Feedback wanted: AI that shows what’s really shipping into prod
Hey Product Hunt community 👋
I’m building something to solve a problem I keep running into as an engineer, and I’d love your feedback.
The problem:
AI tools like Copilot and Cursor are writing more of our code now.
PRs move faster. Reviews get shorter.
And honestly, it’s hard to tell:
how much of that code is AI-assisted
whether reviews are actually catching issues
or which PRs are risky before they hit production
Output is visible. Review quality isn’t.
What I built:
Cleq — a tool that connects to GitHub and tries to make this visible.
🤖 Detects AI-assisted code in PRs
⚠️ Flags PRs that look risky before merge
🛡️ Guardian Board — highlights reviewers who consistently catch issues (not just approve fast)
📊 PR Quality Board — shows which PRs are well-reviewed vs high-risk
Instead of ranking people by output, the goal is to surface who’s protecting the codebase and where quality is quietly slipping.
Where I’m at:
Early beta — onboarding a few teams and learning what’s signal vs noise.
My questions for you:
Does this feel like a real problem for your team?
What would you want this to show you that it doesn’t yet?
What would make you not trust a tool like this?
Thanks for any feedback - I’m building this based on what real teams need 🙏
Replies
Interesting idea. One thing I'm curious about is how you determine that something is actually "shipping into production" rather than just being merged or deployed to a staging environment. Do you integrate with deployment tools and CI/CD pipelines, or do you infer production releases from Git activity? It would also be useful to know how you handle rollbacks, hotfixes, and feature flags, since code can reach production without being visible to all users. Looking forward to hearing more about the technical approach behind this.