AI therapy you can actually talk to. Just speak naturally and get support anytime you need it.
Replies
Best
Voice-first + evidence-based CBT is a strong combo â if it truly balances empathy with gentle challenge, this could be a meaningful bridge between sessions for a lot of people. Wishing you thoughtful growth here.
Report
The line between "AI therapist" and "AI companion" is getting blurry, and Lovon sits right in the middle. A lot of users already turn to companion apps like Replika for emotional support even though those apps aren't designed for therapy. The fact that you built this with PhD psychologists from the start is a meaningful differentiator.
One thing I've noticed testing companion platforms is that voice-based interaction changes the dynamic significantly. Users tend to be more emotionally open in voice conversations than text, which raises the stakes on response quality. A flat or generic response in text is forgettable. In voice, it breaks trust immediately.
Are the evidence-based frameworks (CBT, EFT) hard-coded into the conversation flow, or does the model apply them more flexibly based on what the user is talking about?
Report
Voice-first for therapy makes SO much sense. Expressing emotions through typed text always felt like there was a barrier â something gets lost when you're just staring at a keyboard trying to articulate how you feel!
Report
Mental health tooling for consumers is one of those spaces where the gap between "technically functional" and "actually helpful in a vulnerable moment" is enormous â and getting that right is genuinely hard. Curious how you've approached the moment when someone's distress exceeds what an AI should handle alone â is there a structured escalation path to human professionals, or does that handoff still rely on the user to self-identify when they need more?
Report
Voice-first is such a meaningful choice here. There's something about speaking out loud that bypasses the armor we put on when we type. The fact that you built with a PhD psychologist and chose not to just "agree" with people â that distinction matters deeply. The hardest thing in emotional support isn't saying the right thing. It's staying present long enough to hear what someone actually means. Rooting for this.
Report
I installed the app but there is no Google connect. I have to set up the email and password manually. It's kind of a turn-off and a major friction because I don't know where to save the password.
Report
Very cool. Are you mandated to be HIPPA compliant? How is user's data stored?
Report
Hi, congrats on the launch, just tried the app on my iPhone. I like the simplicity of the UI, and the idea of automatic matching with a therapist based on questions. I did find that list of questions a bit long, to be honest. I then tried a session, and everything I said was incorrectly transcribed - I have an accent, but it is not that terrible and I am normally well understood (by humans and AI). So just to let you know that perhaps if you want to get more non-native English speakers then that is an area to look into.
Replies
Voice-first + evidence-based CBT is a strong combo â if it truly balances empathy with gentle challenge, this could be a meaningful bridge between sessions for a lot of people. Wishing you thoughtful growth here.
The line between "AI therapist" and "AI companion" is getting blurry, and Lovon sits right in the middle. A lot of users already turn to companion apps like Replika for emotional support even though those apps aren't designed for therapy. The fact that you built this with PhD psychologists from the start is a meaningful differentiator.
One thing I've noticed testing companion platforms is that voice-based interaction changes the dynamic significantly. Users tend to be more emotionally open in voice conversations than text, which raises the stakes on response quality. A flat or generic response in text is forgettable. In voice, it breaks trust immediately.
Are the evidence-based frameworks (CBT, EFT) hard-coded into the conversation flow, or does the model apply them more flexibly based on what the user is talking about?
Voice-first for therapy makes SO much sense. Expressing emotions through typed text always felt like there was a barrier â something gets lost when you're just staring at a keyboard trying to articulate how you feel!
Mental health tooling for consumers is one of those spaces where the gap between "technically functional" and "actually helpful in a vulnerable moment" is enormous â and getting that right is genuinely hard. Curious how you've approached the moment when someone's distress exceeds what an AI should handle alone â is there a structured escalation path to human professionals, or does that handoff still rely on the user to self-identify when they need more?
Voice-first is such a meaningful choice here. There's something about speaking out loud that bypasses the armor we put on when we type. The fact that you built with a PhD psychologist and chose not to just "agree" with people â that distinction matters deeply. The hardest thing in emotional support isn't saying the right thing. It's staying present long enough to hear what someone actually means. Rooting for this.
I installed the app but there is no Google connect. I have to set up the email and password manually. It's kind of a turn-off and a major friction because I don't know where to save the password.
Very cool. Are you mandated to be HIPPA compliant? How is user's data stored?
Hi, congrats on the launch, just tried the app on my iPhone. I like the simplicity of the UI, and the idea of automatic matching with a therapist based on questions. I did find that list of questions a bit long, to be honest. I then tried a session, and everything I said was incorrectly transcribed - I have an accent, but it is not that terrible and I am normally well understood (by humans and AI). So just to let you know that perhaps if you want to get more non-native English speakers then that is an area to look into.