Why does code evolve, but knowledge stays static?

I've been thinking about this question for a long time.

Code has GitHub. It has version history, collaboration, attribution, forks, reputation, and entire communities dedicated to improving existing work.

Knowledge doesn't.

A workflow is published once and forgotten.
A guide becomes outdated.
A research document sits in a Google Drive folder.
A prompt collection lives in a Notion page.
A creator's audience gets split across multiple platforms.

The more I looked at it, the more it felt strange that some of the most valuable things on the internet are treated as static assets.

That's one of the reasons AIMD exists.

The long-term vision isn't simply to create another marketplace for digital products. It's to create an ecosystem where knowledge can evolve, where creators can build communities around their work, and where resources can improve over time rather than becoming obsolete.

I'm curious how others here think about this.

If you could change one thing about how knowledge is shared online today, what would it be?

I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts and use them to help shape the platform.