Insightix - The same event, priced differently across markets

byβ€’
Insightix tracks the live probability of the same event across prediction markets and derivatives/sports data β€” and alerts you the moment they disagree. Crypto, sports & esports. De-vigged, normalized, apples-to-apples. Information only, not advice.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
πŸ“Œ
Hey Product Hunt πŸ‘‹ I'm Chris, one of the makers. The same event gets priced on several markets at once β€” prediction markets, the Deribit options chain, sports data providers β€” and they rarely agree. When Polymarket prices France at 39% to win the World Cup and our reference says 23%, that 16-point gap is real information no single order book shows you. Insightix tracks those gaps automatically: it reads both markets, de-vigs and normalizes them so the gap is fair, and pushes the widest divergences to your Telegram in real time. Crypto, sports & esports. Free to browse; information only, not advice. 🎁 PH offer: 50% off with code Y5MTG3MA (card), through July 31. Would love your feedback on which markets to add next πŸ™

The discordance alerts on esports matchups caught me off guard β€” saw two platforms pricing the same game with a 12% gap that closed within minutes. Clean, no-noise feed and the de-vigged math actually lines up.

Β Love hearing this β€” those fast-closing esports gaps are some of the sharpest, because two platforms disagree and one just hasn't repriced yet. Glad the de-vigged math held up for you. If there's a line or vertical you'd want us to cover next, tell us β€” we're adding them

Β This is exactly what you asked for β€” so we built it, and it's live

Two things:

β€’ The aggregate: for every alert we've sent, how often the gap actually closed. The wider the gap, the more reliably β€” 10pp+ divergences narrowed 91% of the time (median 34% of the gap closed).

β€’ The replay you described: real past alerts with the gap trajectory over the days that followed.

Cases are picked by the gap size at the alert (not by outcome), so it's not cherry-picked β€” a 40% case sits right next to the 96% ones. Convergence only, not a profit claim. Would love your read

Really useful concept since mispricings across markets are where the edge lives. One thing that would make it even better is a backtested alert feed showing each divergence's eventual resolution, so I can see how often a given spread actually meant anything before acting on it.

Β 100% β€” knowing how often a spread actually resolved is the line between signal and noise. Good news: we already log every divergence and its eventual resolution internally (it's how we validate the engine), so a per-signal "resolution history / hit-rate" is very buildable and near the top of our roadmap. Really appreciate you framing it so clearly

Β 100% β€” and it's live now.

We backtested every alert: 5–10pp gaps narrowed 72% of the time, 10pp+ gaps 91% (median 34% of the gap closed).

And per-signal, with the actual gap trajectory: β€” picked by how wide the gap was, not how it turned out, so the honest mix shows (there's a 40% right next to the 95s). Thanks for pushing us on this one

Update from the makers πŸ› οΈ

A few of you asked the same great question: "does a flagged divergence actually mean anything?" So we shipped the answer:

β€’ Backtest β€” for every alert, how often the gap closed (10pp+ gaps: 91%).

β€’ Track record β€” real cases with the gap trajectory.

Convergence only (not profit claims), selected by gap size not outcome. 🎁 50% off with code Y5MTG3MA (card) through Jul 31. Keep the feedback coming