Bond - The AI to-do list that does itself
by•
Bond is an AI Chief of Staff for executives. It connects to your tools, learns how your company works, and turns scattered tasks into a self-managing to-do list that always knows what you need to do next.
You can ask Bond to prepare you for your next meeting, draft a follow-up, send an email, create action items, identify blockers, surface risks, or delegate tasks to team members.
Replies
Risk identification is a bold capability to claim is Bond surfacing risks based on pattern recognition across your own company's data or is it applying more generalized heuristics?
@andrew_paul11 It's grounded in your data, not generic playbook heuristics, and that's the whole point.
Bond isn't going "70% of startups die from runway, beware." It learns your company's normal rhythm and flags when something breaks from your baseline: a thread gone quiet, a deal that hasn't moved in 12 days when it usually moves every 3, a commitment a teammate made three weeks ago that quietly died. The light layer of general heuristics just helps it know what tends to matter. The actual risks are 100% your reality, and every flag comes with sources, so it's never "Bond has a bad feeling," it's "here's the exact thread and why it looks off."
Does that make sense?
When Bond drafts a follow up email on behalf of an executive how does it learn and preserve the individual's tone communication style and relationship nuances with specific stakeholders?
@antonio_manuel1 A generic "AI-sounding" draft is worse than no draft, so this is something we obsess over.
Two layers:
your voice, learned from how you actually write (phrasing, formality, length), not a slider you configure.
The relationship, because you write to a co-founder differently than an investor, and Bond picks up that history instead of flattening everyone into one template.
@mayli8 Hi May! BOND chat supports all languages, so you can talk to it in whatever language you work in. The interface itself is English-only for now, but multilingual UI is definitely on our roadmap :) What language would you want to see first?
How does Bond handle sensitive information like board level strategy, M&A activity or HR matters that an executive would never want surfacing in a shared or improperly scoped context?
@carlos_leonardo1 This is the exact tension we designed around.
There is one shared company brain. That's what makes Bond more than a personal assistant. But access to it is scoped per person, so you only ever see through it what you're already allowed to see. Your DMs, private channels, and personal email feed your view and only yours. A colleague's Bond can't pull them, and yours can't pull theirs.
It's enforced at the data layer, not left to the AI to decide. Just like a teammate can't open a Slack DM they're not part of, their Bond literally can't return it either. Sensitive sources get flagged private the moment they're ingested, and every insight carries a source citation so nothing ever shows up "from nowhere." So: shared brain, shared context, but strict per-person walls on what each person can actually see.
Is the bigger worry for you something sensitive of yours leaking to your team, or their private context leaking to you?
Most executive workflows involve a lot of verbal context from calls and meetings does Bond integrate with transcription tools like Fireflies or Otter to capture and act on spoken decisions?
@new_user___10520260379921a76fc2d64 Notetakers are a gold mine for Bond. So many 'action items' from meetings get lost. But Bond captures them all.
Currently we're supporting: Granola, Clickup notetaker, Fireflies, Fellow, Fathom, Circleback. But we're adding them on the go as users ask for them :)
As an executive company scales the complexity of their operating environment grows exponentially how does Bond's architecture handle that scale without becoming a bottleneck or a noise machine itself?
@diego_joaquin1 Love this engineering question, it's the thing we obsess over.
We're basically filtering smartly through all the noise, and as a company grows, Bond does more filtering, not more pinging. There are only so many important todos you can do in a day, so our goal is to surface the ones that have the biggest impact and those that best align with your personal and company goals.
Very cool!
Will definitely give it a try.
@gilad_uziely Vamosss! Thankss Gilad 🤩
Oh, remember seeing bond come through here a few weeks back! the "reconstructing context before deciding" part really resonates - I juggle a lot of small and bigger tasks daily and having that context surface itself would save real time. Does bond work well for individual contributors too or is it mostly built for execs?
@kseniya_avtukhovich Heyy Kseniya 🌞
Yes, it works for individual contributors too 🚀.
Execs are the sharpest initial wedge because their context-switching and delegation load is extreme, but the underlying problem is broader: too much work spread across too many threads, and not enough context when you need to act.
For an IC, Bond is useful in a slightly different way: reconstructing the context around a task, finding the source thread, surfacing what changed, drafting follow-ups, and helping you keep track of all the little commitments that get buried in Slack/email/meetings.
So the product is especially strong for execs and chiefs of staff today, but the long-term vision is absolutely broader: anyone whose work depends on staying on top of many moving pieces should benefit.
The forgotten follow-up example hit home.
I've definitely had a few "Oh no, I meant to respond to that" moments. Not because I missed it, but because it got buried.
Congrats on the launch.
@erinsellbrown Thank you Erin 😇, life could be a dream when we never drop another follow-up.
Very interesting. Can your AI make phone calls to inquire about something or make reservations? There are a lot of use cases for that in this field. Does it support multiple languages?
@natalia_iankovych Great question, Natalia 🙏
Phone calls are definitely on our radar, there are a lot of executive-assistant use cases there, from reservations to chasing information, but Bond doesn't make autonomous phone calls yet.
Today we're focused on the highest-volume written workflows first: email, Slack, calendar, meetings, todos, and follow-ups. That's where executives lose the most operational time, and it's also where we can keep the approval loop and audit trail very clear.
On languages: yes, the underlying AI can work across multiple languages, and we already think of Bond as needing to support international teams. The main thing we're careful about is quality and tone especially when Bond is drafting on someone's behalf, so we prefer to expand language support deliberately rather than claim every language is equally polished on day one.
What language would you want us to support ?
Thankss
@theo_depraetere Calls are definitely a must-have ;) As for languages, I'm particularly interested in Ukrainian, though mainly for phone calls.