Naoma AI Demo Agent - The video AI demo agent for B2B SaaS for immediate demos
Turn “Book a demo” into “Get an AI demo now.” Naoma is the first video AI demo agent for B2B SaaS that delivers live, personalized demos in-browser 24/7 in any language. It clicks through real product flows, answers questions, qualifies prospects, and routes them to CRM, sales calendar, or checkout. Choose the avatar style: human-like, branded mascot, or a more formal look to engage your prospects.
Replies
While I am new to NAOMA, the rationale for the pivot from v1 to v2 really resonates and v2 sounds much more compelling to me in terms of my own use cases.
Any pro tips or explainers you recommend for someone new to this type of tool?
@nseldeib thank you, feel free to try it out on our website
@nseldeib thanks! Yep, David is spot on - the best would be trying it yourself. Happy to hear your feedback afterwards.
@nseldeib Thank you for your question, David - for the answer!
@nseldeib Many thanks!
Looks interesting. Just a small question here -- when a cost per demo can be $250-600 do you think it's reasonable to delegate it to an AI bot? I just try to understand the use cases of this tool. Upvoted 👍
@evgeny_kotelevskiy Great question, and the math is actually why Naoma makes sense here.
That $250-600 cost per demo includes SDR time, AE time, no-shows, and leads that weren't qualified to begin with. A significant chunk of that cost goes to demos that should never have happened.
Naoma doesn't replace the high-value human demo. It runs the first discovery layer: qualifying the lead, answering basic product questions, showing the product value relevant to that specific visitor, and capturing intent - so when a human rep does step in, they're talking to someone who already understands the product and is ready to move forward.
The result: fewer wasted demos, higher close rates on the ones that happen, and the leads who would have bounced on a 5-day Calendly wait actually convert instead.
So the question isn't "should AI run the $500 demo?" It's "how many of those $500 demos are currently happening with the wrong people or not happening at all?
@evgeny_kotelevskiy @dzmitry_ivanouski
Dima, thank you for your answer!
@dzmitry_ivanouski Appreciate your deep well-thought answer. When doing outreach we try to qualify leads during the email exchange or via a short call with an SDR before scheduling an actual call with a client. But when you deal with cold traffic (for example from Meta) and you simplify don't have any tools to qualify those leads before a demo call, Naoma seems to be a possible solution. Good luck!
@evgeny_kotelevskiy yes, exactly - we are currently only focused on the inbound funnel. Thanks again!
@evgeny_kotelevskiy thank you for your support!
@evgeny_kotelevskiy Thank you for your support!
The demo bottleneck is real. Sales teams wait days for a custom demo while the lead goes cold. If this can generate a personalized video demo on the spot, that's a different conversion game. I'm curious about the AI quality, though. B2B buyers are hard to impress. Does the demo feel scripted, or can it actually respond to what the prospect cares about? What's the average watch-through rate compared to a live sales call?
@aitubespark We care a lot about the "human feel" during the demo and constantly working on improvements.
@aitubespark The scripted vs. responsive question is exactly the right one to ask — and it's what separates Naoma from recorded demo tools or clickthrough tours.
The demo adapts in real time based on what the prospect actually says. If they mention a specific use case, the flow pivots to it. If they ask a question mid-demo, it answers and continues. It's not a linear script with a play button — it's closer to a conversation that happens to include a product walkthrough.
On watch-through rate — we don't share specific numbers publicly, but what we can say: average session length runs over 6 minutes for engaged prospects, and we only charge for demos over 3 minutes. The bounce rate exists — some people drop off early — but it's consistently lower than the average no-show rate on scheduled calls. A prospect who ghosts your Calendly invite costs just as much as one who clicks away in 20 seconds, except with Naoma you at least got them in the door.
B2B buyers are hard to impress — agreed. The ones we're seeing convert aren't impressed by the AI, they're impressed by getting a relevant answer to a specific question without waiting a week. That's the bar. 🙏
@aitubespark thanks for the comment and questions! See that Dmitry answered below
@aitubespark Thanks for the question!
