partner tweet or public statement is usually a trailing indicator rather than an early signal. To reduce this problem, our agent continuously monitors and re-scores investors using fresh data sources such as portfolio updates, co-investment activity, public statements, and hiring patterns, ensuring outreach decisions are based on the most current available intelligence rather than outdated snapshots.