Launched this week

Plansera AI

Launched this week

E-2 visa business plans, drafted by an AI

157 followers

E-2 visa business plans, drafted by an AI

157 followers

•

•

An AI E-2 Visa Agent interviews, reads their evidence (bank statements, leases, invoices), checks the core E-2 eligibility standards, and produces a submission-ready plan with real 5-year financials, charts, and use-of-funds — as a designed PDF and editable Word doc. Outside vendors charge ~$2,000 and paralegals spend a week on this. Plansera gives you a strong first draft to review in ~30 minutes. Flat $100 per plan, no subscription. (Built for U.S. immigration professionals.)

Payment Required

Launch tags:SaaS•Legal•Artificial Intelligence

Launch Team / Built With

KeplerAgentic development environment to run agents at scale

Promoted

Plansera AI

Maker

📌

I build tools for immigration law firms, and the E-2 business plan keeps coming up as the same headache for everyone I talk to. Today a firm has two options: pay an outside vendor around $2,000 per plan, or spend close to a week of a paralegal's time pulling figures, building the financials, and formatting something the consulate will actually accept. Plansera is a third option. An AI agent handles all in plain language, reads their actual documents — bank statements, leases, invoices — extracts source-of-funds and use-of-funds, runs the core E-2 checks (substantial investment, capital at risk, non-marginal enterprise, directing role), and generates a submission-ready plan with deterministic 5-year financials and charts. You get a designed PDF and an editable Word file. To be clear about what it is and isn't: it produces a genuinely strong first draft, not a finished filing. The workflow is roughly 30 minutes of careful review by the professional on the case — the attorney's judgment stays the attorney's judgment. It removes the blank-page week, not the oversight. Flat $100 per plan, no subscription. There's an example plan already in the dashboard so you can see the output before paying for anything. Would love feedback from anyone in immigration law or legaltech — especially on the eligibility checks and the financial model. What would make this defensible enough for your practice?

Report

5d ago

Love the launch .. immigration attorneys are incredibly risk-averse. if the agent flags a weak spot during the core checks (like low source of funds tracking), qq. does it provide recommendations on what evidence is missing? @daniel_legaltech

Report

3d ago

Plansera AI

Maker

@priya_kushwaha1 Exactly Priya. It asks further documents or information when something is missing like source of funds, capital is at risk etc.

Report

3d ago

Mailwarm

How do you handle sensitive client docs, like where the evidence gets stored and how long you retain it?

Report

2d ago

Plansera AI

Maker

@thamibenjelloun we dont store the document itself, we store the OCRed markdowns on AWS. There is no time limit for now but it is a good idea to add a time limit like maybe 3 months etc. Thanks🙏🏻

Report

2d ago

StartupBase

The $100 flat per plan is smart pricing for a per-matter workflow. It maps directly to how law firms think about costs, per matter, not per seat or per month.

Curious what typically changes during the 30 minutes of attorney review. Is it mostly checking the financials, or do the narratives usually need rewriting too?

Report

2d ago

Plansera AI

Maker

@attacomsian Thanks! The financials need the least review; they're deterministic, so they hold. The 30 minutes is mostly case strategy: tailoring the narrative to the applicant and the consular post, framing the source of funds, positioning non-marginality, and the directing role. Less about fixing mistakes, more about judgment. And that judgment is exactly why the attorney stays in the loop before anything gets filed.

Report

2d ago

Respect for being this upfront that it's a strong first draft and the attorney's judgment stays theirs, most launches oversell that. Does telling users the financials are deterministic actually make them trust the draft more, or does it just shift where the 30 min of review goes?

Report

1d ago