Congrats on the launch! All the hardwork clearly paid off this last year. What verticals have you seen the most success with?
@masebuilds thanks for the support! It's been quite a ride, indeed!
Early traction has been strongest in B2B SaaS with a clear product to demo and meaningful inbound volume that isn't converting the way it should. Think mid-market tools where the "Book a Demo" gap is costing real pipeline.
Still early days, so we're actively learning which verticals feel the pain most acutely.
Curious, what vertical are you in?
@masebuilds thank you!
@masebuilds Dima's answered. Thank you for the question!
@masebuilds Thank you!
Maybe you should start a collab with ProductHunt for their demo feature :) Or? :)
@busmark_w_nika maybe we should!
@busmark_w_nika @david_klassen To be honest, we've already thought about it :)
@david_klassen @dmitry_zakharov_ai Time to reach out to them :)
@david_klassen @busmark_w_nika yeah, I guess, we should try!
@busmark_w_nika Thank you!
@busmark_w_nika nice catch! @product any thoughts on that?
@product @dzmitry_ivanouski I think you tagged the wrong account :D
@busmark_w_nika my bad! was a bit of a hectic launch :-)
@dzmitry_ivanouski It's okay :D
Very cool concept.
Replacing “Book a demo” with an instant AI demo makes a lot of sense for SaaS products.
Curious how well the agent handles deeper product flows and real questions from users.
@new_user___2902025abb5753b18b341a5 Thank you! We provide a knowledge base and a sales playbook that helps to handle those type of questions
@new_user___2902025abb5753b18b341a5 thanks for the support! It handles it well - just try the agent on our website. Would be grate to hear your feedback on that.
@new_user___2902025abb5753b18b341a5 thank you for the question! David handled it
@new_user___2902025abb5753b18b341a5 Thanks so much for the feedback!
We've been wrestling with this exact problem at Jupid — our "Book a Demo" button creates a 5-7 day gap that kills a surprising share of inbound intent. The stat that caught my eye: 10-20% visitor-to-demo conversion. What's the typical session length before a prospect either qualifies themselves out or routes to a human? And does Naoma work well for products that have a steeper learning curve, where the demo itself needs to answer "do I even need this?"
@ilya_lee yes we work with complicated software, like hotel business automation software, etc
@ilya_lee, thanks for the support!
This resonates - the 5+ day gap is exactly the pattern we kept seeing before building Naoma.
On session length: typically 10-20 minutes, though it varies by product complexity.
On the "do I even need this?" question, that's actually where Naoma performs best. The first job of the demo isn't to show features, it's to help the prospect understand whether the problem you solve is their problem. A good AI agent can walk that diagnostic conversation naturally, which is harder to do in a static product tour or a 30-minute scheduled call where the rep is already in pitch mode.
Would love to show you how it could work for Jupid specifically - happy to jump on a call.
@ilya_lee Dima has answered and thank you for your support!
@ilya_lee Thanks for the comment and questions!
Congrats to the launch, sure a useful tool. I especially like the aesthetics, Naoma looks very nice and professional, also good choice of colors I think. Wish you success!
@konrad_sx thank you, man! Some say it's too cartoony - but we believe it's cool ;-) also, we have a lot of other avatars options to choose from
@konrad_sx thank you!
@konrad_sx thank you Konrad!
@konrad_sx Thanks so much for the feedback!
I think you have found a sweet spot when for a company employing humans it may be prohibitively expensive to do a live demo to every qualified lead; you are practically dropping the threshold to mere dollars, not hundreds of dollars per demo.
@max_kraynov yes, exactly!
@max_kraynov exactly! Thank you!
@max_kraynov , yes, thanks for the comment
Hey builders, good luck with the launch.
How does Naoma know how to interact with the product which it is selling?
@andrew_mende2 thank you! She has access to browser automation tools uses them to do a product walkthrough.
@andrew_mende2 @david_klassen thank you for your answer!
@andrew_mende2 Thank you!
@andrew_mende2 thank you for the great question!