Brew - Like Claude design for email marketing
by•
Brew is the fastest way to design and send beautiful, on-brand emails and automations that render perfectly in every inbox. Describe a campaign or a multi-step automation in plain English, and Brew builds the whole thing in seconds: copy, design, audience, and logic. Works with any AI agent: paste our docs into OpenClaw, Viktor, Claude, or Lovable. No lock-in: send from Brew or export to your ESP. Free to get started.
Replies
Super stoked for this!
I needed to send on brand emails for one of my own side projects. Brew was a tremendous help. My favorite part is how I just gotta enter my domain and keep sending unique emails still sticking to the aesthetic, theme and taste of my brand.
Appreciate you @tiger_abrodi ! Love that the brand sticking across every send is your favorite part, that is the exact thing we obsessed over. Proud of what the whole team shipped including you shipped here!!
FiloMail
Congrats on the launch!
I really like the positioning here. It is easy to understand, but the part that stands out to me is the last mile: not just generating nice-looking email drafts, but turning them into on-brand, production-ready campaigns and automations that can actually be sent through the tools teams already use.
As someone working around AI + productivity, I think email is one of those areas where pretty demos are easy, but reliable execution is hard. Brand consistency, lifecycle logic, ESP handoff, and rendering across inboxes are where the real value is.
Curious how you think about the rendering/testing layer over time, especially for Outlook, Gmail clipping, and dark mode. If Brew can keep that reliable while making campaign creation feel this lightweight, this could become a very useful tool for growth and lifecycle teams.
Upvoted. Excited to see where this goes.
Thank you @justin_bao, and you have pinpointed exactly where we think the real value sits. Pretty demos are easy in email. Reliable execution across brand, lifecycle logic, ESP handoff, and rendering is the hard part, and it is the part we decided to obsess over.
On the rendering and testing layer over time, the way we think about it is that reliability has to be structural, not a patch we keep applying. Generation is constrained to email-safe building blocks rather than free-form code, so the output cannot drift into something that breaks Outlook, and we keep expanding our testing and evals across real clients as new quirks show up.
Outlook, Gmail clipping, and dark mode are the three we watch most closely, because they are exactly where tools quietly fail. The goal is that the reliability holds as the creation experience gets lighter, not at the expense of it.
Really appreciate the thoughtful read, and good luck with FiloMail.❤️🔥
GrowMeOrganic
The integration with tools like @Brevo is interesting. So we adopt Brew without full switching our stack. Well done.
Brew
@iamanantgupta Thanks Anant :)
Curious how Brew handles multiple parallel campaigns, is it one workspace per brand, or can you run separate sequences with their own logic side by side?
For context: Our team runs nurture sequences across pretty different client segments and keeping every campaign on-brand at that volume eats up real time...
Nice product btw!
Brew
@marcelo_macedo2 Hey Marcelo! Would love to learn more about these nurture sequences. Are these different multi email sequences that run for different segments or different brands?
@marcelo_macedo2 One workspace per brand, but you can run as many automations and campaigns in parallel as you want inside it. All of your sequences can be live at the same time with separate logic. And if you're running multiple brands, Brew's multi-brand support handles that too. Each client's fonts, colors, and voice are locked in from the start so you're not burning time testing every client segment you send. The volume stops being the bottleneck.
Magic Patterns
Thank you @alexdanilowicz, means a lot coming from you and the @Magic Patterns team. Grateful to have had you with us since the early days. Bullish right back at you. ❤️🔥
Been using Brew with the Customer IO integration the past two months, and it works perfectly. We send broadcast emails 5 times per week, and it's traditionally been a huge hassle to produce the content and design the emails — but it's fast (and much better) now. I especially like how we can get very differentiated versions of an email in no time. Reminds me of website building in Lovable. Highly recommend it to any marketers or founders out there!
Thank you @langhede! ❤️🔥
Five broadcasts a week is a brutal cadence to keep up by hand, so it means a lot to hear Brew made it fast and better. The differentiated variants are the feature we love most too, and the Lovable parallel is exactly what we are going for. Grateful for the recommendation, and glad @Customer.io has been working seamlessly with Brew.
Marketing Ideas
Love it! Congrats on the launch 🚀
Thank you @tomorbach ! ❤️🔥
Station
Glad to have you @campritchard ❤️🔥
congrats on the launch :) this feels like a very obvious pain point to go after. i like that it’s not just “generate an email”, but the whole messy part around brand, sequence logic, variants, and inbox-safe html.
curious how the workflow feels once brew has made the first version. do teams usually treat it as ready to send, or is there a review/tweak step before it goes live?
Thanks @kar_re, and you have summed up the hard part exactly...
The first version is meant as a strong starting point, not a press-send-and-walk-away moment. Most teams treat it like a great first draft: it gets you 90 percent of the way there, then you refine in chat (make this punchier, swap the hero, tighten the CTA) and give it a quick review before it goes live.
The point is not to remove the human, it is to delete the tedious production work so the human can focus on the judgment calls.
Honestly, for email going out to thousands of people, you want that review step, and we would never want to take it away. ❤️🔥
@philip_sorensen nice, that’s a good distinction. also love that the “human stays in the loop” part is explicit instead of pretending review can disappear entirely.
Exactly @kar_re. The tools that pretend review can vanish are the ones that scare me, especially in email where a mistake goes to thousands of people at once. Appreciate you thinking it through with me, and thanks again for the support. 🔥
Yapify
Congrats on the launch, love it! A good email still goes a long way, and I think people don’t spend enough time crafting genuinely thoughtful emails anymore, instead they just blame the whole “channel” and say email is dead.
Thank you@dan_meier1 ! Couldn't agree more!