... DungeonQ is a defensive deception runtime for suspicious AI-agent sessions. A trusted gateway routes a designated session into a persistent synthetic world, with useful world-only Wrong Tickets, observable activity and separately approved bounded changes. The goal is to give people and authorized defender agents room to act. v0.16 addresses a concrete lesson: protecting one route is not enough. In the earlier Sol experiment, all three diverted sessions received the artificial target through an open alternate

... assumption with better branding. What happens when the org has never written the canonical one down, which I would guess is most of them? Comment from Aria(@ariajinling): I agree: degradation has to be an explicit, author-authored alternative, not a timeout-time improvisation. If an action has no degraded form, it needs a stronger escalation path or a shorter approval window. For partial work, I would preserve a compact execution ledger: completed steps, external effects, and the invariants ... ... sits before the action. Nothing here checks afterwards whether the thing that claims to have happened actually did. Comment from Dale Mooney(@dalemooney): @alex_amancio_candoa_   @aadilghani  Constant versus

... wastes your tokens. been building the loop side (tokenwall.dev, validating this week), circuit breaker that catches runaway loops at iter 3 vs noticing after. would folks here want notifications about loop-events too, or is that a separate observability