Fundraisly - AI fundraising agent that finds investors and books meetings

@sooddvs Thanks, means a lot!

@sooddvs Thanks for checking it out Divesh! That means a lot

@sooddvs Appreciate your support!

@andrey_g_ It's not a redesign service, but our team has reviewed thousands of pitch decks from the investor side. If something will hurt conversion, like an unclear ask, weak positioning, or messy financials, we flag it. Think of it as a practical conversion check before distribution.

@aleks_smet The overlap on the surface is real because fundraising still needs tracking. The difference is that those tools help you manage a fundraise you are already running, while Fundraisly builds the target list, runs outreach, handles replies, and books calls. Visible's strength is post-meeting tracking and investor updates; we focus on getting qualified meetings onto the calendar.

@aleks_smet Visible is what you open after meetings happen. Fundraisly is what helps make the meetings happen. They sit at different points in the same process, so for a serious raise they can be complementary rather than mutually exclusive.

@nikita_bogdanov1 Yes, follow-ups are automated, but that's exactly where we put the most work in to make sure they don't feel that way.

The sequences are written per campaign, not pulled from a generic template. Timing, tone, and content are calibrated based on the investor's profile, thesis, and recent activity, so each touchpoint feels like a considered follow-up, not a drip sequence.

We also monitor replies in real time. The moment an investor responds, they're pulled out of the sequence and handed off for a human conversation. No one gets a follow-up after they've already replied.

The goal is that an investor reads it and thinks "this founder did their homework", not "this is a mass campaign."

@nikita_bogdanov1 Nikita, curious how Anna’s answer landed for you?

@anna_titova That's exactly the stage-fit problem we try to avoid. We don't rely only on what a fund says on its website; we look at recent investments, check-size patterns, partner activity, and whether similar companies actually got funded. The outreach also includes your deck and context, so investors know why they're being asked to take the call.

@anna_titova Ha, yes - exactly the pain. Curious what your honest read would be if you ever try Fundraisly.

@julia_sa Thank you very much! Your support means a lot 💙

@julia_sa Really appreciate it!

@julia_sa Appreciate your support!

@nicolas_spielmann Great news, our database covers 300K+ investors and several million portfolio deals, which means we have virtually every investor, deal, and market represented, including hospitality, across all stages and geographies. So yes, we absolutely work with hospitality startups.

Happy to dive into your specific case and give you an honest evaluation of what we can do for you. Reach out directly at am@fundraisly.com and we'll take it from there! 🚀

@nicolas_spielmann Appreciate the support!

@joe_rucker Really relevant question and actually a more common situation than most founders admit.

A few things work in your favor here. Family offices are a significant part of our investor database and many are actively deploying into tech, especially at early stage where ticket sizes align. So your existing warm connections to family offices aren't a liability, they may be direct paths to capital that's less competitive than traditional VC.

Healthcare executives as angels or check-writers is also a pattern we see a lot in healthtech, medtech, and enterprise SaaS with healthcare verticals.

The system doesn't penalize domain mismatch, it maps your warm paths as they are, then supplements with targeted cold outreach to traditional tech VCs where your network has gaps. So in practice you'd be running two tracks in parallel: leveraging your existing institutional finance connections where they're relevant, and building new warm paths into tech VC through the LinkedIn expansion layer.

@joe_rucker Appreciate the support!

@joe_rucker  appreciate you taking the time to understand the nuance here - and thank you for the support.

@ansari_adin Fair point, and worth saying out loud because founders genuinely lose sleep over this.

VCs are processing hundreds of emails a week. A well-crafted cold email that doesn't land isn't a reputation event, it's just noise that passes through. They won't remember it, and they certainly won't hold it against you when you reach out again with a warm intro six months later.

What actually ruins a founder's reputation in the VC community is dishonesty, inflated metrics, misleading decks, P&L that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. That travels fast and sticks. A cold email that didn't convert? Nobody's talking about that at a partner meeting.

The other side of this: we're not sending several emails a day to the same investor. The sequencing is measured, spaced out, and stops the moment there's a reply. And the target list is built for accuracy, if an investor isn't a genuine fit, they don't make the list in the first place.

Outreach done right is genuinely the safest part of the process 🙌

@ansari_adin Ansari, curious how Anna’s answer landed for you - does it address the concern?

@ikalimullin 100% true, thanks!

@ikalimullin Totally agree! Thank you for your kind words.

@ikalimullin Appreciate your support!