... Netfox 0.13.0 the endpoint that refuses to be careless Netfox can expose a read-only metrics endpoint, so your own monitoring can scrape your network. Handy and, it turns out, far too easy to leave wide open. Switch on "allow access from other devices" without setting a token and that endpoint was reachable from anywhere on your network with no authentication at all . What it serves is your entire device inventory: every IP, every MAC address, every hostname, every open ... ... port. That's fixed, and it's the kind of fix I'd rather tell you about than quietly bury in a changelog. It fails closed. No token, no network endpoint. Netfox refuses

... path. In a year of tools that hallucinate with total confidence, we're betting on the opposite: know when you don't know. Quietly wiring this in now. Full reveal Aug 2 . Comment from Raj Nagulapalle(@rnagulapalle): honestly the "refuses to guess" part came from getting burned by my own tools. i'd describe a bug, the agent would confidently open the wrong file, and i'd lose an hour before realizing it just guessed. so we made ours read ...

... writing better code. After thousands of hours of building, I realized I was wrong. Code doesn't create a product. It gives shape to an idea. The real beginning happens much earlier. It starts with a question that refuses to leave your mind. The kind of question that stays with you while you're working, walking, reading, or trying to sleep. Months pass. Sometimes years. Yet the question keeps growing until building becomes the only way to answer it. Looking ... ... survive long enough to deserve becoming reality. So I'd like to ask every builder here: What was the first question that made you start building your product? Not your business model. Not your first feature. The question that refused

... Argon2id, KDF params + salt bound as AAD. same passphrase as layer one so an old key buried in history isn't readable by another process, MCP client, or synced backup without it. fail closed -- passphrase absent > the store refuses to open, never a silent fallback to plaintext. scope gating: per client. MCP access is by scoped token; hand an agent a token bound to a specific session (or set), and it can't widen to the whole corpus. cross ... ... corpus reads (e.g. corpus wide semantic search) are refused

... intention of helping companies (and a little bit of fear of not being fired), we are collaborating on a project that will replace us. So the question here is not "if" but "when". And presumably, if the employees refused, someone else would be found to do it. Is there any way to object to AI training, which is preparation for our dismissal? Are there any laws that can protect employees? What can happen to the social system, people and their ... ... sounds harsh, but every major technological shift has destroyed some jobs and created others. When factories, cars, electricity, computers, and the internet arrived, they all replaced parts of the old economy. Should factory workers 100 years ago have refused

... open Chrome or control your browser. I'm a code assistant, I work with files, run shell commands, and help with software engineering tasks. Today, that same Claude books flights for me, fills out forms, checks competitor pricing every morning at 9am, and triages my email before I sit down at my desk. The difference is an MCP server called OpenOwl (adds screenshot, click, type, OCR tools to Claude) plus a specific prompting pattern I figured out through trial ... ... error. The core problem: if you ask Claude to do a complex desktop task right away, it refuses

... builder s seat. After interviewing over 30 developers for my new projects, I ve noticed a disturbing trend. Most senior devs are stuck in a "Copy-Paste" loop. They use AI to generate a single function, but they refuse to let the AI see the "Full Truth" of the entire repository. They are treating a "Co-Architect" like a "Dictionary." In my view, this is a defensive mechanism a refusal

... structure. So I'm curious: If you're an experienced developer building your own product: -> Are you letting yourself vibecode the MVP, or are you engineering it "properly" from day one? -> What's the one thing you refuse to cut corners on, even for an MVP? -> Have you shipped something vibecoded and then regretted (or NOT regretted) the technical debt? Would love to hear from both sides. I think there's a middle ground here that nobody ... ... that. The pattern that works for me: architect it yourself, scaffold with AI, then review and refine everything. Vibecoding the whole thing end-to-end leads to fragile code that breaks the moment you need to change something. But refusing

... each tool to a stage in the build cycle, which is smart. Very curious how Emergent handles more complex workflows over time ,looks promising. Comment from Paul Tseluyko(@paultseluyko): I actually prefer Claude code or GPT Copilot extension for VSCode more than Cursor. I don't understand the hype around Cursor, why is it better than just having an extension? Comment from Paul Tseluyko(@paultseluyko): @minach  adoption of Cursor is just so huge and I don't understand ... ... into Cursor s composer to skip the manual styling tax. It s the ultimate shortcut for shipping polished MVPs while the "vibe" is still fresh and strong. What s the one tool in your current stack that you absolutely refuse