I m building a small tool called NordApply and I d really appreciate some honest feedback (brutal is fine).
The idea is simple: it helps tailor your CV to a specific job posting using only your real experience (no adding fake skills), generates a matching cover letter, and includes a voice-based mock interview.
It s currently free to try for CV/cover letter features.
I m not trying to promote it here ,I m genuinely trying to understand:
I m a UX designer who hates "pretty junk." I value logic, structure, and 200,000+ data points over flashy buttons. So I built Business GPT (Bunzee) to kill "startup fog" and validate ideas with cold, hard math.
The problem? It seems I ve built a tool that is so "logical" it might be boring. Or maybe the UX is just a nightmare that only I understand. I m tired of "nice tool!" comments that lead to zero retention. I need the brutal, ego-bruising truth.
That's one of the rabbit holes I went down for Edition #59 of Curiosity Saved The Cat, which went out this Sunday
His name was John Lubbock, and in 1871, he decided that workers and the financial system needed structured days on which banks could legally close (but not for the reason you might expect, as he had an interesting hobby he wanted to pursue).
Just launched AdOps Auditor an AI tool that audits campaign naming conventions for GAM, SFMC, and DOOH teams. Built it as a data engineer who kept seeing broken campaign names corrupt attribution data at scale. Free to try: adopsauditor.com
I'm excited to share that my new project, True Age, is now live.
Have you ever wondered how old your body really is? This tool provides a quick and free assessment of your biological age based on simple physical exercises and reaction time tests. No lab tests or medical equipment required.