Shashank Verma

Most color tools generate palettes. We built a complete UI color workflow.

by

Most color tools help you generate pretty palettes.

But real products need much more than that.

They need:
• hierarchy
• accessibility
• dark mode
• semantic roles
• scalable tokens
• developer exports
• consistency across screens

That’s why we built TintVibe.

A connected color workflow platform for:
designers, developers, and product teams.

Instead of generating random colors,
TintVibe helps teams move from:

Palette → Shades → Contrast → Brand System → Export

✨ Generate palettes
✨ Create scalable shades
✨ Fix contrast issues
✨ Build semantic color systems
✨ Export for Tailwind, shadcn/ui, Figma Variables & Token Studio
✨ Convert palettes to dark mode
✨ Compare before/after UI improvements

Most tools stop at inspiration.

We want to help teams ship production-ready interfaces.

Would love feedback from the PH community 💜

https://tintvibe.in/app/generator

22 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Danush Singla

I like the color workflow approach. How does TintVibe handle all the different screen sizes, especially mobile?

I’ve found mobile UI colors/hierarchy way harder to get right, so it’s impressive you’re building this out past just palette generation.

Shashank Verma
@danush_singla Thanks Danush, really appreciate that. That’s exactly one of the problems we’re thinking about. Colors don’t behave the same across desktop and mobile because screen size, spacing, contrast, and visual hierarchy change a lot. With TintVibe, the goal is to help teams move beyond just “nice palettes” and build responsive color systems — including shades, contrast checks, role-based colors, and UI-ready tokens that can work better across mobile and desktop interfaces. Mobile hierarchy is definitely harder, and that’s why we’re focusing on production-ready color workflows instead of only palette inspiration.
Danush Singla

@verma_shashank That makes sense. I’ve been thinking about this for my own UI too. Are teams usually planning colors/tokens properly from the start for these responsive color systems, or mostly fixing contrast and hierarchy later once the UI starts feeling off?

Shashank Verma

@danush_singla Mostly fixing it later.

A lot of teams start with “nice colors” for screens, then realize later that the system doesn’t scale across components, states, dark mode, accessibility, and responsive layouts.

The better approach is to plan tokens early:

• semantic roles
• surface levels
• text hierarchy
• border states
• interaction states
• contrast rules
• light/dark behavior

That way colors are not just visual choices — they become part of the product system.

Danush Singla

@verma_shashank That makes sense, especially the part about teams mostly fixing it later.

When a user gets to the point where they know the UI feels off, but they don’t know whether the issue is contrast, hierarchy, brand fit, dark mode, or color roles, how would they use TintVibe to figure that out?

Is there already something in place to guide them from “something feels wrong” to the specific system-level change they should make?