Bond - The AI to-do list that does itself

@andrew_paul11 It's grounded in your data, not generic playbook heuristics, and that's the whole point.

Bond isn't going "70% of startups die from runway, beware." It learns your company's normal rhythm and flags when something breaks from your baseline: a thread gone quiet, a deal that hasn't moved in 12 days when it usually moves every 3, a commitment a teammate made three weeks ago that quietly died. The light layer of general heuristics just helps it know what tends to matter. The actual risks are 100% your reality, and every flag comes with sources, so it's never "Bond has a bad feeling," it's "here's the exact thread and why it looks off."

Does that make sense?

@antonio_manuel1 A generic "AI-sounding" draft is worse than no draft, so this is something we obsess over.

Two layers:

1. your voice, learned from how you actually write (phrasing, formality, length), not a slider you configure.

2. The relationship, because you write to a co-founder differently than an investor, and Bond picks up that history instead of flattening everyone into one template.

@mayli8 Hi May! BOND chat supports all languages, so you can talk to it in whatever language you work in. The interface itself is English-only for now, but multilingual UI is definitely on our roadmap :) What language would you want to see first?

@carlos_leonardo1 This is the exact tension we designed around.

There is one shared company brain. That's what makes Bond more than a personal assistant. But access to it is scoped per person, so you only ever see through it what you're already allowed to see. Your DMs, private channels, and personal email feed your view and only yours. A colleague's Bond can't pull them, and yours can't pull theirs.

It's enforced at the data layer, not left to the AI to decide. Just like a teammate can't open a Slack DM they're not part of, their Bond literally can't return it either. Sensitive sources get flagged private the moment they're ingested, and every insight carries a source citation so nothing ever shows up "from nowhere." So: shared brain, shared context, but strict per-person walls on what each person can actually see.

Is the bigger worry for you something sensitive of yours leaking to your team, or their private context leaking to you?

@carter_son Exactly, Bond proactively flags blockers based on team activity, no manual "mark as stuck" needed.

It watches the real signal across your team via emails, messages, the things people commit to and then go quiet on. So when a task is waiting on someone, a thread stalls, or a follow-up never came back, Bond surfaces it as a blocker on its own.

Ofc, you can always flag things yourself too, but the magic is exactly what you're picking up on:
Bond catches the quiet blockers you'd otherwise miss, the ones that slip precisely because nobody thought to raise them. Hopefully this got you even more excited 🙏

@chen_hao3 Great question, and trust is exactly the thing we're most deliberate about.

Our moonshot is for Bond to be genuinely proactive, but we know not everyone is ready for that leap on day one.

So trust is something we earn gradually, not assume. The idea is to start small and let confidence compound. Early on, Bond drafts the email and you approve or deny it. Once you've seen it consistently get the tone and judgment right, you can raise the trust level, and let it send on your behalf.

So the AI being in the loop isn't hidden; it's visible and earned step by step. The broader team experiences it as nothing slipping through the cracks and faster follow-through, while the executive stays in control of exactly how much autonomy Bond has at any point.

@daniel_juan2 Personally one of my favorite features, let me explain: Bond builds up a profile of you and the people you work with, learning what your responsibilities are, and what your colleagues own too. Based on that, it can suggest the right person to delegate a task to, rather than leaving everything on your plate.

And that profile sharpens over time: the more Bond observes who handles what, through your emails, messages, and what you complete or pass along, the better it gets at telling what's truly yours to do versus what's better delegated to someone else. Hope this sparks some excitement 🚀

@new_user___10520260379921a76fc2d64 Notetakers are a gold mine for Bond. So many 'action items' from meetings get lost. But Bond captures them all.

Currently we're supporting: Granola, Clickup notetaker, Fireflies, Fellow, Fathom, Circleback. But we're adding them on the go as users ask for them :)

@diego_joaquin1 Love this engineering question, it's the thing we obsess over.

We're basically filtering smartly through all the noise, and as a company grows, Bond does more filtering, not more pinging. There are only so many important todos you can do in a day, so our goal is to surface the ones that have the biggest impact and those that best align with your personal and company goals.

@gilad_uziely Vamosss! Thankss Gilad 🤩