How is GhostCheck different from Nessus?

Most vulnerability scanners match service banners against CVE databases

and report everything as a "potential" finding. The result is 200 findings

where maybe 10 are real.

GhostCheck takes a different approach — every finding goes through a live

verification probe before it appears in your report. If it can't prove the

vulnerability exists with real evidence, it doesn't get reported.

Would love to hear from security professionals — how much TIME do you

currently spend triaging false positives? And what would a ZERO false

positive scanner change about your workflow?