Google Antigravity

Name: Google Antigravity
Rating: 4.53 (17 reviews)

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.5•17 reviews•

1.9K followers

Run and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

4.5•17 reviews•

1.9K followers

Visit website

AI Coding Agents

•

AI Code Editors

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

This is the 3rd launch from Google Antigravity. View more

Google Antigravity CLI

Launching today

Run coding agents directly from your terminal

Antigravity CLI brings multi-step reasoning, multi-file editing, tool calling, and persistent history to the terminal. Optimised for SSH sessions and keyboard-first workflows. For developers who live in the command line.

Free Options

Launch tags:Developer Tools•Artificial Intelligence•Tech

Launch Team

AppSignal — Track your app’s health, errors and performance with ease

Track your app’s health, errors and performance with ease

Promoted

Be the first to comment

Previous Google Antigravity Launches

Google Antigravity 2.0Orchestrate multi-agent workflows from a desktop app

Launched on May 21st, 2026

Google AntigravityRun and monitor several coding agents at once in an IDE

Launched on November 19th, 2025

Launching Today

Day Rank

Company Info

antigravity.google

Google Antigravity Info

Launched in 2025

View 3 launches

Forum

p/google-antigravity

Awards

View all

SocialX

Similar Products

Kilo Code v7 for VS CodeRun Parallel AI Agents in VS Code. Free & Open Source.

Promoted

Cursor

The AI Code Editor

5.0(850 reviews)

Code editors AI Coding Agents

Warp

The open-source ADE

4.8(72 reviews)

AI Coding Agents Terminals

Kiro

Agentic development for prototype to production

5.0(11 reviews)

AI Coding Agents AI Code Editors

Codex 3.0 by OpenAI

Codex can now build, test & debug on autopilot

5.0(17 reviews)

AI Coding Agents Code Review Tools

Windsurf

The first agentic IDE. Tomorrow's editor, today.

4.7(64 reviews)

Code editors AI Coding Agents

4.5

Based on 17 reviews

Review Google Antigravity?

Reviewers see Google Antigravity as a strong, fast AI coding tool that is especially useful for planning, explaining code, and helping users move from ideas to working implementations. Users praise clear walkthroughs, practical help on tasks like Terraform and AWS flows, and productivity gains even for nontechnical work such as mockups. Makers of Socra and Dropy say its parallel agent workflow is effective for big feature design and complex backend logic. The main complaints are UI bugs, weak onboarding, and inconsistent performance on larger, multi-file projects.

+14

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•1 review

What's great

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

What needs improvement

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

vs Alternatives

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

26 views2mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

Mostly needs some bugfixes and UI polish. E.g. sometimes one of the panels obscures an Accept/Reject button, so it's hard to see the app is waiting for user input. And when allowing certain commands, I haven't been able to make this stick yet. There's an allowlist for commands in the settings, but this doesn't seem to work for me.

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Github Copilot

Claude Code

Cursor never quite resonated with me, but I need to give it another shot. Claude Code is great with Opus 4.5, but way too expensive. Antigravity is very close to Claude Code, and as a paid Google AI Pro subscriber I haven't bumped into any limits yet. I actually like Copilot quite a bit as well.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

98 views5mo ago

•2 reviews

What's great

I tried AntiGravity and am very satisfied, as it allowed me to be highly productive and tackle complex tasks efficiently. I am also very grateful to the team for making this possible, and I’m excited for future updates and what’s to come. 😊

What needs improvement

I think the biggest potential for improvement probably lies in enhancing the Agents. I’m not currently using the Agent Manager (CTRL + E), because, to be honest, I usually handle one task at a time, as the tasks are very complex and need to be reviewed and understood by me.

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

75 views6mo ago

•1 review

What's great

It actually explains what’s going on, not just writes code.

I used it while working on Terraform + AWS, and it broke down the full flow (API → Lambda) in a way that just made sense
Saves time switching between docs and code
Feels fast and gives straight answers without over-explaining
Helpful when you’re trying to understand why something is happening, not just fix it

What needs improvement

Doesn’t always handle bigger projects across multiple files that well
Could give more real-world edge case examples
Sometimes I just want a shorter answer, a bit more control there would help

vs Alternatives

I tried GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Amazon Q.

Copilot is good for suggestions, but not great at explaining things
Cursor is solid, but felt more general
Amazon Q is useful for AWS, but sometimes too long or not very clear

I went with Antigravity because it felt more practical for what I was doing (infra + APIs).

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

26 views2mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Some UI quirks and minor bugs, but very powerful overall. I really like how it handles implementation plans and walkthroughs. I think it will be great a couple months from now.

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Cursor

Github Copilot

Claude Code

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

98 views5mo ago

•2 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Because it integrates Gemini3 in a free tier.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

75 views6mo ago