Claude by Anthropic

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•627 reviews•

34K followers

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•627 reviews•

34K followers

Visit website

LLMs

•

AI Chatbots

We're an AI research company that builds reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. Our first product is Claude, an AI assistant for tasks at any scale.

Claude by Anthropic Reviews

The community submitted 627 reviews to tell us what they like about Claude by Anthropic, what Claude by Anthropic can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 627 reviews

Review Claude by Anthropic?

Claude by Anthropic draws strong praise for reasoning, coding, and long-context work, with many switching from rivals for more precise, human-like responses. Maker feedback is especially enthusiastic: the makers of

Bubble

rely on Claude for prototyping and early app builds; the makers of

Lovable

report excellent performance powering their product; and the makers of

Zapier

highlight reliable tool use via MCP across thousands of actions. Common wishes: fewer message limits, smoother artifacts/UX on desktop, and steadier revision behavior. Overall: reliable, thoughtful, and superb for code.

+629

Summarized with AI

Pros

AI assistant (81)

code generation (54)

contextual understanding (33)

reasoning capabilities (33)

data analysis (18)

nuanced responses (17)

creative writing (16)

ethical AI (10)

fast performance (10)

long context windows (7)

Cons

message limits (10)

typography issues (8)

contextual understanding (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (581)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (46)

View all

•1 review

What's great

AI assistant (81)contextual understanding (33)reasoning capabilities (33)

Claude is super smart, easy to work with, and great at staying on track even with complicated questions. It writes really well and feels thoughtful compared to some other chatbots. Sometimes it’s a bit overly careful, but that also means I can trust its responses more. Definitely one of the best AI assistants out there.

What needs improvement

contextual understanding (2)

It also doesn’t always know the latest information, and its answers can occasionally feel wordy or generalized.

vs Alternatives

ChatGPT by OpenAI Gemini

Gemini

I picked Claude because it feels thoughtful, clear, and helpful in its responses. It handles complex tasks well without being overwhelming, and its emphasis on safety and reliability makes it easy to trust for everyday use.

Are there limits on daily messages or rate caps?

As a user, I haven’t run into strict daily message limits, but there are rate caps if I send a lot of messages very quickly. For normal use, it feels unlimited, but heavy or automated usage can hit throttles. Overall, limits aren’t a problem for regular conversations.

Does Claude work offline or require constant internet?

Claude requires an internet connection, so it doesn’t work offline. As long as my connection is stable, it’s reliable, but there’s no offline mode for times without internet.

What differences between Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku matter most?

The biggest differences that matter to me are reasoning quality, speed, and cost. Opus is the best when I need deep thinking or detailed writing, but it’s slower and more expensive. Sonnet is the best all-around choice for everyday tasks. Haiku is super fast and cheap, which is great for quick questions or simple summaries. I pick based on how much “brainpower” the task really needs.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

452 views3mo ago

•3 reviews