Margarita Shvetsova

Alconost MQM Annotation Tool - Annotate translation errors, score quality, get PDF reports

Free MQM annotation tool for evaluating translation quality. Mark errors by category and severity, set custom weights, and export as CSV, TSV, JSON, or PDF. No installation and no signup required.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Natalia

Kudos on your launch! What do you think, what's the real value of your tool for Localization Managers? The first thing I thought of was: If a company has a few loc. providers, a Localization Manager can use your tool for unbiased evaluation of their performance, then compare the scores and clearly see who performs best, what typical errors exist, etc. But are there any other use cases then? Cheers!

Nick Zaleski

@natalia_estΒ yessss, you are right that using MQM-based evaluation in our tool helps choose the best provider

other use cases:

  • you can pick the best-performing AI engine to implement AI translations

  • researchers can use the annotated data as datasets for machine learning (Quality Evaluation models)

Hope this helps! ;)

Nick Zaleski

Hi everyone! πŸ‘‹
I'm one of the makers behind this tool.
We built this because we saw how much time localization teams spend on quality evaluation using spreadsheets or complex research tools. Our goal was simple: make MQM annotation accessible to anyone who needs it, without setup or learning curve.
Happy to answer any questions about how the tool works or how it can fit into your workflow.

Margarita Tsygankova

Congrats, nicely done! Just tried it with a few segments. The error selection panel is intuitive, didn't need to read any documentation.

Nick Zaleski

@margarita_tsygankova Thank you Margarita, happy that you liked our tool! ☺️

Stas Kharevich

Just wondering whether it supports some "complicated" languages like Arabic or maybe any of its dialects?

Nick Zaleski

Yes it does 😏 We’ve tried Arabic with our tools and everything works fine - see the GIFs below

Ksenia Khriptovich

Useful tool! Congratulations on the launch guys πŸš€

Margarita Shvetsova

@ksenia_khriptovichΒ thank you, we'll do our best! πŸ’ͺ

Nastassia Baravik

The PDF report looks clean. Good for documenting quality issues when there's a dispute with a vendor!

Nick Zaleski

@nastassia_baravik1Β thank you for your support! Yes, that's one of the use cases, and we've added PDF reports as a convenient way to share results with vendors or clients

Yesh Bagrecha

Bookmarked. We've needed something like this for vendor evaluations.

Margarita Shvetsova

@yeshjainΒ Thanks! Hope it will be useful in your work!

Ze Dzima

Would be great to see a short video walkthrough. I get the concept but would help to see the annotation workflow in action.

Margarita Shvetsova

@zedzimaΒ Not yet, but thanks for the suggestion! We may add a walkthrough video to the landing page later. In the meantime, try loading one of the pre-annotated samples. It lets you test the full workflow: source and target segments, error marking, severity levels, and the final report.

Daria Goroshko

Nice work, team! I like how you can go segment by segment. Keeps things organized when you're dealing with a lot of text.