Bond - The AI to-do list that does itself

@kseniya_avtukhovich Heyy Kseniya 🌞

Yes, it works for individual contributors too 🚀.

Execs are the sharpest initial wedge because their context-switching and delegation load is extreme, but the underlying problem is broader: too much work spread across too many threads, and not enough context when you need to act.

For an IC, Bond is useful in a slightly different way: reconstructing the context around a task, finding the source thread, surfacing what changed, drafting follow-ups, and helping you keep track of all the little commitments that get buried in Slack/email/meetings.

So the product is especially strong for execs and chiefs of staff today, but the long-term vision is absolutely broader: anyone whose work depends on staying on top of many moving pieces should benefit.

@erinsellbrown Thank you Erin 😇, life could be a dream when we never drop another follow-up.

@natalia_iankovych Great question, Natalia 🙏
Phone calls are definitely on our radar, there are a lot of executive-assistant use cases there, from reservations to chasing information, but Bond doesn't make autonomous phone calls yet.

Today we're focused on the highest-volume written workflows first: email, Slack, calendar, meetings, todos, and follow-ups. That's where executives lose the most operational time, and it's also where we can keep the approval loop and audit trail very clear.

On languages: yes, the underlying AI can work across multiple languages, and we already think of Bond as needing to support international teams. The main thing we're careful about is quality and tone especially when Bond is drafting on someone's behalf, so we prefer to expand language support deliberately rather than claim every language is equally polished on day one.

What language would you want us to support ?
Thankss

@nicklinck yess!! When Bond has context on the whole team it naturally starts connecting the dots: who's blocked, what's dependent on what, where things are slipping. Game changer for async teams.

@nicklinck Let's make it happen my guy

@anshchopra thank you Ansh!

@abu_badr Here's a real example from my week: I ask Bond to pull up every lead I met with and or emailed. Then I say "draft follow-ups for all of them." Bond writes each email in my tone, with the context from the call or interaction, right in the web app chat, and I just edit or approve to send.

A task that would've taken me 2hours now takes me 5'. I no longer need to go digging through calendar events, piecing together call context, scanning sent mail trying to remember who I reached out to.

And honestly? Knowing it only takes five minutes means I actually do it and not procrastinate it (which might be one of the biggest pros of Bond that we don't talk about)

@moh_codokiai Both, but the second one is where it gets interesting. Bond does pull from your tools (calendar, email, Slack, Linear) but what it's really doing is building a model of you: your relationships, your commitments, what you own, what you've said you'd do. Over time it knows who matters, what's stuck, and what you're avoiding.

Users open it first thing because it's a reliable list of what actually needs to get done today. It removes the anxiety of "did I forget something?", the overwhelm of "I have 100 things, where do I start?", and the 2+ hours wasted bouncing between tools trying to build a list.

Your morning looks completely different with Bond. Instead of waking up and spending two hours just getting oriented, you open Bond and start getting things done.

@amna9 Very interesting question.

Bond's company brain already knows where the lines of authority and accountability actually sit: who owns what, who reports to whom, which relationships are strong and which are sensitive. So it's never delegating blind.

But the key part is you stay in full control. You decide who a task goes to, why, and how it's framed (tone of voice and all), and whether it's sent from Bond or in your own name. Nothing goes out without you steering it (unless you want to ofc). And because every item is backed by source data, the person on the receiving end sees the context too, not just a task dropped on them out of nowhere.

So the authority comes from you, Bond just makes sure it lands with the right person, the right framing, and the receipts to back it up.

Curious how you think about it: when you delegate, is the bigger risk the wrong person getting it, or just nobody actually owning the follow-through?

@mma_753 This really made my day. Thank you for the kind words Melissa!

@farrukh_butt1 Yup!! Love that you see the value in this :)

Curious how you currently decide what to-dos to prioritize? What specific problems have you run into?