Nika

Who is more likely to be replaced sooner? White collar vs Blue collar workers

2 significant things are circulating on the internet simultaneously this week:

  • A tweet about how a human beat a machine (a 10-hour livestream in which a human sorted packages and compared it to the productivity of a robot).

  • Or an announcement of a Microsoft AI chief that predicts AI will automate most white-collar work within 18 months.

While I don't think there will be a complete replacement of humans in either case, I do think we will see mass layoffs. My guess is that it will be white-collar jobs first.

The question is, if one option wins, how do we ensure the energy efficiency of these AI/robotic solutions and how do we ensure that it is cheaper than humans?

394 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Ali Haider

The energy efficiency point is underrated. People compare AI to human salaries, but me thinking about the electricity, cooling, GPUs, and hardware replacement costs makes the equation much more complicated.

Nika

@ali_haiider + we may run out of sources, electricity, oil etc.

Kim Lindberg

@ali_haiider  @busmark_w_nika I do think the energy efficiency needs to be addressed more. Power will be more scarce than oil!

Ali Haider
Aleksandar Blazhev

I think the most likely answer is: neither group gets “replaced” in a clean, simple way.

White-collar work will probably change faster, but change is not the same as disappearance.

Office jobs existed before the 1990s. Then computers, the internet, email, Excel, CRMs, and cloud software completely changed how those jobs worked. But Excel did not magically make someone a good financier. It made good finance people faster, and it changed what was expected from everyone else.

I see AI in its current form in a similar way. It will remove or compress many repetitive office tasks, raise the bar for junior roles, and make one person capable of doing more. But it does not automatically replace judgment, accountability, client trust, domain expertise, taste, or decision-making.

Blue-collar work feels even safer over the next 10–20 years, especially skilled trades. A robot might work well in a controlled warehouse, but repairing a roof, renovating a bathroom, fixing plumbing, dealing with an old building, or solving messy on-site problems is a very different challenge. In fact, I’d argue many skilled physical jobs may become more valuable, not less. Fewer young people want to do them, demand is still there, and the work is hard to standardize.

Аlso an interesting report:

https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/how-will-ai-affect-the-us-labor-market

Nika

@byalexai This is a valid point, and I am also surprised how blue-collar workers are safer than they were expected to be (we all thought that they were endangered). And I can see how many people are not able to do physical things. So yeah, constructors will be sitting on money.

Mikita Aliaksandrovich

I think “replacement” is the wrong mental model. The bigger shift is compression: smaller teams producing dramatically more output. That’s especially true in software, where execution can already be parallelized through AI systems, workflows, and review loops. The companies that adapt fastest probably won’t replace everyone overnight - they’ll just move much faster with fewer bottlenecks.

Nika

@mikita_aliaksandrovich I think that word "compression" described it pretty well. I also think that companies will shrink but still hire humans.

Bengeekly

My prediction years ago was that humans would remain the most artistic in like music, drawing, and video. Now I see I was clearly wrong, because AI can do music, image editing, and video creation, but it still isn’t good at logical tasks and it hallucinates when dealing with logic. It’s hard to predict the future.

Nika

@bengeekly yeah, maybe tomorrow they will launch something that will replace human in a physical world :D

Bengeekly

@busmark_w_nika Honestly, it wouldn't shock me, while we are all looking at white-collars being replaced.
Tesla and Nvidia can tomorrow make a huge step with a robot and instantly change the game.
What really surprise us right now are huge steps

Nika

@bengeekly this era is more unpredictable than ever.

Ajin Sunny

Anything that involves the use of a laptop is going to disappear like lightning.

Nika

@ajinsunny I am doomed then. 😬

Ajin Sunny

@busmark_w_nika We will all be talking to agents who will scour the internet.

Donnie

I believe that it will be the apathetic first. -those who lack social skills and work ethic. That's already happening.

Nika

@dstr88 yes, especially those people who are not flexible go first.

MD Amirul Islam

Super interesting discussion, and it hits a real tension right now.

The way I see it, white-collar jobs are getting “task-exposed” faster because anything that is digital, repetitive, or text-based is easier for AI to automate (writing, analysis, reporting, support, etc.). Blue-collar work is more protected in the short term because it needs physical execution in messy real-world environments.

But the twist is: long-term, both sides get hit differently—white-collar gets automated faster, blue-collar gets affected more slowly through robotics.

So instead of “who is replaced first?”, it might be more accurate to ask: which jobs get redefined first rather than fully replaced?

Curious where this goes in the next 5–10 years 👀

Nika

@1mirul that's true. More people are likely to put something into GPT and have an output. But not so many people get up and start doing something physical.

Artem Fedorovich

interesting that we frame it as binary replacement. as someone who actually hires service firms (agencies, CPAs, consultants), what i see on the buyer side is augmentation, not substitution.

i use AI for grunt work — first-draft research, boilerplate copy, cleanup - but when stakes are real i still pay humans. not because they do the task better, but because i can call them, hold them accountable, and they have a relationship to protect.

so the question is less "which job gets replaced" and more "which deliverables can be detached from accountability." commodity stuff yes. judgment-heavy work, not - at least until liability and trust can transfer to an AI vendor, which is a harder problem than model quality.

curious - when you imagine "mass white-collar layoffs," do you mean the work disappears, or that it gets repriced and stays?

Nika

@artem_fedorovich it will stay, but not in the human response so much imo

Alan robert

I also think white collar jobs will feel the impact first because software based work is easier to automate than physical tasks in unpredictable environments. Replacing a spreadsheet workflow is simpler than replacing a plumber in a real house.

Nika

@alan_robert yeah, but the question still is at what extent we can do that so it will be cheaper than human.

Vladimir Tsaran

For many generations man has been dreaming to have machines to do all the work for us and now we are so close and it scares us. I can say that it is impossible to stop progress but it is possible. we will see. The society is facing new challenges and no matter who will be first white or blue.

Nika

@vladimir_tsaran1 We were excited to get rid of tasks that we didn't like... and here we are, it replaces the tasks that give us job and the money for food :)

123
Next
Last