Insightix
The same event, priced differently across markets
Start new thread

Insightix - The same event, priced differently across markets

by•
Insightix tracks the live probability of the same event across prediction markets and derivatives/sports data — and alerts you the moment they disagree. Crypto, sports & esports. De-vigged, normalized, apples-to-apples. Information only, not advice.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Chris, one of the makers. The same event gets priced on several markets at once — prediction markets, the Deribit options chain, sports data providers — and they rarely agree. When Polymarket prices France at 39% to win the World Cup and our reference says 23%, that 16-point gap is real information no single order book shows you. Insightix tracks those gaps automatically: it reads both markets, de-vigs and normalizes them so the gap is fair, and pushes the widest divergences to your Telegram in real time. Crypto, sports & esports. Free to browse; information only, not advice. 🎁 PH offer: 50% off with code Y5MTG3MA (card), through July 31. Would love your feedback on which markets to add next 🙏

honestly this looks really useful for finding mispricings, one thing i'd love is a backtest mode where i can replay historical divergence alerts to see which ones actually moved the market afterward, basically a way to filter out noise before trusting the signals live

Maker

 This is exactly where we're headed, Under the hood we already keep a full observation ledger of every divergence we evaluate, plus a resolver that back-fills how each market actually settled — so the data for a "replay & see what moved" mode already exists. Surfacing it as a hit-rate / resolution view is high on our list. Would you want it as a filter (only show signals with a strong historical resolution rate) or a standalone backtest view? Thanks for the sharp feedback

The discordance alerts on esports matchups caught me off guard — saw two platforms pricing the same game with a 12% gap that closed within minutes. Clean, no-noise feed and the de-vigged math actually lines up.

Maker

 Love hearing this — those fast-closing esports gaps are some of the sharpest, because two platforms disagree and one just hasn't repriced yet. Glad the de-vigged math held up for you. If there's a line or vertical you'd want us to cover next, tell us — we're adding them

Really useful concept since mispricings across markets are where the edge lives. One thing that would make it even better is a backtested alert feed showing each divergence's eventual resolution, so I can see how often a given spread actually meant anything before acting on it.

Maker

 100% — knowing how often a spread actually resolved is the line between signal and noise. Good news: we already log every divergence and its eventual resolution internally (it's how we validate the engine), so a per-signal "resolution history / hit-rate" is very buildable and near the top of our roadmap. Really appreciate you framing it so clearly