Launching today
Bond is an AI Chief of Staff for executives. It connects to your tools, learns how your company works, and turns scattered tasks into a self-managing to-do list that always knows what you need to do next. You can ask Bond to prepare you for your next meeting, draft a follow-up, send an email, create action items, identify blockers, surface risks, or delegate tasks to team members.
Bond
Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I’m Chloe, co-founder and CEO of Bond.
Over the last few years, I’ve become obsessed with how exceptional leaders operate.
The best founders and CEOs aren’t smarter than everyone else.
They just have an obsession with how they spend their time.
The best leaders know exactly where their attention should go.
They know what matters, what doesn’t, and what’s at risk of slipping through the cracks.
The challenge is that as companies grow, keeping track of everything becomes a full-time job.
The information you need is scattered across email, Slack, meetings, docs, tasks, CRMs, and dozens of conversations happening simultaneously.
Before you can make a decision, you first have to gather the context.
What’s blocking the team?
Who owns this?
Did we follow up?
What’s changed since last week?
What am I forgetting?
Most leaders spend hours every day reconstructing the state of their business before they can actually get anything done.
That’s the problem we’re solving.
Bond is an AI Chief of Staff for high-performing founders and executives. It understands what’s happening across your company and proactively tells you:
• What matters most right now
• What’s falling behind
• What decisions need your attention
• What should happen next
A few things Bond has already done for early users:
✅ Flagged concerns about a candidate before a founder made a hiring decision
✅ Alerted a founder about a meeting with the CEO of a $10B company he’d almost missed with prep ready before it started
✅ Reminded a founder about a follow-up they’d forgotten for two weeks…the reply closed the deal
The goal is simple: you spend your attention on the work only you can do, and Bond handles the rest.
The entire team will be here all day answering questions and collecting feedback.
We’d love to hear what resonates, what doesn’t, and what you’d want Bond to do for you!
@chloesamaha definitely feeling this pain, is there a way for my more manual tasks to get done by bond?
Bond
@peterdambrosio yes! We have routines :)
Essentially any repetitive admin workflow you have: pre-meeting prep, follow ups, and investor newsletters are all things I've automated with Bond!
@chloesamaha thanks, signed up :)
@chloesamaha Congrats!! :)
Bond
@ipek_girgin thank you! Wouldn't have possible without the absolute legends on the team!
@chloesamaha Congrats on the launch team. How do you handle exec inaction (I know about it and just haven't done anything and so task age is increasing) and task priority?
Most AI assistants struggle with context retention across tools how does Bond maintain a coherent understanding of ongoing projects when executives are juggling 10+ active workstreams simultaneously?
@alexander_gray3 also curious how it priortizes stuff accordingly
Bond
@alexander_gray3 This is exactly the problem we built Bond around.
Most AI assistants only know what's in the current chat window, which falls apart when you're running 10+ things at once. Bond doesn't rely on the conversation to remember your company. It continuously builds a living company brain of it from your connected tools.
So instead of indexing raw text, Bond structures it: who said what, what are everyone's responsibilities, which project a ticket belongs to, what actually moved, and what's waiting on you vs. just noise. It learns what you own vs. what you're watching, carries context across conversations, and cross-references updates across tools against your to-dos, so it knows when something changed even if you never opened that app today.
It's not magic, and it gets sharper the more it syncs. But the bet is simple: you don't need a better chatbot, you need something that holds the whole picture together while you're busy running things, and that's the billion dollar problem we decided to destroy 😎
Triforce Todos
Congrats on the launch team 🎉
For a founder managing multiple companies or workstreams, can Bond handle separate contexts without mixing them up, or is it one unified view across everything?
Bond
@abod_rehman Thanks!
Totally fine btw. Many founders run multiple companies or workstreams, and Bond is designed for exactly that.
Hook up as many workspaces as you want. Each gets its own scoped context layer (isolated pipelines, permission-aware access, strict tenant boundaries). Bond won't mix them up.
But it will connect the dots within and across each: signals from Slack, Gmail, calendar, and your PM tools get linked to the right people and initiatives, always with source citations so you can trust (and verify) what you're seeing.
Unified intelligence, clean separation. That's the idea!
This seems built for rather big company CEOs with large teams. Does it work for early-stage founders like myself who are wearing 10 hats and have a very small team?
Bond
@jan_willem_denys early-stage is honestly where it shines at the moment. When you're wearing 10 hats nobody's catching the dropped balls but you...Bond does that part. Keeps the few things that matter today up top and handles the chasing/follow-ups in the background. Works whether your team is 2 or 200.
Bond
@jan_willem_denys Thankss Jan-Willem, lovely question.
While larger teams get a lot of value from Bond, we actually built it with the belief that early stage founders need a chief of staff even more!! Many of our earliest users are founders with very small teams, who use Bond as an AI chief of staff before they can justify hiring one.
Bond
@martijn_bonte yess!
Bond
@martijn_bonte In the era of AI agents, aren't we all becoming executives? 🤔
Bond
@martijn_bonte Definitely. Right now we're focussed on founders and executives just because they have the pain-point more than anyone else. But we're definitely rolling this out enterprise very soon :)
The blocker and risk surfacing piece is what stands out to me
BTW, how does Bond know something is actually at risk vs just behind schedule?
Is that a manual threshold or does it learn your working style over time?
Bond
@boyuan_deng1 Bond really looks for the bigger picture across your tools, "Behind schedule" is often not enough, but "behind schedule + someone mentioned a blocker" does.
This distinction really helps to cut through the noise that all these platforms are sending out.
Something can be late and fine. Something else can look on track but be one unanswered message away from stalling.
Indeed Bond learns your working style, when you push back or say "this isn't important," that sticks and changes what gets surfaced next time.
Hope this helps 🙏
Interesting idea, but “AI that knows what I need to do next” sounds like the hardest part here. How do you avoid it just becoming a noisy task aggregator across Slack/email/calendar?
Bond
@workout097_collab great question!! Avoiding "noisy aggregator" is the whole product. Our approach is to filter with context, not keywords. Bond pre-links every person, meeting, and responsibility before messages arrive, then nothing becomes a to-do unless it survives two checks: is this actually a commitment for YOU (not just your name near a verb), and does it matter vs. everything else on your plate? When it misses, your corrections stick. An aggregator of 10 tools' noise is worse than the 10 tools — Bond only deserves to exist if it's the opposite 🙏
Bond
@workout097_collab Honestly, this is the exact thing we position ourselves against.
There are a ton of AI assistants out there and they almost all fail at the same place: signal-to-noise. Anyone can one-shot a Pipedream MCP-everything integration, spin up a vector DB, and call it a day. But what you get back is noise with a tiny bit of signal buried in it.
Context is a double-edged sword. It's what creates the noise, but it's also the only place the real signal lives. That's why we threw all our effort into the company brain, an engine whose whole job is knowing what's actually real vs. what isn't.
So Bond is precision-biased on purpose. It filters out things like FYI chatter, bot notifications, wrong-owner asks, and figures out what's genuinely waiting on you, and backs every item with a source citation so you can verify it in one click. The bar to show you something is high, but the things that actually matter don't slip through, because the moment the list fills up with noise you stop trusting it, and a list you don't trust is worse than no list at all :)